Cookiecaretaker
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
I am disgusted everytime i see that random nakked moneky thingy 
thats why i suggest to make it a new rulePenis / Vulgar Avatar Profile picture.
Seriously men, do you think any female want to see this ? Do you think this is how you meet woman ? Are you so socially backward how you present youself is a picture of a penis ? Ever stop to wonder why you never attract opposite sex ? Nobody want to see you picture of butt or penis. How...www.zoovilleforum.net
Cookies are off-topic on this forum. Should there be a rule against those as a profile pic, as well?I am disgusted everytime i see that random nakked moneky thingy![]()
I would limit it to human only.Cookies are off-topic on this forum. Should there be a rule against those as a profile pic, as well?
superglue and spraypaint helps thereLots of people have also their rectal openings as PFP.![]()
I'd do it for a prank, but I'd want to change it back after. ?This is one of those topic titles where it would crack me up if the next time I looked, everybody's profile image was a dick pic. ?
That's actually a pretty good point, not gonna lie.I think them being allowed makes it easier to understand who you're talking to. Here for discussion, or here because horny?
The practical implementation of this would be very time consuming.If the rule might be changed, why not make it all avatars have to be non-revealing, end of story. People could then upload the pictures of their or their animal's junk in the appropriate forum section.
The result would be those who don't want to be bombarded with it wouldn't, while those who do want to participate in that can pursue it in the easily found designated areas which already exist.
Everybody wins.
I guess that would kill the friendly reputation of this SiteI offered a suggestion. I didn't say it would be easy or even that you guys have to do it. Just a suggestion.
I used to participate in a relationship discussion forum and their policy was simple - "junk" as an avatar, banned. No warnings, no pleading, no begging. And they banned a ton of people too. They took a hard-line approach where "not reading the rules = dipshit" and they didn't view it as their problem or responsibility when consequences were doled out. They took that approach with certain subject matter as well.
The benefit was the majority of people participating had read the rules and were following or going with a more obvious, basic rule of "treat others the way I'd like to be treated". Minus the occasional slip due to emotions running high in the moment. We are human after all.
But, that site was highly focused on discussion, not media.
Anyway, this was just a suggestion, nothing more.
Sorry I edited my message a little and posted the other version while you were writing those linesI don't know about that per se. It might change the focus of the site towards discussion rather than porn and hookups. That decision isn't mine though.
Zoovilles member count would face a huge drop if they banned everyone like that lmao! I bet a good 75%+ can barely read, let alone care to consider rules that they would have to follow. The amount of entitled members here is sickening.I offered a suggestion. I didn't say it would be easy or even that you guys have to do it. Just a suggestion.
I used to participate in a relationship discussion forum and their policy was simple - "junk" as an avatar, banned. No warnings, no pleading, no begging. And they banned a ton of people too. They took a hard-line approach where "not reading the rules = dipshit" and they didn't view it as their problem or responsibility when consequences were doled out. They took that approach with certain subject matter as well.
The benefit was the majority of people participating had read the rules and were following or going with a more obvious, basic rule of "treat others the way I'd like to be treated". Minus the occasional slip due to emotions running high in the moment. We are human after all.
But, that site was highly focused on discussion, not media.
Anyway, this was just a suggestion, nothing more.
This is not a friendly site. The mods here will are fine with that too, and even participate in hacking other members down.I guess that would kill the friendly reputation of this Site
I mean imagine if more than hundred of people getting banned without warning, you can see below their username that they are banned it isn't the best way to appli a rule
The member count dropping would not be a bad thing.That's not true for the whole site, only the dumpster fire section.
Unfortunately, some of it does spill out but to be fair, the mods do generally put a reasonable effort in taming/managing that.
As members we do have some control over it ourselves, where we can click "ignore" on people we just don't really want to see or hear from anymore regardless of our reasons.
One could choose to have thicker skin, or push back, or something else entirely.
It's a "what works for you" more than anything else.
where did you find this meme image?I think it is unlikely. Also you would have to apply that to vag pics as well.
I do not want to see someone's fleshy bits that look like the ham I buy in the local shop either.
View attachment 465143
Generic google search for "ham vagina".where did you find this meme image?
I'm a Lesbian and I feel the same way. I only want to see it... if i *want* to see it.I think it is unlikely. Also you would have to apply that to vag pics as well.
I do not want to see someone's fleshy bits that look like the ham I buy in the local shop either.
Becuase it's the real world equivalent of walking up to someone to have a conversation with them in public with your junk out. A lot of us dont like being forced to participate in someone's exposure/flashing fetish. But when its a profile picture... that's exactly what's happening. Someone gets off on the idea of other people looking at their junk and they force everyone to see it against their will.How about deal with it ? Honestly why people care so much about a profile picture ? Its not even fullscreen, its useless to put this much effort for something barely visible
My point is, why not simply ignoring ? Even if that's disgusting to see for some people ? There's probably worse to take care of in this site rather than just a few junk pictures, I genuinely think removing those who put these pictures is pointlessBecuase it's the real world equivalent of walking up to someone to have a conversation with them in public with your junk out. A lot of us dont like being forced to participate in someone's exposure/flashing fetish. But when its a profile picture... that's exactly what's happening. Someone gets off on the idea of other people looking at their junk and they force everyone to see it against their will.
Also, I don't see why you compare irl, I'm pretty sure these guys have enough decency to not do that in publicMy point is, why not simply ignoring ? Even if that's disgusting to see for some people ? There's probably worse to take care of in this site rather than just a few junk pictures, I genuinely think removing those who put these pictures is pointless
I also would like to add that you joined in 2020 and it has been this way for long and you're probably not the only one. So I'm kinda curious about why that is now a problem today