• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Horse statues

I'm glad some peeps like those statues :3

Posting a bit more for now!
The following ones are very beautiful and all come from Paris!

View attachment 491066
Wow, I didn't think I'd find a sculpture lover here. The horse next to the Musee d'Orsay (am I guessing right?) is the standard of elegance and grace. I even want to pet it)) ..and you can guess where)
 
IMG_5308.jpeg
the fragment of a copy of the statue of the condottiere Gattamelata 1453. Donatello. The first civil monument of the Renaissance.
The prototype was the equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius. (this statue with remains of gilding is in one of your photos above)
 
Last edited:
It’s funny everyone mentions this….I’ve gotten quite a few boners and even pumped lots of cum by looking at the PF Changs horse statue too! That sexy rump and thighs even though her hole is covered has made me orgasm to her beautiful curves many times! 😍
May I assume your amorous activities with equines are limited to your desires and imagination? I can attest the 'reality' far exceeds any fantasy...
 
Soooo... I wonder why statues of Stallions get sheath and balls sometimes, but I've never seen a mare statue with teats and a vulva. It seems there's a world-wide conspiracy cover-up! I've seen a bunch of sow statues that have a vulva. What gives?
Actually the Sgt. Reckless statue is anatomically correct.
 

Attachments

  • 1736367357435.png
    1736367357435.png
    617.7 KB · Views: 17
Last edited:
I believe (though I may be wrong) that it is easier to sculpt a horse penis than a horse pussy, which is why there are more statues of stallions than mares.
I read somewhere, that masculinity also symbols power and/or intimidation, which was meant to explain why some horse statues were explicitely stallions or why some lion statues had genitalia.

I don't know if that's the case though.

Might also be related to heraldic animals which are traditionally depicted as male ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzle )

On quora ( https://www.quora.com/Heraldry-Why-...ir-mouths-wide-open-and-a-tongue-sticking-out ) a similar answer appeared:

In a heraldic achievement, be it on the escutcheon/shield or as a crest, a beast is traditionally displayed as fierce as possible. That means a wide open maw or beak, and the tongue sticking out. Heraldic beasts are also frequently drawn with eyebrows and genitalia, just to look even fiercer. There are at least one reason for the way a creature is drawn this way, and it has to do with recognizability.

"(...) genitalia, just to look even fiercer."
Genitals are fierce. Check. Remind me to always hide mine. Don't want to threaten anyone by simply having some... ;)
 
I read somewhere, that masculinity also symbols power and/or intimidation, which was meant to explain why some horse statues were explicitely stallions or why some lion statues had genitalia.

I don't know if that's the case though.

Might also be related to heraldic animals which are traditionally depicted as male ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzle )

On quora ( https://www.quora.com/Heraldry-Why-...ir-mouths-wide-open-and-a-tongue-sticking-out ) a similar answer appeared:



"(...) genitalia, just to look even fiercer."
Genitals are fierce. Check. Remind me to always hide mine. Don't want to threaten anyone by simply having some... ;)
An interesting treatise. Perhaps another consideration might be that the majority of human cultures in Asia and Europe were (are) patriarchal (e.g., male centered) where females were (are) considered less, property or reproductive vessels for males.

Personally I find this contemptible and disgusting really. Stallions may have bravado BUT mares have HEART. Consider the feats of Sgt. Reckless, ONLY a mare is capable of such dedication and focus. They are the mothers of the earth!
 
Lady Godiva is often on a anatomically correct mare as well.

View attachment 638101View attachment 638102
I want to pump my cum all up in that horses sexy bottom. Absolutely stunning realistic detail! I would cum stain all over that vulva and crack between those perfect round sexy mare thighs. Just to embrace a sexy rump like that and rub my penis against her lips would make me ejcaculate! 💦
 
Soooo... I wonder why statues of Stallions get sheath and balls sometimes, but I've never seen a mare statue with teats and a vulva. It seems there's a world-wide conspiracy cover-up! I've seen a bunch of sow statues that have a vulva. What gives?
I think it's because:

1. Most notable horses were stallions or geldings, due to being easier to deal with in activities where only they are included. Mares can be extremely temperamental during their cycles.

2. If they are mares, they're in a pose where the tail covers the vulva and anus. Keep in mind that mare udders aren't visible from a glance until they swell up during pregnancy, and even then, they may still not be easily noticeable.
 
Personally I find this contemptible and disgusting really.

Agreed!

Stallions may have bravado BUT mares have HEART. Consider the feats of Sgt. Reckless, ONLY a mare is capable of such dedication and focus. They are the mothers of the earth!

A bit too much anthropomorphisation for my taste. Those are entirely human qualities we tend to apply to other lifeforms, when in reality their reason for doing what they do is an entirely different one. Like in this example, the horse has no ideas about human ranks or honorary titles, nor does it care about that or about the accolades she acclaimed. She did what she did because she was trained to do so. Simple as that. Of course her story gets more polished to inspire admiration and the home nation, it's all part of propaganda (although not a negative one). But if you peel away all those layers of story crafting, in the end there is just a horse that did what it was trained to do, including to ignore explosions or other sounds and effects of warfare. To me, that's good enough. She helped greatly by being there. But that's not because of having "heart" (apart from the physical organ, that is) or because of an iron will or something, but because of training. If anything the people who trained her should get some accolades as well.

But in general I would distance myself from all too human attributes. Given, stallions and mares have psychological differences which also manifest in their behavior towards certain goals, but apart from those there is no poetry necessary.

All that said, of course the mare in question has done a great deed for those that relied on her. But I try to view this from a more pragmatic, less poetic point of view.

TL;DR: That mare is still a hero and the statue is well deserved. :)
 
Agreed!



A bit too much anthropomorphisation for my taste. Those are entirely human qualities we tend to apply to other lifeforms, when in reality their reason for doing what they do is an entirely different one. Like in this example, the horse has no ideas about human ranks or honorary titles, nor does it care about that or about the accolades she acclaimed. She did what she did because she was trained to do so. Simple as that. Of course her story gets more polished to inspire admiration and the home nation, it's all part of propaganda (although not a negative one). But if you peel away all those layers of story crafting, in the end there is just a horse that did what it was trained to do, including to ignore explosions or other sounds and effects of warfare. To me, that's good enough. She helped greatly by being there. But that's not because of having "heart" (apart from the physical organ, that is) or because of an iron will or something, but because of training. If anything the people who trained her should get some accolades as well.

But in general I would distance myself from all too human attributes. Given, stallions and mares have psychological differences which also manifest in their behavior towards certain goals, but apart from those there is no poetry necessary.

All that said, of course the mare in question has done a great deed for those that relied on her. But I try to view this from a more pragmatic, less poetic point of view.

TL;DR: That mare is still a hero and the statue is well deserved. :)
Let's agree to disagree. Obviously my experience with equines differs from yours. I don't 'humanize' non-humans in spite of what you might think. There are difficulties and limitations with human language especially when it comes to trying to describe/explain the ethereal/spiritual.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top