allistair_crowe443
Tourist
My mistake. It was dartel, not you. Sorry.
Either way, FORBIDDEN_WEBSITE! is a little too good to be true,
Banned Websites
- Thread starter dogluver101
- Start date
Either way, FORBIDDEN_WEBSITE! is a little too good to be true,
dartel
Prized Citizen of ZV
No, there's malicious site code and ads that will infect your computer just by visiting it.
Ted Danson Machine
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
dam you're good.
Another candidate:
FORBIDDEN_WEBSITE! (can not even spell it right in the url, idiots)
Search hit for probably every single variety of animal abuse explicitly mentioned in our rules + all the the possibilities of bound horses and classic commercial crap as well.
In my modest opinion, instead of banning every single website that may somehow violate the rules, with is meanless, I would like to propose other solution - that the links would get a disclamer that they may contain such content and that user is watching it on own responsibility. Additionally, only the websites that contain malicious code shoułd be banned.
Explanation:
Neither the ZV staff, viewing user, nor the website isn't having powers to predict what will be published on it
I have an even better solution, install a forum plugin that automatically prevents you from posting a link which is on the list. Instead of a plugin that adds your text. And if you choose to circumvent the system by deliberately encoding the url in some cryptic form -> warning point, just like we do with IM names. @ZTHorse
Your solution does not work since this forum houses hundreds of people who do not absolutely care about animals and will happily promote, watch and praise animal abuse and use this website as their porn source.
I do not think we should make it easier for them.
They will still be able to watch those sites, but those sites will have no publicity on a zoo forum.
Your solution does not work since this forum houses hundreds of people who do not absolutely care about animals and will happily promote, watch and praise animal abuse and use this website as their porn source.
I do not think we should make it easier for them.
They will still be able to watch those sites, but those sites will have no publicity on a zoo forum.
Last edited:
actually, many people have a opinion that zoophilia itself, independantly from it's form is a animal abuse and they put all of it into one bag.
In my opinion, if the animal isn't becoming hurt, beaten, scared, starved, drugged, killed or else way badly (aspecially brutally) treated then such content shouldn't be banned.
There are many nice zoo websites on with some one had on propouse published controversial content to get the sitebanned from forums that not many persones get know about the sites.
I think that sites that contain some controversial cotent (exceptentioned above) among many other should be be put on a "gray list'" instead of beeing blocked
dartel
Prized Citizen of ZV
I think if you want porn you should just go to those porn sites and this site out of it.
It's more then obvious that this forum is a place for people who like animals in a special way and who share related to it content. In the "Link dump" forum are also links to the websites that contai ln content that you has refered with the term "porn".
The way you had formed your answer sounded hypocritically since you're a member here as well.
dartel
Prized Citizen of ZV
Not hypocritical at all. I'm here for this site and this community, not to find and/or share other sites.
Most of the mods would prefer the link dump section not even exist at all, but then all that crap and stupidity would be spilling out all over the rest of the site. Best keep it contained if you must have it.
Any time I click on one of those porn links, I feel sorry for my CPU. My router probably has a mental disorder already and sometimes requires a reset. It is pure electronic torture. Let alone how inconvenient it is to review off site porn.
Every time I review off site porn links I check it for banned content, most of the time I don't have to look very hard to find shit that would get someone permanently banned just for uploading it here.
Case in point with the latest banned site, on the front page alone there were chicken videos, two with calves and at least one live insertion, so yes I recommended that it be added to the banned list.
Case in point with the latest banned site, on the front page alone there were chicken videos, two with calves and at least one live insertion, so yes I recommended that it be added to the banned list.
Oh yeah, I forgot to make a public announcement about that.
So here it is... the reason FORBIDDEN_WEBSITE! was originally banned was for hosting shitty and abusive porn content, under no circumstances will the abuse be tolerated here which is why FORBIDDEN_WEBSITE! was added. That being said, if you happen to post a link from one of the banned websites you're often not going to receive a warning strike as long as the content shared doesn't happen to be abusive, or you don't post said links repeatedly after receiving a verbal warning not to post it again. The only thing the user will lose is their brownie reaction points gained from posting the link. Otherwise you'll need to go fap to something else. There's plenty of non-abusive content in the porn section to stroke you willie to or massage your clit to.
I also changed the thread title from "Site Banned" to "Banned Sites" since there is a growing list of them now.
allistair_crowe443
Tourist
Wait…I’ve never seen any CP on FORBIDDEN_WEBSITE!. When did this happen?
This also includes cp adverts in the comments.
But zx18 is so full of animal abuse, that regardless of the adverts, it is a shit site.
Gregory
Tourist
Same, and I have never seen CP adverts in the comments. But someone apparently has so thats why it is banned. They now require a login in an effort I assume to thwart would be CP posters. So they are aware of the issue and taking active steps to correct it. Plenty of other pages though, no need for it to come back.
There has been CP adverts posted here (that admin thankfully always handle right away), does that mean this website has to ban itself? Asking for the devils advocate lol (this is tongue in cheek don't ban me
)
Reconscope
Supreme Citizen of ZV
Difference is z18 allow destructive content to exist while this website takes actual precautions to get rid of cancers that cause/spread it's message.Same, and I have never seen CP adverts in the comments. But someone apparently has so thats why it is banned. They now require a login in an effort I assume to thwart would be CP posters. So they are aware of the issue and taking active steps to correct it. Plenty of other pages though, no need for it to come back.
There has been CP adverts posted here (that admin thankfully always handle right away), does that mean this website has to ban itself? Asking for the devils advocate lol (this is tongue in cheek don't ban me
I mean what sane person would bear to hear a animal's sad noise.
I don't understand how these freaks can do that. If she's crying, whimpering, yelling, yowling and fighting back she does NOT want you to proceed.
NerdNeck
Tourist
Shit, I didn't know FORBIDDEN_WEBSITE! hosted CP. Thanks for the warning, I'll be staying well away.
Goattobeloved
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
@staff
Thought you might just use the profanity/censorship forum function, making an entry for banned sites names?
Anyone can just unknowingly link a video from banned site, but if it is automatically censored, one *should* thing there is something wrong in it.
People could sure write x(17+1) or use a redirection server but that would proof intentionallity on bypassing it
Thought you might just use the profanity/censorship forum function, making an entry for banned sites names?
Anyone can just unknowingly link a video from banned site, but if it is automatically censored, one *should* thing there is something wrong in it.
People could sure write x(17+1) or use a redirection server but that would proof intentionallity on bypassing it
That'd be too easy........
greymananon
Lurker
Thanks for the heads up my friend