Louis Belmont
Citizen of Zooville
Almost every country in the world participated in World War II. Most women they were alone.
Zoophilia in history
- Thread starter ZTHorse
- Start date
S
Svaðilfari
Guest
I understand why we are all on this forum. But there is no need to mix history into your fantasies. This is disgusting.
Louis Belmont
Citizen of Zooville
This happened, I know reports but I won't argue with you.
VolkaSoyuza
Citizen of Zooville
Its a tragedy how much pre-colonial folklore and information was lost. could have entirely been avoided
S
Svaðilfari
Guest
OK then. I'm one of those people who admit mistakes. Please write the source of your reports
S
Svaðilfari
Guest
NO
Нет нельзя ?
saddlebum66
Supreme Citizen of ZV
Not really....No NA Tribe North of Mexico had a known writing system sophisticated enough to communicate details. South of The Rio, details were often limited to tales of the Gods, and not daily lore and life.
If you can't record it, it is doomed to disappear. Regrettable but true.
saddlebum66
Supreme Citizen of ZV
Id question every bit of that statement. It's a virtual lock that it's either fantasy or lies. As proof, I submit....Women were a significant part of the workforce, often putting in very long days. Food was rationed tightly. Shelter was shared in most cases.
Privacy would thus have been very limited. Feeding a larger pet, expensive, and Time didnt allow for a lot of what is implied. Masturbation is cheap, satisfying, and private. You're saying the World went backwards post War? Don't think so, friend. I've been around for most of the time since.
D-Day was 80 years ago...that isn't long enough to reverse a course of human behavior. Especially a behavior thats been documented for many centuries.
WW I claims used to be specific to "Parisian Women", mostly Catholic, by the way...I suspect that was originated on the German side of the Trenches...and that the French Soldiers told similar stories about the German women of Berlin...Its a fantasy.
VolkaSoyuza
Citizen of Zooville
I was more meaning as in, if the native american genocide didn't happen we would probably have a better oral record of folklore, many entire cultures were lost through the many tradgedies, its a similar story in australia but thankfully the british arrived late enough that they began to realize it was evil to do that.
saddlebum66
Supreme Citizen of ZV
The NA "Manifest Destiny" was not in most places a Genocide. That term indicates a conspiracy that never existed in The US on any policy basis. It was flat-out theft and Murder, but not really a genocide. I know that sounds like prevarication, but History is history.
That said, you probably ought to look deeper into NA tribal lore. Its out there and mostly easily found IF you know what youre looking for, and At.
Because no given nation shared a United culture with other nations, there is no Central location. Each band, each nation, each "Tribe" had its own lore, culture, foods, and the like, and in most of them that survive, it is written history. Even those nations whose languages are dead have been studied by The Bureau Of Ethnology here. The Internet Archive has a lot of their publications. I have one book Ive had for over Fifty years, written by Julian Salomon. Pretty good on lore. Not on sex...remember that morality and modesty were hallmarks of many ancient cultures, and Native Americans were no exception. Sex wouldn't be openly discussed.
Demigod
Citizen of Zooville
Can you share these reports? I'm skeptical of this claim since women were held to a higher standard back in the day. I'm not saying that bestiality didn't happen during thoee times but nonetheless I want to read those reports for myself.
saddlebum66
Supreme Citizen of ZV
Louis, my lad...if you have evidence that is NOT anecdotal, bring it or cite it...because I was RAISED by a Royal Navy Gal, and a US Army Fella, grew up in a house FULL of both male and female veterans of that War, was Grandparented by people who served in the GREAT WAR...I have known MANY...and I'm not buying it. You're pushing another instance of anonymity breeding contempt, As In " I'm like this, so everyone ELSE is like this...". THIS I know...it didn't happen outside of statistical norms. There may well have been occasional interspecies encounters, but I submit that would have been far more likely among the Muleskinners and Horsecopers on all sides, than the women... Neither war was LONG ENOUGH to alter morality.No WAR really ever has been. EAT a dog,maybe...sieges cause stranger things, and food was a problem in many places...but Boinking an animal? Don't think so. Most of them wouldnt have known it was possible...no internet
Louis Belmont
Citizen of Zooville
I'm not saying it was something on a large scale, it's just reports I heard in my country. I'm not saying it was global.
Louis Belmont
Citizen of Zooville
Don't know if this was posted here already but there is a Buddhist story about a queen who had sex with a dog... Queen Mallikā.
The story goes that one day Queen Mallikā entered the bathhouse, and having bathed her face, bent over and began to bathe her leg. Now her pet dog entered the bath-house with her, and when he saw her standing there with body thus bent over, he began to misbehave with her and she let him continue. The king looked out of a window on the upper floor of the palace and saw her. On her return he said to her, “Perish, vile woman; why did you do such a thing as that?” “Why, your majesty, what have I done?” “You have behaved most wrongly with a dog.” “It is not true, your majesty.” “I saw you with my own eyes. I will not believe anything you say. Perish, vile woman.” “Great king, it is a remarkable fact that whoever enters that bath-house appears double to whoever looks out of that window.” “You utter falsehood.” “If you will not believe me, enter the bath-house yourself, and I will look out of that window.
The king was such a simpleton as to believe what she said, and entered the bath-house. The queen stood at the window and looked out. Suddenly she cried out to him, “You foolish king, what do you mean by misbehaving with a she-goat?” “Dear wife, I am doing no such thing.” The queen replied, “I saw you with my own eyes; I will not believe you.” When the king heard her reply, he said, “It must be true that whoever enters this bath-house appears double.” Therefore he believed the explanation she gave him.
Mallikā thought to herself, “I have deceived this king, because he is such a simpleton. I have committed a great sin. Moreover I have accused him falsely. The Teacher will come to know of this sin of mine, and likewise the Two Chief Disciples, and the Eighty Chief Elders. Oh, what a grievous sin have I committed!” (According to tradition it was Mallikā who was associated with the king in the presentation to the Teacher of the Gifts beyond Compare. On this occasion gifts valued at fourteen crores of treasure were bestowed upon the Teacher, and the Tathāgata was presented with four priceless gifts; namely, a white parasol, a couch whereon to rest, a stand, and a stool for the feet.) When Mallikā died, forgetful at the moment of death of those mighty gifts, but with full recollection of the evil deed she had committed, she was reborn in the Hell.
The story goes that one day Queen Mallikā entered the bathhouse, and having bathed her face, bent over and began to bathe her leg. Now her pet dog entered the bath-house with her, and when he saw her standing there with body thus bent over, he began to misbehave with her and she let him continue. The king looked out of a window on the upper floor of the palace and saw her. On her return he said to her, “Perish, vile woman; why did you do such a thing as that?” “Why, your majesty, what have I done?” “You have behaved most wrongly with a dog.” “It is not true, your majesty.” “I saw you with my own eyes. I will not believe anything you say. Perish, vile woman.” “Great king, it is a remarkable fact that whoever enters that bath-house appears double to whoever looks out of that window.” “You utter falsehood.” “If you will not believe me, enter the bath-house yourself, and I will look out of that window.
The king was such a simpleton as to believe what she said, and entered the bath-house. The queen stood at the window and looked out. Suddenly she cried out to him, “You foolish king, what do you mean by misbehaving with a she-goat?” “Dear wife, I am doing no such thing.” The queen replied, “I saw you with my own eyes; I will not believe you.” When the king heard her reply, he said, “It must be true that whoever enters this bath-house appears double.” Therefore he believed the explanation she gave him.
Mallikā thought to herself, “I have deceived this king, because he is such a simpleton. I have committed a great sin. Moreover I have accused him falsely. The Teacher will come to know of this sin of mine, and likewise the Two Chief Disciples, and the Eighty Chief Elders. Oh, what a grievous sin have I committed!” (According to tradition it was Mallikā who was associated with the king in the presentation to the Teacher of the Gifts beyond Compare. On this occasion gifts valued at fourteen crores of treasure were bestowed upon the Teacher, and the Tathāgata was presented with four priceless gifts; namely, a white parasol, a couch whereon to rest, a stand, and a stool for the feet.) When Mallikā died, forgetful at the moment of death of those mighty gifts, but with full recollection of the evil deed she had committed, she was reborn in the Hell.
saddlebum66
Supreme Citizen of ZV
Stories are stories, facts are facts. As long as one is not confused with the other, fiction enriches life.
saddlebum66
Supreme Citizen of ZV
Good...It wasn't and it isn't. What Country keeps such "reports"? The USSR might have.
S
Svaðilfari
Guest
as soon as we talk about the secret and the opposite of the usual civilization (for Americans), then everyone remembers the USSR
Last edited:
Renee
Citizen of Zooville
I sure would like to read over that.
Demigod
Citizen of Zooville
A little bit off topic - nothing has changed for thousands of years. Too many men are still simpletons in 2024 and I don't blame women for avoieing suckers. Whether it's 1,500 A.D. or 2,024 A.D. naïvé men are still commonplace. What a shame.
highwaywolf9
Tourist
This is not the recent history I wanted ?
Soy antropólogo, tengo un artículo sobre el bestialismo en el antiguo Egipto. Próximamente lo voy a publicar en el foro de español. Saludos amigos zoo.
daddydom91
Tourist
Idk if it was said but in the bathhouse of Pompeii they used erotic pictures ( threesomes, different sexual positions and bestiality pics) instead of numbers on your "locker". Wish we did that now. Yup not number 13. My clothes are in the double penetration locker
Demigod
Citizen of Zooville
What do you mean by a number on a locker? I've never been to a bath house and I don't see any local bath houses for straight men in my neck of the woods.
daddydom91
Tourist
Ancient civilizations didn't have baths in their own homes. You went to a specific building where you all bathed together( or separate sometimes). It was a way to socialize, make political alliances, and whatnot. But while you were naked and bathing you'd leave your clothes in a cubby or personal closet. They market those with erotic picture so people remembered where their items were
Demigod
Citizen of Zooville
That's actually quite interesting. Nonetheless I presumed that the erotic art existed for other reasons, notably sex.
daddydom91
Tourist
It's pretty much widely accepted that it was just a funny way to remember your stuff. Or kinda like political cartoons. Just something to laugh and point at. But I always assume there's a deeper meaning. They often used picture that would be "taboo" or frowned on
Onlyforonion12
Lurker
one word…. Greeks
I wish there were more depictions of women with male animals. So much better when the animal is the one in control.