• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

I did a post on reddit defending Zoophilia, reinforcements would be appreciated.

did you made a couple of people change their minds on Zoophilia? If you did, it was worth it.
Yeah, a whole bunch of people changed their minds - They went from not thinking about the topic at all, other than perhaps as a joke, to being dead-set against allowing those "animal fucking freaks" to continue going about their business without being jailed, taking away their critters, or otherwise punished for their evil ways.

In other words, the result was entirely negative. So no, it wasn't worth it. And it never will be.
 
Yeah, a whole bunch of people changed their minds - They went from not thinking about the topic at all, other than perhaps as a joke, to being dead-set against allowing those "animal fucking freaks" to continue going about their business without being jailed, taking away their critters, or otherwise punished for their evil ways.

In other words, the result was entirely negative. So no, it wasn't worth it. And it never will be.
if bringuing the topic up is purely negative, how did the gays became accepted?
 
Reddit is the last place I'd ever try to change someone's opinion. I mean have you read how much of an echo chamber that place is?? It's literally a hive mind of think like us or get downvoted to hell/power hungry keyboard warrior mods remove the post. Just like what you like and move on with life, fuck needing someone else's approval, especially on the internet.
 
Reddit is the last place I'd ever try to change someone's opinion. I mean have you read how much of an echo chamber that place is?? It's literally a hive mind of think like us or get downvoted to hell/power hungry keyboard warrior mods remove the post. Just like what you like and move on with life, fuck needing someone else's approval, especially on the internet.
well, it looks like that subreddit is not like this at all. It wasn't neither downvoted or upvoted, and most people there are being kinda reasonable. And I'm not doing this to seek for approval, heck no. Do you know how I became a zoo? From a post just like this one.
 
Do I think the minds of non zoos can be changed, NO. Do I think that zoos could fight for their right to have sex with animals. Yes,,, IF, the entirety of the zoo community was to band together all at once and as a huge hoard starting posting together all at once on topics in communities and across the world and making displays everywhere the way the gays did.

Do I think the zoo community will ever come together like that. NO!
I feel if done the right way/place it would actually work
I agree, but there in lies the key. Getting enough zoos to go for it all at the same time and the same way, there is the problem.
 
Also I hope it goes well - most people aren't actually that opposed to animal sex - it's just that those that are usually are the loudest.
Dude, I don't know what rock you have been under, but here in the southern type states dominated by christers, Yes, most of the people around here are THAT against animal sex.
 
did you made a couple of people change their minds on Zoophilia? If you did, it was worth it.
No, it was not worth it. The person he is talking about brought zoophilia into the light for those who knew nothing about it and as a consequences states that had no lowas against it have now created laws that are felonies. A one man show cannot make laws better.
 
well, it looks like that subreddit is not like this at all. It wasn't neither downvoted or upvoted, and most people there are being kinda reasonable. And I'm not doing this to seek for approval, heck no. Do you know how I became a zoo? From a post just like this one.
I am sorry. My opinion, you do not BECOME zoo. You either have the attraction or you do not. They may be buried thoughts, but they are there. As soon as I hit puberty I started looking at animals on nature shows in a whole different light. than I did before puberty. I did not become zoo, I was from the beginning of my sex life.
 
if bringuing the topic up is purely negative, how did the gays became accepted?
Gays are tolerated, not accepted. At least here in the USA. Have you ever seen a God fearing redneck turn red in the face with anger, veins popping out and about to explode while talking about how all them damn quears and fags need to be hung? I have. I have lived in good Christen God fearing red neck vile and let me tell you, gays are not accepted there. Only tolerated because the law tells the christers they are not allowed to burn gays at the stake any more.
 
As I have said, I do think laws can be changed. I do think it can be in favor for zoos being TOLERATED. I however, do not think a post on reddit will be of any adventitious venture. A million zoos standing outside city hall. Maybe. Anything less, no.
 
noone else raised an eyebrow over this? you became a zoo from a reddit post? not from, let's randomly say, feeling attraction towards animals? how does one "become" a zoo?

and stop comparing "us" to homosexuals.. we're nothing alike.
I raised one, then the other! LOL. Already posted on it too. :D
 
man, you're the 5th one to say that. I said "chocolate for dogs". There's a special kind of chocolate without theobromine, made specially for dogs and cats
Um.I think I was the FIRST one, but who's counting? Regardless, sonny, its a punk example, because WE know that there IS such a thing. I will not debate the sensibility of that stuff here. But as to the mundanes, what do you think theyre going to think?
 
Gays are tolerated, not accepted. At least here in the USA. Have you ever seen a God fearing redneck turn red in the face with anger, veins popping out and about to explode while talking about how all them damn quears and fags need to be hung? I have. I have lived in good Christen God fearing red neck vile and let me tell you, gays are not accepted there. Only tolerated because the law tells the christers they are not allowed to burn gays at the stake any more.
That's pretty solid truth. I personally don't really give a damn about gays one way or the other - so long as they aren't waving it in my face. Then I might say a cross word or two, exactly as I'd be likely to say a cross word or two at a pair of straights waving it in my face. Who (or what, in our circles) you fuck isn't my concern, and frankly, it's almost certain I neither need, nor want, to hear about it. Do I "approve" of queers? <shrug> I guess, way deep down, I'd have to say "not really". But since I'm going to the effort to be honest, I also have to add that it's a "not really" that has about as much "oomph" behind it as a couple specks of gunpowder sitting at the bottom of a glass of water.

That said, I know damned well I'm *NOT* typical of the rest of America. I have zero doubts about the idea that the type of rednecks you describe are all too real. And based on my own personal observations, I strongly suspect they exist in numbers that would surprise the bejeebers out of a WHOLE LOT of folks.
 
I got bored and created a throwaway account on reddit. I made a post. I fully expect the reddit gods... err... umm... MODS to delete my comment and also ban my throwaway account, but here's what I posted...

"It's really not hard to discern whether or not a dog wants to engage in sexual behaviors. The most important thing is that you have let the dog choose on it's own whether or not it wishes to engage in said behaviors with a human. As someone mentioned before there is a master/subservient power dynamic aspect you have to contend with. The easiest way one could overcome this is to simply read the dog's body language, as that's their most effective way of communicating.

Is the dog showing signs that it is making sexual advances towards you? For example, if a female dog is flagging you? (parting her tail to the side to expose her private bits) Is she backing herself towards you? Does she seem excited? Are you engaging with her as a male dog would with a female dog during a mating courtship? If the answer is yes, then any sexual encounter would more than likely be viewed as enjoyable for the dog. When mating, dogs are shown to release the brain chemicals: dopamine, oxytocin, and vasopressin, which are the same chemical released by humans while engaging in sexual activities.

Is she rejecting sexual advances? Backing away from you? Has her tail tucked between her legs. Looks apathetic and maybe even fearful. Possibly even growling/whining at you? If the dog is displaying signs that it is uncomfortable then any further sexual advances would be considered forceful and even rape. If a human wishes to be involved this way with an animal, it's important that the animal reciprocate these feelings. It's also important not to acclimate the dog towards sex. They call all the shots, not you.

I'm not arguing whether or not bestiality should be normalized within society or not. A matter of fact, I don't think it will ever be. This is due to the animal's inability to speak out against any sexual abuse it may receive from a human that doesn't wish to let the animal choose whether or not the activity is even wanted in the first place. My argument is that if you let the dog decide whether or not it WANTS to engage in this activity, then bestiality can be essentially harmless. Dogs live in the moment after all. If it feels good, then they'll seek it out on their own terms. No coercion is needed. You also have to remember that sex is not sacred for an animal, it's driven by lust and an instinct to pass along it's genes alone."

Let the FUN begin! :devilish:

www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/ladikx/cmv_theres_nothing_wrong_with_zoophilia/gloqi6p?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
 
Last edited:
I got bored and created a throwaway account on reddit. I made a post. I fully expect the reddit gods... err... umm... MODS to delete my comment and also ban my throwaway account, but here's what I posted...

"It's really not hard to discern whether or not a dog wants to engage in sexual behaviors. The most important thing is that you have let the dog choose on it's own whether or not it wishes to engage in said behaviors with a human. As someone mentioned before there is a master/subservient power dynamic aspect you have to contend with. The easiest way one could overcome this is to simply read the dog's body language, as that's their most effective way of communicating.


Is the dog showing signs that it is making sexual advances towards you? For example, if a female dog is flagging you? (parting her tail to the side to expose her private bits) Is she backing herself towards you? Does she seem excited? Are you engaging with her as a male dog would with a female dog during a mating courtship? If the answer is yes, then any sexual encounter would more than likely be viewed as enjoyable for the dog. When mating, dogs are shown to release the brain chemicals: dopamine, oxytocin, and vasopressin, which are the same chemical released by humans while engaging in sexual activities.

Is she rejecting sexual advances? Backing away from you? Has her tail tucked between her legs. Looks apathetic and maybe even fearful. Possibly even growling/whining at you? If the dog is displaying signs that it is uncomfortable then any further sexual advances would be considered forceful and even rape. If a human wishes to be involved this way with an animal, it's important that the animal reciprocate these feelings. It's also important not to acclimate the dog towards sex. They call all the shots, not you.

I'm not arguing whether or not bestiality should be normalized within society or not. A matter of fact, I don't think it will ever be. This is due to the animal's inability to speak out against any sexual abuse it may receive from a human that doesn't wish to let the animal choose whether or not the activity is even wanted in the first place. My argument is that if you let the dog decide whether or not it WANTS to engage in this activity, then bestiality can be essentially harmless. Dogs live in the moment after all. If it feels good, then they'll seek it out on their own terms. No coercion is needed. You also have to remember that sex is not sacred for an animal, it's driven by lust and an instinct to pass along it's genes alone."

Let the FUN begin! :devilish:
Quick let's make a bunch of throw away accounts to give floofy karma/awards everyone!!!
 
well, it looks like that subreddit is not like this at all. It wasn't neither downvoted or upvoted, and most people there are being kinda reasonable. And I'm not doing this to seek for approval, heck no. Do you know how I became a zoo? From a post just like this one.
See? People are very neutral although it's weird to see I thought they are more "argh rawr get the pitch forks".
 
Honestly this just seems like a waste of time. Don't concern yourself with what others think about you, some people will simply never agree and that's just the reality of it. And if you really want to try don't bother with Reddit, its one of the worst places for discussing anything.
 
Dude, I don't know what rock you have been under, but here in the southern type states dominated by christers, Yes, most of the people around here are THAT against animal sex.
I'm not under a rock - just in another country that doesn't take religion as seriously anymore - at least my part of it.
 
if bringuing the topic up is purely negative, how did the gays became accepted?
First and foremost, they didn't. They're tolerated - sorta. And not very well in a lot of places, as has been mentioned elsewhere in the thread. That's not "acceptance". That's being allowed to exist because doing that is less headache than what the preferred method of dealing with them (namely, killing them) would bring down on the head of whoever pulled the trigger, swings the baseball bat, etc.

Second, gay and zoo are two entirely separate concepts that have no relation to each other whatsoever, beyond the fact that there's a huge percentage of normies that consider both to be disgusting perversions worthy of death by the most expedient (and hopefully painful) method that comes to hand.
 
First and foremost, they didn't. They're tolerated - sorta. And not very well in a lot of places, as has been mentioned elsewhere in the thread. That's not "acceptance". That's being allowed to exist because doing that is less headache than what the preferred method of dealing with them (namely, killing them) would bring down on the head of whoever pulled the trigger, swings the baseball bat, etc.

Second, gay and zoo are two entirely separate concepts that have no relation to each other whatsoever, beyond the fact that there's a huge percentage of normies that consider both to be disgusting perversions worthy of death by the most expedient (and hopefully painful) method that comes to hand.
well, I live in Brazil, and I did a test, asking other Brazilians online what they think about homosexuality; not a single person said that they think that it should be prohibited, no one said that gays shouldn't be allowed to marry, and only a couple said that they wouldn't be friends with a gay person. Seems like acceptance for me?
 
Back
Top