Why I flat out refuse to donate to them. They seem to describe anything besides "missionary with your eyes closed" as a paraphilia.*sigh*
I've tried multiple times to put the information back up on the wikipedia page, but I keep getting into edit wars with people and mods reverting what I added. Meanwhile its the same exact data that was in another wikipedia article that was taken down
And youd be wrong. There were never ANY open beasties in decades past. There were one or two who claimed it, and went to jail for it. Reality check....The Crime may not have been explicitly Bestiality, but a "Crime against Nature" or "Unlawful Carnal Knowledge". or even
I have no idea what the fuck you're even referring to, I think you have me confused with the wrong person unless you can provide a screen shot.. I barely post or comment so I don't know where you're coming off with that ?
Please provide a proof.
He's referring to @allyfitz from some feud those two users got into awhile back. You know Allyfitz... the girl you stole your avatar from?
The Pink Triangle badge in Concentration Camps indicated Homosexuals OR other sex offenders. You can google the Chart with the badges and what each color indicated. I dont think the chart has a place here.
I googled the chart and it says "homosexual". It has a place here for fact checking purposes. A marker for other sexual "deviations" would not have proved that people were killed for bestiality by the way.
There's someone here who has your same profile pic, thought it was that one person with a new handle.
I can confirm this. I saw the documentation when I took training to be a Christian Minister in another life wayyyy long ago. Yes, it did include all forms of sexual deviancy against the natural order (anything not PIV (penis in vagina) heterosexual).
*sigh*
I've tried multiple times to put the information back up on the wikipedia page, but I keep getting into edit wars with people and mods reverting what I added. Meanwhile its the same exact data that was in another wikipedia article that was taken down
Here's an idea... dont steal someone else avatar on this site! I made that avatar from the PuppyLinux Logo years and years ago when I first signed up to AoZ. I've used it at AoZ, Zoosbook, bestialitylovers, BAF, and here. Please stop using it, because people think you're comments are mine.
@ZTHorse @FloofyNewfie Now that @allyfitz has formally requested the thief to stop using her content she created under Fair Use, I believe you can intervene under the rules and force the removal of @rainfallheavens avatar.
This shit is getting out of control. First of all, it's an avatar it's the Internet. Everybody can do what they want. I'm actually into photography and under the fair use agreement, as long as it's copyrighted, then she has an obligation to take further action, but in no way is this avatar or this picture copyrighted, furthermore, I don't see the big deal anyway, it's not like I even post, often it's not like I'm pretending to be the other person you can look at all of my activity and see, but I've done nothing wrong. It's literally just an avatar.. There's been many times when people have stolen my avatars over the years, and the fact that you're getting bent out of shape and posting on my wall and trying to harass me because of a avatar is absolutely ridiculous..
Yea you were a member at this site before me... that's true... but that's not the point. There's comments in your profile from you in March of this year where you're talking to someone else about your profile picture being a black and white photo. So if you wanna play the "who was first game"... fine... I was using this avatar first on this site before you were.
I've gone ahead and took the liberty of removing his... I mean... your avatar off of his account, since he doesn't have your permission to use it.
The question is moot. Would a bestialist have been put in a camp as a sex offender? I dont think theres much doubt. Would that person have been killed for it? Death in those camps came in many ways, chum. Being gassed or shot is not different than being arbeited to death. I probably cannot prove my statement to anyone. I think you cannot prove me wrong, and you've already twisted a fact. How many wiki look ups did it take to find the one that DOESN'T say "and other sex offenders"? Truth is truth.
Poor baby....Got news for you chummy....all one need do to own a " copyright" is to create it....Intellectual property law is pretty plain. Even if you intend to publish, no further action is required. Registering a property as Copyright accrues certain further rights. Some are accruals, some deal with reversion of rights to a creator after a certain period...as when a work is sold for use in a periodical. But since Allyfitz was using the avatar on another site well over a year ago...you lose. You remind me of a fella from Beast Forum some years back...same cheesy whine. He called himself "wheels"...and felt entitled to have animal sex delivered. He lost too.
No, it is not for at least two reasons:
How about you stop repeating claims that you can't prove?
The picture I posted is literally the first search engine hit I got. I also bothered to make a second look up which turned up a different edition of the same chart which also said homosexuals and nothing else. I also checked that both are from reliable sources and that reposting it here does not violate any law. Your allegation that I would have twisted anything here is disgusting when in fact I have followed your orders ("You can google the Chart with the badges and what each color indicated") while you were too lazy to support even this claim.
I forget sometimes, I'm dealing with the "Pics or it didnt happen " generation. Same clowns who insisted that a forty foot diameter tree stump had to be a fake because " No one ever made a saw blade that big".
No, I asked you politely to prove your claim. You've written a lot of words since then and went ad hominem, but have not offered a single evidence. Thanks for defining the standard of credibility for your posts though, I guess.
And So here we are....you cant accept the obvious....I never said I was claiming or wished to claim victimhood for Zoos. As for ad hominem, if that shoe fits...wear it. I use Duck Duck Go as a search engine, and I suppose that could be why. But the first and second charts I saw were duplicates, and the "and other sex offenders" was plainly at the top of both of them. I see many discussions here that appear predicated on black and white views of the World. Thats quite nice, if thats the only vision you have. But the World is nuances and shades of grey between the extremes. Youre denying acts that were unacceptible by any civilized standard. A short extrapolation is all it takes to conclude that any sex offenders who were taken up for Deviant activity and placed in those camps, that DIED there, died for their deviance. The German propensity for record-keeping would likely prove the point.No, I asked you politely to prove your claim. You've written a lot of words since then and went ad hominem, but have not offered a single evidence. Thanks for defining the standard of credibility for your posts though, I guess.
Japan is my plan, as soon as I can.
