• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Bestiality in mainstream media

mntrtwke said:
Can the Spanish members please provide an explanation?

Title: La criatura


la criatura.jpg
Click to expand...
Well, as a Spanish native I have been tempted on add my own subtitles to this movie, so everyone can enjoy this true GEM.

"The Creature" is the ONLY mainstream movie I know of that deals openly with zoosexuality. To be more specific, of women attracted to dogs.

To add historical context, this Spanish film was filmed in 1977, shortly after the death of dictator Francisco Franco, thereby ending the former far-right political regime, which had strong ties to Catholic authorities. These were times of little freedom in almost all aspects of life, not to mention oppression and harassment of dissidents.

With the new times, Spanish society was experiencing a need to recover all the freedom lost in recent decades, including of course the private lifestyle and sexuality. The films were a reflection of this and after years of severe censorship, many topics that were taboo were shown openly. Topics such as sex outside of marriage, homosexuality, transvestism, threesomes, etc. They were represented daily in conventional films.

There was a certain desire to produce and consume this type of subjects. Sometimes for purely commercial or morbid reasons, but many films had a marked character of social denunciation and the desire to educate society on issues that until then had been impossible to discuss. In this way, there were many films that dealt in a deep and sincere way with the problems faced by the homosexual community, or transgender people.
This particular film went even further, openly dealing with the vicissitudes of the zoosexual community, and specifically women who are attracted to dogs. As I already said, and I must insist, the film is mainstream, and approaches the subject from the least morbid perspective possible. This differentiates it, in my opinion, from other films such as the Italian film "Bestialitá" (1976).

Over the years, the meaning of this film has been redirected to something purely symbolic, with the zoophilic background as a mere allegory of other social and political subthemes of the moment. It's not like that at all. Eloy de la Iglesia was, in fact, a homosexual activist himself, well known for his taste for discussing controversial issues without resorting to symbolism. It dealt with raw topics such as homosexuality, poverty, margination, drugs, and crime. And this is his film where he deals with zoosexuality. It's basically Eloy de la Iglesia saying "hey, hey... these people exist too. They could be your neighbor. Have a little respect because they deserve to live their lives."

Also to be mentioned that the cast is full of well known Spanish actors and actresses. Ana Belén, who plays the role of Cristina, the main character, is one of the most important and recognizable artist in Spain (she is actress and singer). By any means this is a minor movie in Spanish film industry.

To summarize the plot (ALERT, SPOILERS AHEAD): Cristina is a married woman, who does not feel any affection towards her husband. The couple has been trying to have a child for a long time, without success. After some time, he finally gets Cristina pregnant. But unfortunately she has an abortion caused by an incident she experienced with a dog at a gas station. This traumatic episode awakens in Cristina a strange and until then unknown fascination with dogs (it is not clear if it was something latent).

Shortly after the abortion, the couple decides to spend a day at the beach. Cristina becomes infatuated with a young dog that wanders around the area apparently without an owner, and convinces her husband to take him home and adopt him.

From then on, everything is unleashed for the woman, who experiences a roller coaster of emotions. Al treats the dog like the son they didn't have (he even gives him the name they had planned for the baby), showering him with attention that he never offered to the husband, and to his chagrin, who sees how he is little by little replaced by the animal.

Cristina's fascination with the dog soon begins to take on a sexual aspect, with teasing, foreplay, and naked wrestling. In the film there are no explicit scenes, everything is suggested, but it makes it very clear that the woman has taken the step of having intercourse with the dog on a regular basis.

The husband, meanwhile, is not ignorant of Cristina's lifestyle, and witnesses as a passive spectator the romance between his wife and the dog, in their own house, although he does not dare to openly discuss the subject with his wife.

Finally, the man devises a plan to separate the dog from the woman, bringing a female dog to his house so that the animal loses interest in Cristina and keeps him away from her. The result is that Cristina has a fit of jealousy, and the rivalry of both females ends up with the bitch killed.

Frustrated at not being able to handle the situation, he turns to alcohol. One night he comes home drunk and plays a practical joke on his wife, mocking her zoophilic attraction. An argument begins between the two and ends up with the man sexually abusing the woman.

After this episode there is a period of tense calm. The husband seeks the advice of a priest, who recommends that he permanently keep the dog away from the wife. Specifically, we recommend giving the dog up for adoption to a woman he knows, a middle-aged single woman who lives as a school teacher in a town, outside the city.

Despite her own wishes, Cristina accepts, believing that her zoophilic love will never be accepted in society. And perhaps also to save it from the husband's anger, since another episode of violence could end the animal's life.

Cristina and her husband visit the lady in the town, to leave the dog with her. Cristina is going through a very hard time in the face of the imminent separation, and her sadness does not go unnoticed by the lady. The teacher, in an act of deep empathy, tells Cristina: "I know it's hard. Believe me. I know that many people don't understand our feelings." This implies the lady is also a zoophile.

On a personal note, I would like to say that this scene demonstrates precisely the sensitivity and genuinely zoophilic background of the film. For the average viewer, the teacher's phrase goes unnoticed, as it would no longer be a common comment from a regular pet-lover. But for the keenest viewer it clearly implies a moment of deep connection between two zoophilic women, who recognize each other and must speak in hidden code, in plain sight.

Cristina did not respond to the woman, but she understood that she was giving her dog to another zoophile. In her dreams, she imagines the two of them having sex, which torments her and fills her with jealousy.

After having a nightmare, Cristina wakes up and receives a call from her doctor, who gives her the news that she is pregnant.

Here we have a movie ending that I would personally classify as "zoophilic fantasy." Once again, the average viewer will be left with the superficial message. But what the end of the film implies is that Cristina convinces herself from the first moment that she is pregnant with the dog, not with her husband.

Events are triggered. Cristina rushes to rescue her dog from the teacher. The reunion between the two is very emotional. After that, he packs his bags and goes to live in a country house with the animal, far from the city, far from society, without censorship. Only the woman and the dog. The husband resigns himself to the situation, knowing that he has lost his wife at the hands of the dog.

The ending is, as I said before, a zoophilic fantasy. A wink to all those women who confess that their impossible wish is to get pregnant with a dog. This movie makes it possible. Cristina, in an advanced state of pregnancy, plays happily with the dog. It's their new happy life, a happy ending.

The last shot of the film is Cristina's very pregnant belly. Once again, an innocent image for the average viewer, but for us the inevitable question arises: "Could it not be true that she is really pregnant with her dog?" There's a reason the movie is called "The Creature."

As an added note, the song that plays in the background is a romantic melody that talks about loves that cannot be, and how time is lost to have children and a life together, which never comes back. In short, you have to take advantage of the moment with the one you love.

A true movie made for zoophiles, with obvious hidden codes that make it suitable for the mainstream.
 
Last edited:
turria said:
Well, as a Spanish native I have been tempted on add my own subtitles to this movie, so everyone can enjoy this true GEM.

"The Creature" is the ONLY mainstream movie I know of that deals openly with zoosexuality. To be more specific, of women attracted to dogs.

To add historical context, this Spanish film was filmed in 1977, shortly after the death of dictator Francisco Franco, thereby ending the former far-right political regime, which had strong ties to Catholic authorities. These were times of little freedom in almost all aspects of life, not to mention oppression and harassment of dissidents.

With the new times, Spanish society was experiencing a need to recover all the freedom lost in recent decades, including of course the private lifestyle and sexuality. The films were a reflection of this and after years of severe censorship, many topics that were taboo were shown openly. Topics such as sex outside of marriage, homosexuality, transvestism, threesomes, etc. They were represented daily in conventional films.

There was a certain desire to produce and consume this type of subjects. Sometimes for purely commercial or morbid reasons, but many films had a marked character of social denunciation and the desire to educate society on issues that until then had been impossible to discuss. In this way, there were many films that dealt in a deep and sincere way with the problems faced by the homosexual community, or transgender people.
This particular film went even further, openly dealing with the vicissitudes of the zoosexual community, and specifically women who are attracted to dogs. As I already said, and I must insist, the film is mainstream, and approaches the subject from the least morbid perspective possible. This differentiates it, in my opinion, from other films such as the Italian film "Bestialitá" (1976).

Over the years, the meaning of this film has been redirected to something purely symbolic, with the zoophilic background as a mere allegory of other social and political subthemes of the moment. It's not like that at all. Eloy de la Iglesia was, in fact, a homosexual activist himself, well known for his taste for discussing controversial issues without resorting to symbolism. It dealt with raw topics such as homosexuality, poverty, margination, drugs, and crime. And this is his film where he deals with zoosexuality. It's basically Eloy de la Iglesia saying "hey, hey... these people exist too. They could be your neighbor. Have a little respect because they deserve to live their lives."

Also to be mentioned that the cast is full of well known Spanish actors and actresses. Ana Belén, who plays the role of Cristina, the main character, is one of the most important and recognizable artist in Spain (she is actress and singer). By any means this is a minor movie in Spanish film industry.

To summarize the plot (ALERT, SPOILERS AHEAD): Cristina is a married woman, who does not feel any affection towards her husband. The couple has been trying to have a child for a long time, without success. After some time, he finally gets Cristina pregnant. But unfortunately she has an abortion caused by an incident she experienced with a dog at a gas station. This traumatic episode awakens in Cristina a strange and until then unknown fascination with dogs (it is not clear if it was something latent).

Shortly after the abortion, the couple decides to spend a day at the beach. Cristina becomes infatuated with a young dog that wanders around the area apparently without an owner, and convinces her husband to take him home and adopt him.

From then on, everything is unleashed for the woman, who experiences a roller coaster of emotions. Al treats the dog like the son they didn't have (he even gives him the name they had planned for the baby), showering him with attention that he never offered to the husband, and to his chagrin, who sees how he is little by little replaced by the animal.

Cristina's fascination with the dog soon begins to take on a sexual aspect, with teasing, foreplay, and naked wrestling. In the film there are no explicit scenes, everything is suggested, but it makes it very clear that the woman has taken the step of having intercourse with the dog on a regular basis.

The husband, meanwhile, is not ignorant of Cristina's lifestyle, and witnesses as a passive spectator the romance between his wife and the dog, in their own house, although he does not dare to openly discuss the subject with his wife.

Finally, the man devises a plan to separate the dog from the woman, bringing a female dog to his house so that the animal loses interest in Cristina and keeps him away from her. The result is that Cristina has a fit of jealousy, and the rivalry of both females ends up with the bitch killed.

Frustrated at not being able to handle the situation, he turns to alcohol. One night he comes home drunk and plays a practical joke on his wife, mocking her zoophilic attraction. An argument begins between the two and ends up with the man sexually abusing the woman.

After this episode there is a period of tense calm. The husband seeks the advice of a priest, who recommends that he permanently keep the dog away from the wife. Specifically, we recommend giving the dog up for adoption to a woman he knows, a middle-aged single woman who lives as a school teacher in a town, outside the city.

Despite her own wishes, Cristina accepts, believing that her zoophilic love will never be accepted in society. And perhaps also to save it from the husband's anger, since another episode of violence could end the animal's life.

Cristina and her husband visit the lady in the town, to leave the dog with her. Cristina is going through a very hard time in the face of the imminent separation, and her sadness does not go unnoticed by the lady. The teacher, in an act of deep empathy, tells Cristina: "I know it's hard. Believe me. I know that many people don't understand our feelings." This implies the lady is also a zoophile.

On a personal note, I would like to say that this scene demonstrates precisely the sensitivity and genuinely zoophilic background of the film. For the average viewer, the teacher's phrase goes unnoticed, as it would no longer be a common comment from a regular pet-lover. But for the keenest viewer it clearly implies a moment of deep connection between two zoophilic women, who recognize each other and must speak in hidden code, in plain sight.

Cristina did not respond to the woman, but she understood that she was giving her dog to another zoophile. In her dreams, she imagines the two of them having sex, which torments her and fills her with jealousy.

After having a nightmare, Cristina wakes up and receives a call from her doctor, who gives her the news that she is pregnant.

Here we have a movie ending that I would personally classify as "zoophilic fantasy." Once again, the average viewer will be left with the superficial message. But what the end of the film implies is that Cristina convinces herself from the first moment that she is pregnant with the dog, not with her husband.

Events are triggered. Cristina rushes to rescue her dog from the teacher. The reunion between the two is very emotional. After that, he packs his bags and goes to live in a country house with the animal, far from the city, far from society, without censorship. Only the woman and the dog. The husband resigns himself to the situation, knowing that he has lost his wife at the hands of the dog.

The ending is, as I said before, a zoophilic fantasy. A wink to all those women who confess that their impossible wish is to get pregnant with a dog. This movie makes it possible. Cristina, in an advanced state of pregnancy, plays happily with the dog. It's their new happy life, a happy ending.

The last shot of the film is Cristina's very pregnant belly. Once again, an innocent image for the average viewer, but for us the inevitable question arises: "Could it not be true that she is really pregnant with her dog?" There's a reason the movie is called "The Creature."

As an added note, the song that plays in the background is a romantic melody that talks about loves that cannot be, and how time is lost to have children and a life together, which never comes back. In short, you have to take advantage of the moment with the one you love.

A true movie made for zoophiles, with obvious hidden codes that make it suitable for the mainstream.
Click to expand...
Thank you for sharing your interpretation.
 
Louis Belmont said:
Thank you for sharing your interpretation.
Click to expand...

turria said:
Well, as a Spanish native I have been tempted on add my own subtitles to this movie, so everyone can enjoy this true GEM.

"The Creature" is the ONLY mainstream movie I know of that deals openly with zoosexuality. To be more specific, of women attracted to dogs.

To add historical context, this Spanish film was filmed in 1977, shortly after the death of dictator Francisco Franco, thereby ending the former far-right political regime, which had strong ties to Catholic authorities. These were times of little freedom in almost all aspects of life, not to mention oppression and harassment of dissidents.

With the new times, Spanish society was experiencing a need to recover all the freedom lost in recent decades, including of course the private lifestyle and sexuality. The films were a reflection of this and after years of severe censorship, many topics that were taboo were shown openly. Topics such as sex outside of marriage, homosexuality, transvestism, threesomes, etc. They were represented daily in conventional films.

There was a certain desire to produce and consume this type of subjects. Sometimes for purely commercial or morbid reasons, but many films had a marked character of social denunciation and the desire to educate society on issues that until then had been impossible to discuss. In this way, there were many films that dealt in a deep and sincere way with the problems faced by the homosexual community, or transgender people.
This particular film went even further, openly dealing with the vicissitudes of the zoosexual community, and specifically women who are attracted to dogs. As I already said, and I must insist, the film is mainstream, and approaches the subject from the least morbid perspective possible. This differentiates it, in my opinion, from other films such as the Italian film "Bestialitá" (1976).

Over the years, the meaning of this film has been redirected to something purely symbolic, with the zoophilic background as a mere allegory of other social and political subthemes of the moment. It's not like that at all. Eloy de la Iglesia was, in fact, a homosexual activist himself, well known for his taste for discussing controversial issues without resorting to symbolism. It dealt with raw topics such as homosexuality, poverty, margination, drugs, and crime. And this is his film where he deals with zoosexuality. It's basically Eloy de la Iglesia saying "hey, hey... these people exist too. They could be your neighbor. Have a little respect because they deserve to live their lives."

Also to be mentioned that the cast is full of well known Spanish actors and actresses. Ana Belén, who plays the role of Cristina, the main character, is one of the most important and recognizable artist in Spain (she is actress and singer). By any means this is a minor movie in Spanish film industry.

To summarize the plot (ALERT, SPOILERS AHEAD): Cristina is a married woman, who does not feel any affection towards her husband. The couple has been trying to have a child for a long time, without success. After some time, he finally gets Cristina pregnant. But unfortunately she has an abortion caused by an incident she experienced with a dog at a gas station. This traumatic episode awakens in Cristina a strange and until then unknown fascination with dogs (it is not clear if it was something latent).

Shortly after the abortion, the couple decides to spend a day at the beach. Cristina becomes infatuated with a young dog that wanders around the area apparently without an owner, and convinces her husband to take him home and adopt him.

From then on, everything is unleashed for the woman, who experiences a roller coaster of emotions. Al treats the dog like the son they didn't have (he even gives him the name they had planned for the baby), showering him with attention that he never offered to the husband, and to his chagrin, who sees how he is little by little replaced by the animal.

Cristina's fascination with the dog soon begins to take on a sexual aspect, with teasing, foreplay, and naked wrestling. In the film there are no explicit scenes, everything is suggested, but it makes it very clear that the woman has taken the step of having intercourse with the dog on a regular basis.

The husband, meanwhile, is not ignorant of Cristina's lifestyle, and witnesses as a passive spectator the romance between his wife and the dog, in their own house, although he does not dare to openly discuss the subject with his wife.

Finally, the man devises a plan to separate the dog from the woman, bringing a female dog to his house so that the animal loses interest in Cristina and keeps him away from her. The result is that Cristina has a fit of jealousy, and the rivalry of both females ends up with the bitch killed.

Frustrated at not being able to handle the situation, he turns to alcohol. One night he comes home drunk and plays a practical joke on his wife, mocking her zoophilic attraction. An argument begins between the two and ends up with the man sexually abusing the woman.

After this episode there is a period of tense calm. The husband seeks the advice of a priest, who recommends that he permanently keep the dog away from the wife. Specifically, we recommend giving the dog up for adoption to a woman he knows, a middle-aged single woman who lives as a school teacher in a town, outside the city.

Despite her own wishes, Cristina accepts, believing that her zoophilic love will never be accepted in society. And perhaps also to save it from the husband's anger, since another episode of violence could end the animal's life.

Cristina and her husband visit the lady in the town, to leave the dog with her. Cristina is going through a very hard time in the face of the imminent separation, and her sadness does not go unnoticed by the lady. The teacher, in an act of deep empathy, tells Cristina: "I know it's hard. Believe me. I know that many people don't understand our feelings." This implies the lady is also a zoophile.

On a personal note, I would like to say that this scene demonstrates precisely the sensitivity and genuinely zoophilic background of the film. For the average viewer, the teacher's phrase goes unnoticed, as it would no longer be a common comment from a regular pet-lover. But for the keenest viewer it clearly implies a moment of deep connection between two zoophilic women, who recognize each other and must speak in hidden code, in plain sight.

Cristina did not respond to the woman, but she understood that she was giving her dog to another zoophile. In her dreams, she imagines the two of them having sex, which torments her and fills her with jealousy.

After having a nightmare, Cristina wakes up and receives a call from her doctor, who gives her the news that she is pregnant.

Here we have a movie ending that I would personally classify as "zoophilic fantasy." Once again, the average viewer will be left with the superficial message. But what the end of the film implies is that Cristina convinces herself from the first moment that she is pregnant with the dog, not with her husband.

Events are triggered. Cristina rushes to rescue her dog from the teacher. The reunion between the two is very emotional. After that, he packs his bags and goes to live in a country house with the animal, far from the city, far from society, without censorship. Only the woman and the dog. The husband resigns himself to the situation, knowing that he has lost his wife at the hands of the dog.

The ending is, as I said before, a zoophilic fantasy. A wink to all those women who confess that their impossible wish is to get pregnant with a dog. This movie makes it possible. Cristina, in an advanced state of pregnancy, plays happily with the dog. It's their new happy life, a happy ending.

The last shot of the film is Cristina's very pregnant belly. Once again, an innocent image for the average viewer, but for us the inevitable question arises: "Could it not be true that she is really pregnant with her dog?" There's a reason the movie is called "The Creature."

As an added note, the song that plays in the background is a romantic melody that talks about loves that cannot be, and how time is lost to have children and a life together, which never comes back. In short, you have to take advantage of the moment with the one you love.

A true movie made for zoophiles, with obvious hidden codes that make it suitable for the mainstream.
Click to expand...

Thank you for your incredibly detailed analysis of the film. I appreciate the historical, cultural and social aspects that you explained so thoroughly.

I would certainly welcome your subtitles for this film to understand it and enjoy it better.
 
Wikipedia actually has a category for this, for some reason: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Zoophilia_in_culture

To be honest I imagine it'll eventually be removed, like the "Arguments for" section of the "Zoophilia" article was, but it's here for the time being. It's also far from complete. But kind of interesting?

As a sidenote, if you want to add a page to this category, you have to add it to the page itself, not the category page. The following wikicode should be added to the bottom of the page:
Code: 
[[Category:Zoophilia in culture]]
 
MasterKnight42 said:
There was a movie a few years ago directed by Bobcat Goldwaite called “Sleeping Dogs Lie”. The main character gives her dog a blow job while in college and is guilty about it. Then tries to keep it a secret but confides in her boyfriend what she did while in college.
Click to expand...
I have this on DVD. No real sex but the whole movie centers around her confessing to sucking her dogs dick to her fiancee. Actually a pretty entertaining movie
 
Dodgeball - main character is woken up by dog licking his 'junk'. Later on the movie has a scene with a filthy guy with big dog on a chain watching a young guy clean his car in a very suggestive way. Third is a guy yelling out he saw a man satistfying a camel with his mouth.
 
gizzwhizz said:
I have this on DVD. No real sex but the whole movie centers around her confessing to sucking her dogs dick to her fiancee. Actually a pretty entertaining movie
Click to expand...
This movie is the reality of many women around the world. A girl alone at home with her dog and....well, we already know what will happen ?
 
National Lampoon’s Another Dirty Movie (2012)-There’s a sex scene on a porn set between a woman and a horse. The whole movie has a super low budget feel so the scene is poorly edited in terms of sound and movement
 
misty said:
Has anybody else noticed all the references to bestiality in movies and TV?
Case one: Family Guy. Brian the dog gets laid a lot. He's even been with Glen Quagmires post op male to female dad. In one episode he's trying to get with a college girl and Stewie makes the comment to the girl "is this what your parents are spending all this money for so you can f--k dogs?" DOGS!! WITH A *S* Implying Brian isn't the first.
Case two: American Dad. The fish is always trying to look up Francine's dress. Steve, the son, has a obvious incest vibe for her. In one episode he even states the color of his mom's lipstick is dog dick red or dog pud red in the edited version. In another episode he gives his mother a hug good bye as she and Stan prepare to go out on a horse drawn carriage ride to a horse show and he notices she isn't wearing panties. When he asks her she replies with "what's the point?" The entire episode lends to the notion Francine has a thing for horses.
Case three: Seth McFarland 1000s ways to die in the west. He makes the comment about one of his sheep getting loose, ending up in the whore house and somehow making $20. I guess if you are in a Seth McFarland production, you will be subject to incest and bestiality. Dirty boy, Seth.
Anybody else have anything to add to the list?
Click to expand...
There’s an Australian show called “Rake” which is actually really good it’s about a lawyer and the interesting cases he represents. In one of the cases a doctor and his wife are in trouble for making a dvd of their big rottie screwing the wife. The doctor has his briefcase stolen and the dvd was in it which gets handed to police. The wife keeps sleeping with the dog even after they get caught
 
stallionsimp said:
National Lampoon’s Another Dirty Movie (2012)-There’s a sex scene on a porn set between a woman and a horse. The whole movie has a super low budget feel so the scene is poorly edited in terms of sound and movement
Click to expand...
oh? which minutes of the film was that in?
 
This sexy youtuber has some very suggestive clips, anyone know who she is?

Here's a couple ?

- YouTube

W YouTube możesz cieszyć się filmami i muzyką, które lubisz, przesyłać oryginalne treści i udostępniać je swoim bliskim, znajomym i całemu światu.
youtube.com youtube.com

- YouTube

W YouTube możesz cieszyć się filmami i muzyką, które lubisz, przesyłać oryginalne treści i udostępniać je swoim bliskim, znajomym i całemu światu.
youtube.com youtube.com
 
Frozen has been mentioned before, but the Broadway version actually takes the implications further. In one of the new songs, Anna asks Kristoff "Have you even kissed a girl? I mean a human girl" to which he replies "Oh..."
 
mntrtwke said:

From piotrohanian's list​


Emanuelle in America (1977)

Director Joe D'Amato

Writers Maria Pia Fusco, Ottavio Alessi, Piero Vivarelli

Stars Laura Gemser, Gabriele Tinti, Roger Browne

Hedonistic photojournalist Emanuelle goes undercover to expose the seedy lives of rich and powerful sex cultists and snuff film peddlers in America and Europe.

People are shown watching from outside a stable, as a naked woman walks over to a horse and begins to caress it, then the woman starts masturbating the horse, whose erect penis can be see.


View attachment 465235



View attachment 465236
Click to expand...
They went a lil heavy on the horse noises. ?
 
Dirty Love - Frank Zappa and the Mothers of Invention. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meBpzffD1Tk

Give me
Your dirty love
Like you might surrender
To some dragon in your dreams
Give me
Your dirty love
Like a pink donation
To the dragon in your dreams

I don't need your sweet devotion
I don't want your cheap emotion
Just whip me up some dragon lotion
For your dirty love

Give me
Your dirty love
Like some tacky little pamphlet
In your daddy's bottom drawer
Give me
Your dirty love
I don't believe you have ever seen
That book before

I don't need no consolation
I don't want your reservation
I only got one destination
An' that's your dirty love

Give me
Your dirty love
Just like your mama
Make her fuzzy poodle do
Give me
Your dirty love
The way your mama
Make that nasty poodle chew

I'll ignore your cheap aroma
And your little-bo-peep diploma
I'll just put you in a coma
With some dirty love

THE POODLE BITES!
(Come on, Frenchie)
THE POODLE CHEWS IT!
(Snap it!)
THE POODLE BITES!
(Come on, Frenchie)
THE POODLE CHEWS IT!
(Snap it!)
 
Here are some scenes for instance that I find sometimes

likestowatchinnc said:
In the horror movie "Cabin Fever" (2002) one of the male characters talks about his dog licking him while he's masturbating and then just before he comes the dog sticks its nose into his ass.
Click to expand...
at what mintue mark in Cabin fever
 

Attachments

  • Supertroopers2-erikstolhanske-sf-hd-08-hd.mp4
    5.6 MB
  • SWEET MUD full film 97m, Eng Titles, Writer_Director_ Dror Shaul on Vimeo - Google Chrome 2023...mp4
    34.3 MB
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top