UR20Z
Dumpster Diver
OK, answer: MaybeOk I set it down. XD
OK, answer: MaybeOk I set it down. XD
True that. You just never know.OK, answer: MaybeHard to predict any better than that at this point. Though I notice that the poll has ticked up to 3:1 against...
Yeah, I expect this is gonna be a 3-6 day tantrum, it'll get spanked for most of that period, and not long after, we'll hear no more from this particular specimen as it slinks away with its tail curled tightly between its legs.True that. You just never know.
Thats actually what made me laugh when I voted. It reveals the results and I had a nice chuckle.
Not sure what this guy expected but I don't think it was that.
?How many roads, must a man walk down, before you can call him a man...?Sounds to me like you want to create what some would call an echo chamber. You can delete posts you dont like, and you get to decide whose points of conversation are included on your chosen topic.
Is that facism or totalitarianism I smell brewing?
So, instead of addressing some of the concerns people raised about your suggestion, you make a passive-aggressive remark.It is comical how the use of one word has lit afire such drum beating by the crowd... R-I-G-H-T-S... LMAO....jump on that low lying fruit I left there for you....LOL
They do have that right, before posting. Once you post in a public forum, be it internet or a crowded sidewalk, you do not get to decide who gets to voice an opinion. Doing so is called censorship and runs contrary to public discourse, free thought, and the freedom to express opinions and arguments. Be reminded, freedom of speech does NOT protect an individual's popular opinions, rather, it is there to protect unpopular or offensive thoughts and opinions.I can see your point, but does the OP not have the right to keep unwanted opinions off of their thread. If the opinionated reply deem it necessary, they can always post a separate thread with their own opinion.
This is actually not what this would do if it is implemented. There will be no change to the software of the forum.You can delete posts you dont like
So here are some points where this could go wrong which I pointed out in the dumpster fire also:There's no possible way that this could go wrong, that's sarcasm by the way.
No.
Too many variables to even consider, and if it was even possible. Still no. Mods would still remove it either way without the OP's consent if it violates the rules anyway.
Hallelujah!!!!!!! Another one with comprehension! I'm feeling less and less lonely by the minuteThey do have that right, before posting. Once you post in a public forum, be it internet or a crowded sidewalk, you do not get to decide who gets to voice an opinion. Doing so is called censorship and runs contrary to public discourse, free thought, and the freedom to express opinions and arguments. Be reminded, freedom of speech does NOT protect an individual's popular opinions, rather, it is there to protect unpopular or offensive thoughts and opinions.
A decent amount, see above.How much additional work / stress / time consumed would this add to mods
Again. Porn only. Otherwise this is a public forum.reported posts of users get removed, because out of thin air they don't like those in their own echo chamber?
It would, it is the same thing. Nothing in the software or user privileges is changing.Wouldn't the existing “report” button on every post do the same thing? Or is this something different?
That's for sure, but especially in the "porn" category (with sub categories, like the initially relevant non-animal related "woman" category) there is quite a lively share of "semi"-porn with hundreds of comments.Again. Porn only. Otherwise this is a public forum.
Yes, the usually applied analysis of "why is this posted here" does not work any longer in this case.Another is that currently if for example someone posts a guy with a dog in the woman with dogs subforum, it is automatically assumed that they do not know how the forum works and posted it wrong by accident.
The thread is moved to the correct category.
With this change a mod would have to contact the poster, ask them whether they are trans and want to keep the thread there and only then find out that they do not understand what women with animals means.
Since it's been maintaining something reasonably close to 3:1 against, I doubt it's going anywhere but down in ? even without DF-grade input. (Which I've been being fighting every fiber of my being to remain VERY CAREFUL not to inject enough of to be objectionable, I'll thank everyone to know. I'm amazing even myself with the restraint being applied.)I think the most uncomfortable part of all of this is how OP has zero interest in the concerns of anyone else. Mods, other members, anyone who actually supports this, nada. A close second is how bad this could backfire if it passes. There's more than one echo chamber possible here.
I don't really care about the organization of the porn section, aside from the fact organization makes abuse easier to spot and snuff out. I do care about everyone having to deal with the backlash this could cause everywhere else. Like the possible pages of poles like this one just for one example.
I doubt it's going anywhere too. But plenty of people vote on things they don't know about because of who wants it.Since it's been maintaining something reasonably close to 3:1 against, I doubt it's going anywhere but down in ? even without DF-grade input. (Which I've been being fighting every fiber of my being to remain VERY CAREFUL not to inject enough of to be objectionable, I'll thank everyone to know. I'm amazing even myself with the restraint being applied.)
This! This right here! You just described me to a "T".Don't worry I don't include you types to my general low opinion, I'm all for live let live, just the types we're discussing I enjoy when they stomp in and make a scene.
I understand this is an out lier and doesn't represent you all..
The OPs "rules" would always be sub-par compared to the forum rules, which are active anyway.Since it's been maintaining something reasonably close to 3:1 against, I doubt it's going anywhere ..
Yep, precisely. I suspect he's enjoying the roast "quietly" before dropping the hammer.I'm still waiting for ZT to pop in, lock the thread, and post a 2012 era rage comic meme basically stating "ain't happening chief." ?
Read my mind.I'm still waiting for ZT to pop in, lock the thread, and post a 2012 era rage comic meme basically stating "ain't happening chief." ?
Very much the expected outcome since the beginning.I'm still waiting for ZT to pop in, lock the thread, and post a 2012 era rage comic meme basically stating "ain't happening chief." ?