canecorso
Citizen of Zooville
Almost at the end.At what point is the cartoon bit you described?
Almost at the end.At what point is the cartoon bit you described?
I'm sure they still did it behind closed doors.I believe it was done from people of all different period of times and cultures but after the spread of abrahamic religions it was an big sin to do and the people stick to that till the strict church rule of the middle ages had fallen.
Have you looked at the stuff available at The Wayback and its parent operation? Why would you be surprised that things survive? People are inherently Packrats, attics hold boxes and trunks, what happens when grandpa dies? Museums hold stuff that no one sees. FILMS, such as Napoleon are restored by people who find footage in vey odd places. It would not be hard to add sound to a flick, and unless you SEE the actual film that was used, you have no way of knowing if it was recopied to a magnetic track film, or added via video lan. And remember this....a french whorehouse in Paree has a fucking bench built so that an overweight English King could Do the nasty and get his Ass licked at the same time. They've protected THAT thru TWO World Wars.I'm going to be critical and this might disappoint some people here but...to the best of my film knowledge, that French video is not from that era, it was just filmed to look that way. The "silent era" was just that, silent. Any music that accompanied the films was actually piped in by a pianist playing the music live. And ANY dialogue would have subtitles, they didn't pick and choose. And since the music was seemingly part of the film itself, that's a dead giveaway that it's not from the 1910s or 1920s. It wasn't until The Jazz Singer, released in 1927, that movies started to include sound and/or music and even then it wasn't commonly used for a few more years after that. Also, Steamboat Willie was one of the very first cartoons with sound and/or music, and that came out in 1928 which was 3 years after the supposed last year of that compilation. And I'm almost positive that gloryholes was not a thing back then. But I actually did enjoy the cartoon and its creativeness. But again, the video game Cuphead showed that anyone can recreate the look of 1920s/1930s cartoons. If anyone can prove this wrong, by all means, go ahead. I just don't see how it's possible that a collection of French pornos was able to be preserved in surprisingly high quality for what would have been the time, but also landed in the hands of someone who was able to then upload it onto the internet in 2019.
Youre welcome to disagree, but where do you think those "Rights" movements come from? Europe is absolutely in the Churches' grasp. Pick your flavor, but the history of Crusade is always just under the surface. In the US, today, its even worse. The lunatic fringe is on the march, though theyve been normalized as "the Religious Right"..... they provide leadership and legitimacy to the holy cause of saving us from ourselves. Its not new...messianism is a disease, but in the ancient days, the Essenes had a Messiah school in the dead sea area. Time honors the tradition.Yes, the internet has certainly brought practices that most people didn't even know existed to the spotlight and made it easier to create moral panics. I would however disagree with you when you say that this push comes primarily from religious people. Most countries in Europe are socially liberal and functionally non-religious nowadays and in the US religiosity is dropping fast even if it still a considerable cultural and political force. Furthermore a lot of these anti-bestiality laws are pushed by animal rights activists who want to protect animals from 'rape and abuse' (rather than punish offenses against god and religion). I've even seen gay activists criticize countries like Japan and Hungary because "they ban gay marriage but they still don't have laws against bestiality".
This picture is originally a bronze age stone carving from the west coast of Sweden, to be more precise from Tanum in Bohuslän. The picture was used on the cover of Swedish historian Jens Rydström's PhD-dissertation "Sinners and Citizens. Bestiality and homosexuality in Sweden, 1870-1950."
I think it happened because bestiality was suddenly available on internet.What I find intriguing is that until fairly recently zoophile acts were legal in most places. In fact they were made legal in many countries in the 60s and 70s when sodomy laws were abolished in Europe. Sure, it wasn't exactly socially accepted but it's only since the 2000's that there's suddenly been this huge outcry and push for laws and crackdowns.
Because for most normals, the suffix "-philia" is evocative of "pedophilia" and that's enough to convince them to throw you under the bus.What I find intriguing is that until fairly recently zoophile acts were legal in most places. In fact they were made legal in many countries in the 60s and 70s when sodomy laws were abolished in Europe. Sure, it wasn't exactly socially accepted but it's only since the 2000's that there's suddenly been this huge outcry and push for laws and crackdowns.
Dont know about that, since theres "Philadelphia" " Hemophilia " " Philately" and the like. Unless you were born before the net, you might not realize it, but most of what makes up our little taboo...was never expressly "legal". That is a myth. These acts were just not expressly "Illegal" but were in fact prosecutable under the category "Sodomy"....which was expressed legally as anything other than Missionary Sex. In some States, it's still expressed as such. Laws against a thing usually don't happen until something is perceived to be a problem. While Bestial acts were basically thought of as Mythology, and thus fictional, there was nothing about it to be feared by the outside World. Practitioners were rarely caught, unless they were being sought for other, criminal, acts. One exception to this is Witchcraft, which has been tied by various religions to animals deliberately. Witches have their Fetches....Harry Potter's was Hedwig...who were said to feed at a Witch's Tits, and served as her connection to the Devil.Because for most normals, the suffix "-philia" is evocative of "pedophilia" and that's enough to convince them to throw you under the bus.
Therefore instead of calling it "zoophilia" we should call it "zoosexuality"Because for most normals, the suffix "-philia" is evocative of "pedophilia" and that's enough to convince them to throw you under the bus.
I couldn't find the bat depiction with a human female described. The article could mean this image but probably another with an obvious jaguar is meant.Ancient-Origins.net said:and intercourse between human females and mythical animals (such as the bat and the jaguar who both had special religious connotations in Moche culture).”
Well I included it in the picture in case one our french speakers could read it. I do not know french, and the text is not entirely clear. I read through it at first looking for any mention of the animal, gender, etc... I thought it was far more generic talking about funeral practices and stuff. Here is my copy of the text google translation (I once again repeat I don't know french, I cannot correct the spelling off the top of my head in the cases I couldn't read the letters, don't laugh too hard):Quite beautiful, i would love a replica. What does the text on the first one say?
La ceramique est l'heritage le plus important que nous alent laisse les cultures peruveinnes
Elle est constituee pour une grande part d'offrandes funeralres qui etalent deposees dana les sepultures
Le culte funeralres des anciens peruviens se rattache a la croyance universelle d'une survie outre-tombe, de l'lmmortalite de l'ame, d'une projection de la force vitale au deja de is mort.
Ceramic is the most important heritage that peruvein cultures leave us.
It is made up to a large extent of funeral offerings which are laid down in the sepultures.
The funeral cult of the ancient peruvein is linked to the universal belief of a survival beyond the grave, of the lmmortalite of the soul, of a projection of the vital force to the already of is dead.
Can as well be a dog with small ears or long, even fur. The details are somewhat "off" from reality, the artist might not have had any idea how the dogs are built anatomically, aside from what they saw in terms of the fur. Then it might resemble something of the shape of a Shiba Inu.I think that's a cat, the only indication I have is the ears which are definitely not human.
I don't speak spanish myself, so... anybody here have this book (or are willing to get it)? Can you tell me more it? Does it stand up as historically trustworthy or is it just some pulp fantasy about pervy gauchos?Mas alla de lo que la tradición y el folclore han propuesto y dispuesto sobre la epopeya del hombre rural de la pampa rioplatense, hay otra figura que la realidad histórica la impone.
El Gaucho homofóbico, xenofóbico y machista que ha diseñado el moderno concepto, nada tiene que ver con el hombre real que practicaba sin prejuicios, la homosexualidad, la zoofilia y otros vicios desechables en su concepto moderno.
I have often wondered how many of my relatives were zoos.This was really enlightening. Thank you.
If this had been taught I wouldn’t have missed a dayWow my eyes have been opened, so much history. Hated history in school lol ?
LA VIDA SEXUAL DEL GAUCHO: EL SECRETO DE LA PAMPA eBook : Higgie, Nelida: Amazon.es: Libros
LA VIDA SEXUAL DEL GAUCHO: EL SECRETO DE LA PAMPA eBook : Higgie, Nelida: Amazon.es: Libroswww.amazon.es
I don't speak spanish myself, so... anybody here have this book (or are willing to get it)? Can you tell me more it? Does it stand up as historically trustworthy or is it just some pulp fantasy about pervy gauchos?
no other living thing but animals for miles, no easy access to women.For any spanish speakers around here, have a look at this please:
I haven't read this particular study - my Spanish is still a work in progress - but in one of her articles, Miletski mentioned a study on gauchos in Brazil and Uruguay. This study claimed that "bestiality" was part of the gauchos' lives as a herdsmen's or rural tradition, but only as some sort of initiation and not a regular activity.
Bestiality in roman society was not reserved to the arena and not often used as punishment a number of roman historians wrote in passing on the subject, as did some greek historiansA few years ago, I watch a sensible, normal documentary about Roman gladiators. All good and vanilla (and very interesting). At one point, the aspect of pleasing the crowd was reviewed. This was early showbiz, after all. People wanted to see more ferocious lions, more athletic gladiators, indeed more of everything. If watching humans losing their lives was viewed as entertainment (albeit the modern Hollywood action movie is the equivalent nowadays), the bar was set low on what would be permitted. And that included slave girls, according to the documentary, herded into the arena to be mated by dogs as the crowd cheered and jeered to show the depravity of barbarians. I would love to say the slave girls were granted their freedom and paraded on shoulders through the streets for their magnificent role in zoophilia history. Sadly, no such luck. After being mated, they had their throats cut. To those about to mate, we salute you.
I had never considered that about Diogenes. Hmmm... Worth thinking about. Thanks!I am convinced that Diogenes of Sinope was probably a zoo.
If he was, then you know he would have practiced because he rejected all social conventions, and he was deliberately subversive. You know that, if he thought he could get someone's goat by fucking a dog in public, he probably would do it just on account. In fact, Diogenes was convinced that squeamishness was among the primary defects of the human race and was really an unpardonable fault.
In fact, I would even speculate, adventurously, that his zooishness may have been the inspiration behind his entire philosophy, and his philosophy inspired Zeno of Citium to found the philosophy of Stoicism, which is the very foundation of the modern concept of social justice...or any kind of equality based justice at all, frankly.
LOL this is pure fantasy you've made up in your mind to justify your own fetish you have absolutely zero proof of this.I have strong ideas that powerful men in history have had female spouses that enjoyed animals. Ranging from ancient Egyptian pharaohs to United States presidents and Wall Street Titans.
I think it’s possible men achieve a peaceful sense of mind knowing their wives are sexually satisfied anytime, without other random people involved.
I’m not trying to prove anything to anyoneLOL this is pure fantasy you've made up in your mind to justify your own fetish you have absolutely zero proof of this.