• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Get pregnant

torsda said:
Is it possible to get pregnant by a dog or other Animals? :giggle:
Click to expand...
Yes and No. If the idea is to find out can an animal's sperm penetrate and fertilize an egg: then yes some species can cross fertilize each others gametes. With regard to hyoomans we can cross fertilize with canines, bovines, equines and at least a few others. Fertilization however needs to be understood as one event in the sequence of zygote/fetal development. The fact of fertilization DOES NOT guarantee that the resulting zygoyr will survive and develop to maturity. So if you are considering the act of fertilization to coloquially be taken as "being pregnant" then yes, within certain species combinations. But strictly speaking the answer would almost certainly be no. Technically getting pregnant is a systemic condition induced when a fertilized egg implants in uterine wall. Since it is incredibly unlikely that an extreme cross species fertilized egg will survive to implantation. Then the systemic condition which we call pregnancy will not take place. Hope that clarifies it.
 
WuzzleFuzzle said:
Yes and No. If the idea is to find out can an animal's sperm penetrate and fertilize an egg: then yes some species can cross fertilize each others gametes. With regard to hyoomans we can cross fertilize with canines, bovines, equines and at least a few others. Fertilization however needs to be understood as one event in the sequence of zygote/fetal development. The fact of fertilization DOES NOT guarantee that the resulting zygoyr will survive and develop to maturity. So if you are considering the act of fertilization to coloquially be taken as "being pregnant" then yes, within certain species combinations. But strictly speaking the answer would almost certainly be no. Technically getting pregnant is a systemic condition induced when a fertilized egg implants in uterine wall. Since it is incredibly unlikely that an extreme cross species fertilized egg will survive to implantation. Then the systemic condition which we call pregnancy will not take place. Hope that clarifies it.
Click to expand...
Full of shit like a Christmas turkey.
 
Bitpyrate said:
There is a theoretical possibility with Chimp. There were Russian studies, but actual data is hard to find. There has been rumors that a Chimp Human hybrid is possible. But I cant find information validating it.
Click to expand...
I read a paperback bestiality book on that subject. The doctor doing the research was female, and she was injecting herself and a test male gorilla with this experimental serum. Of course, the serum enhanced their sex drive, so they got it on frequently. She ended up getting pregnant, but the creature died at birth. Not much detail on that part, but a sexy read.
 
bru.01 said:
No. But we know that many women would love to get pregnant with a dog.
Click to expand...
Some do, yes, that is definitely true. But a lot of the fun when it comes to having sex with animals is the fact that you can have all the raw unfiltered sex that you want without the worries of getting pregnant in the first place. A woman can let a dog bust a nut in her as many times as he wants to, and not worry about birthing and raising children, nor needing to take a pill (or any other contraceptive measure) to stop such a thing from happening. Just as I can bust a nut in my doggy girl raw and unfiltered and not worry about getting her pregnant. It's mutually fun and consequence free sex.
 
I've been going full :husky_nerd: nerd :gsd_nerd: and reading why several women trying for babies that were still actively having sex with their dogs and were unable to conceive until they stopped for about 2-3 weeks.

There are a number of mechanisms keeping a dog's sperm from penetrating a woman's egg, such as the mitotic checkpoint which requires all chromosomes to be correctly paired, but this also often fails amongst humans (hence people with downs syndrome).

However, due to the factors listed below, dog sperm often floods a woman's womb, inundating her fertile egg, with a few penetrating through her egg's defenses and impregnating her egg, albeit for only a short time before the chromosome mismatch causes it to fail and the egg becomes infertile.

1. Dog sperm appears to be faster and stronger than a man's sperm as a dog's uterine track is harsher to sperm than a woman's. So while a man's sperm can only last 3 days in a woman's womb, a dog's sperm can last up to 9 days while it seeks to impregnate her egg. https://breedingbusiness.com/unsuccessful-mating-of-dogs/

2. Dog sperm is shaped remarkably similar to human sperm and passes many of the same mechanical and physical checks that human sperm does https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-16322cbf89b199bfe335f9a6afdf7c8e

3. The average volume of human ejaculate is 1.5-5 ml https://www.issm.info/sexual-health-qa/what-factors-determine-semen-volume/#:~:text=On average, men expel between,as a man gets older. whereas the average volume of dog ejaculate ranges from 30-80 ml https://www.dvm360.com/view/canine-semen-collection-and-evaluation-proceedings

4. A healthy man can release up to 250 million sperm in an orgasm https://www.livescience.com/32437-why-are-250-million-sperm-cells-released-during-sex.html whereas a dog releases over 2 billion.

5. The shape and pressure of the dogs cock forces much of the semen directly on to the woman’s cervix. Since dog sperm has a much lower viscosity than human sperm, meaning that it is much more liquid and less dense, dog sperm has a much easier time passing through the cervix to impregnate its mate. Much of a dog's sperm is forced into it's mate's womb over the roughly 30 minutes mating session https://slate.com/technology/2014/0...-tie-baculum-humping-coital-tie-dog-knot.html.

6. Dogs often mate for 30-45 minutes with their mates. Due to the size of their member, the function of the knot holding all the sperm tightly inside of the vagina, the shape of the dog's penis in pushing directly against the cervix, the massive quantity of sperm ejected during a dog's 30-45 minutes of ejaculation, and the thin nature of dog's sperm, often a huge amount of dog sperm enters the womb directly - leading to a flood of sperm inside of a woman's womb overwhelming her eggs, and coating them completely while a few sperms manage to penetrate the egg's defenses and impregnate the woman's egg for a short time before the chromosome mismatch causes the egg to become infertile https://www.verywellfamily.com/miscarriage-and-chromosomal-abnormalities-2371491.

Every time a woman cums her cervix flexes open and presses against her mate's dick head, seeking to lap up his cum. As a woman is tied to her dog for 30-45 minutes, and all the factors above, often her cervix will lap up a tremendous amount of cum over the period, resulting in even more dog sperm flooding her womb and drowning her eggs, impregnating them for a short time. https://xhamster.com/videos/cervix-orgasm-8235846 and https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph58a594e4213cc.

You notice how much their cervixes opens when they're cumming, especially the second one, and even after orgasm how open they stay? It's pretty fucking hot to think about the sheer amount of doggy cum that gets pumped directly into a woman's womb whenever a woman is bred by her dog.

In effect, a dog's sperm inundates a woman's egg, coating it in sperm and ultimately often overwhelming her egg's defenses for a short time before her egg is rendered infertile by the mismatch.

Would love to hear more about women's experiences here who have tried getting pregnant with their partner while still regularly zoo-active.
 
nekdoneco123 said:
oh, i was just giving dumb answer to a dumb question....
Click to expand...
UR20Z said:
Ask a stupid question (Especially a stupid question that gets asked, on average, about 3 times a week? And gets answered almost as many times, in almost as many threads, that can all be found using the search function) get a stupid answer...
Click to expand...
Well then way to go so simply tell someone they are dumb for asking a question that might be very clear to you.

And IF this particular question has already been asked and answered, instead of calling it out, and potentially the person asking the question, out for being dumb and hence they might take it very harsch.

Since you never know how that person might react and it also makes you look rude and like an total a-hole as well.

Instead, why not just answer ”No and this question has been both asked and answered before: *Thread examples*”

Much easier response, straight to the point, no hard feelings and no one makes the other, nor themselves, look bad in the end.

Just my 2 cents, seeing as how some users on here reply to different threads and users in general.

At the end of the day, we’re all humans and no one knows everything. But calling someone out publicly for being dumb, might make them fee like nothing.
And meanwhile you might never know that they might actually be having quite an awful day etc and you just make it a lot worse.

It’s not hard to be kind and polite, plus it’s free. So let’s spread that instead of negativity - zoo is already ”unusual” as it is, why make it look even worse by going at each other?
Let’s make zoo and our world a better place instead.
 
Privez said:
Well then way to go so simply tell someone they are dumb for asking a question that might be very clear to you.

And IF this particular question has already been asked and answered, instead of calling it out, and potentially the person asking the question, out for being dumb and hence they might take it very harsch.

Since you never know how that person might react and it also makes you look rude and like an total a-hole as well.

Instead, why not just answer ”No and this question has been both asked and answered before: *Thread examples*”

Much easier response, straight to the point, no hard feelings and no one makes the other, nor themselves, look bad in the end.

Just my 2 cents, seeing as how some users on here reply to different threads and users in general.

At the end of the day, we’re all humans and no one knows everything. But calling someone out publicly for being dumb, might make them fee like nothing.
And meanwhile you might never know that they might actually be having quite an awful day etc and you just make it a lot worse.

It’s not hard to be kind and polite, plus it’s free. So let’s spread that instead of negativity - zoo is already ”unusual” as it is, why make it look even worse by going at each other?
Let’s make zoo and our world a better place instead.
Click to expand...
So, it sure as hell sounds like you think we're supposed to do your research and thinking for you, 'cause you're entitled to have everything you can possibly want or imagine handed to you on a silver platter, huh?

Clue: Lotsa luck with that - you're going to need it.

Clue part 2: If one uses a little common sense, the brains that god/Allah/glub/the FSM/The Great Space Unicorn/The Big Juju In The Sky, or whatever other diety (if any) one believes in gave them, it often ain't hard to answer the question for oneself. And if that fails, if one avails themselves of the modern miracle called "Google" (Or Bing, or duckduckgo, or whatever search engine you like) about 95% of these no-brainer questions can be answered in a few seconds. But, of course, that would take someone being willing to expend the tiny bit of effort required to either think (using the head on their shoulders, rather the one in their pants) or find the knowledge on their own, without resorting to asking an idiot question that's been asked roughly 8.7 bazillion times just in the last month or so, and has probably been answered about 3.8 bazillion times in the same period - *IF* one were to expend the minuscule amount of effort required to actually use the built-into-the-forum search function and get back any of the hundreds, mayhap even thousands, of already existing answers to that question.

Such "gut-level" questions do one thing, and one thing only: Demonstrate that the asker is a lazy twat that wants the world handed to him on a platter, and thus isn't fit for anything but use as a target of mirth.

And for the record, I flat don't give a fuck if someone thinks I'm rude or an asshole because they don't like either the truth, or the way I deliver it. Such entitled shits need to learn to be happy that they got that truth, rather than whining that it wasn't wrapped up in nice shiny paper complete with a bow on top.

You being a case in point - Don't like my advice? Don't read it. Easy-peasy, babe. You're coming here as an "intellectual beggar", and instead of being thankful for whatever scraps you're lucky enough to have tossed your way, you try to demand that you be served a 12 course banquet on Spode china and the finest linen. It don't work that way, kiddo. Ever heard the line "Beggars can't be choosers"? Then to add insult to injury, you come back all butt-hurt and complaining that you got handed a PB&J sandwich and a juice-box instead of a plate of cooked-to-order surf-n-turf with all the trimmings and a fine wine??? THE NERVE!!! The sheer, unadulterated ENTITLEMENT involved in such thinking (if it can even be CALLED "thinking") absolutely boggles the mind!
 
UR20Z said:
So, it sure as hell sounds like you think we're supposed to do your research and thinking for you, 'cause you're entitled to have everything you can possibly want or imagine handed to you on a silver platter, huh?

Clue: Lotsa luck with that - you're going to need it.

Clue part 2: If one uses a little common sense, the brains that god/Allah/glub/the FSM/The Great Space Unicorn/The Big Juju In The Sky, or whatever other diety (if any) one believes in gave them, it often ain't hard to answer the question for oneself. And if that fails, if one avails themselves of the modern miracle called "Google" (Or Bing, or duckduckgo, or whatever search engine you like) about 95% of these no-brainer questions can be answered in a few seconds. But, of course, that would take someone being willing to expend the tiny bit of effort required to either think (using the head on their shoulders, rather the one in their pants) or find the knowledge on their own, without resorting to asking an idiot question that's been asked roughly 8.7 bazillion times just in the last month or so, and has probably been answered about 3.8 bazillion times in the same period - *IF* one were to expend the minuscule amount of effort required to actually use the built-into-the-forum search function and get back any of the hundreds, mayhap even thousands, of already existing answers to that question.

Such "gut-level" questions do one thing, and one thing only: Demonstrate that the asker is a lazy twat that wants the world handed to him on a platter, and thus isn't fit for anything but use as a target of mirth.

And for the record, I flat don't give a fuck if someone thinks I'm rude or an asshole because they don't like either the truth, or the way I deliver it. Such entitled shits need to learn to be happy that they got that truth, rather than whining that it wasn't wrapped up in nice shiny paper complete with a bow on top.

You being a case in point - Don't like my advice? Don't read it. Easy-peasy, babe. You're coming here as an "intellectual beggar", and instead of being thankful for whatever scraps you're lucky enough to have tossed your way, you try to demand that you be served a 12 course banquet on Spode china and the finest linen. It don't work that way, kiddo. Ever heard the line "Beggars can't be choosers"? Then to add insult to injury, you come back all butt-hurt and complaining that you got handed a PB&J sandwich and a juice-box instead of a plate of cooked-to-order surf-n-turf with all the trimmings and a fine wine??? THE NERVE!!! The sheer, unadulterated ENTITLEMENT involved in such thinking (if it can even be CALLED "thinking") absolutely boggles the mind!
Click to expand...
you were supposed to have an epiphany and completely change.... geez, read the room.
 
WuzzleFuzzle said:
Yes and No. If the idea is to find out can an animal's sperm penetrate and fertilize an egg: then yes some species can cross fertilize each others gametes. With regard to hyoomans we can cross fertilize with canines, bovines, equines and at least a few others. Fertilization however needs to be understood as one event in the sequence of zygote/fetal development. The fact of fertilization DOES NOT guarantee that the resulting zygoyr will survive and develop to maturity. So if you are considering the act of fertilization to coloquially be taken as "being pregnant" then yes, within certain species combinations. But strictly speaking the answer would almost certainly be no. Technically getting pregnant is a systemic condition induced when a fertilized egg implants in uterine wall. Since it is incredibly unlikely that an extreme cross species fertilized egg will survive to implantation. Then the systemic condition which we call pregnancy will not take place. Hope that clarifies it.
Click to expand...
Exactly. The egg can be fertilized but due to incompatible dna it will not multiple and divide. Essentially it renders the egg sterile. In some cases, it will cause the female to produce the hormone that indicates pregnancy- but eno of the day you just have an egg that is sterile
 
nekdoneco123 said:
you were supposed to have an epiphany and completely change.... geez, read the room.
Click to expand...

Mea culpa... Forgive me, your highness - I'll hurry off and tell the headsman that my flogging should commence immediately, and proceed until no less than 40 strokes have been applied, or the sun goes down, whichever comes first.

N N OOO TTTTT !!
NN N O O T !!
N N N O O T !!
N N N O O T !!
N N N O O T !!
N NN O O T
N N OOO T !!
 
UR20Z said:
Mea culpa... Forgive me, your highness - I'll hurry off and tell the headsman that my flogging should commence immediately, and proceed until no less than 40 strokes have been applied, or the sun goes down, whichever comes first.

N N OOO TTTTT !!
NN N O O T !!
N N N O O T !!
N N N O O T !!
N N N O O T !!
N NN O O T
N N OOO T !!
Click to expand...
You are in luck. The sun sets in 2 minutes (somewhere in the world) ?
 
sarahsingletono98 said:
Exactly. The egg can be fertilized but due to incompatible dna it will not multiple and divide. Essentially it renders the egg sterile. In some cases, it will cause the female to produce the hormone that indicates pregnancy- but eno of the day you just have an egg that is sterile
Click to expand...
Somehow, you spelled "dead" as "sterile" - But close enough for government work... :)
 
UR20Z said:
<snort> Can't say I blame ya for that one... It is a rather vile insult to be applying to actual rational, thinking human beings, ain't it? :devilish:
Click to expand...
Yes yes it is. I would like to think I have a left and right brain cell and both are currently working.
 
UR20Z said:
Only by deluded idiots that think the chance of a woman getting pregnant by fucking a dog can be expressed using a number larger than 0.00
Click to expand...
But some study in Dogostan in 1988 showed promise that there was a 2.4 percent chance of dog sperm Zerg rushing the filament all together could brake it. /sarcasm. However. We know the fuckers go into the womb and go everywhere and anywhere for a couple days and that’s cool as hell. Especially the absorption part of 150 mil-liters of dog sperm making it into the womb, 200/300 million just up where it counts for 72 hours trying to do what they were meant to. All the while the woman is going to work, driving the car pool of kids, going to the bar and meeting people, what ever. They are up where they got the entire time searching and doing there job. That’s cool as hell and they deserve to be absorbed Work well done Zinc for the immune system to boot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top