Would you ever watch someone have sex with a dog live over the internet?

[syrjohn]

ABSOLUTELY YES! Where do I sign up!

 

[Razorlys]

In a heartbeat

 

[rydersup]

I actually have myself
The people went nuts loving it I’m told lol

 

[rydersup]

I was the guy getting knotted I mean……while others watched

 

[Sauce_Diamonds]

Hell, I'd watch in person.

 

[Readytogo273]

I'd jump at the possibility

 

[Two Dogs Deep]

I have a couple times, it was hot, but not recently

 

[BZ88]

I've done it before would definitely love to see it again irl

 

[HornyChristian]

I would love to see someone live

 

[Bonniejohnston]

This has been a fantasy of mine for a long time!

maybe

 

[CDN88]

I would love to see someone live

Live is awesome.

 

[hippoboy]

Yes please

 

[Yuri1944]

Nope, that would be a dumb idea in terms of my safety

 

[Swe86]

why yes, yes i would

 

[MrBigby]

Yes dropped lucky a couple of times. Once got realy lucky and got a lad about 20 and his dog who he fucked. Both very hot

 

[bigd3546]

Yes

 

[dewfur]

This has been a fantasy of mine for a long time!

100% lol

 

[Sayu]

Yes, only male dog and girl though.

 

[Knutshack]

Got the opportunity once but I ended up being busy and couldn't do it, then he disappeared

I mean I've been sent videos made from another person, where they had sex recently or last night or the night before, does that count?

 

[DaddyCupcake]

Pass.

 

[CritterFunatic]

No.

Mostly because I'm really not into dogs. Lovely animals, just not sexy for me.

But also maybe more importantly, because a livestream sounds like commercial exploitation to me, which is something an animal really shouldn't be involved in at all. I'm pretty old-school when it comes to that, Z.E.T.A. principles old-school.

A difference would be, if it was not a commercial but rather a private stream, only intended for a selected few people and only, when sex was happening anyway, camera or not.

But then again, not into dogs and also not really into zoo-porn, so I'd pass. I'd probably also pass on species I'd be into as well, because the sex should really be something intimate between the animal and person doing it, not something to be broadcast to entertain others and something to brag about.

So I'd most certainly pass.

 

[Beastmode2021]

I have in the past and would love to see it again. Unfortunately, I haven't had the chance these couple of years.

 

[TorrentialDownPour]

I have, but it was very clinical and not very sexy. It was absolutely no fault of the person who was sharing that moment with me... but it's not like I was there with him. Made it not feel like anything, idk.

 

[TorrentialDownPour]

No.

Mostly because I'm really not into dogs. Lovely animals, just not sexy for me.

But also maybe more importantly, because a livestream sounds like commercial exploitation to me, which is something an animal really shouldn't be involved in at all. I'm pretty old-school when it comes to that, Z.E.T.A. principles old-school.

A difference would be, if it was not a commercial but rather a private stream, only intended for a selected few people and only, when sex was happening anyway, camera or not.

But then again, not into dogs and also not really into zoo-porn, so I'd pass. I'd probably also pass on species I'd be into as well, because the sex should really be something intimate between the animal and person doing it, not something to be broadcast to entertain others and something to brag about.

So I'd most certainly pass.

That's what the one I got to witness was, a private showing from a closer acquaintance rather than someone I don't know at all. Unfortunately, as I said in my own post... it wasn't really... anything. It's hard to get into and I guess we both agree in ways.

 

[Oxide219]

I would absolutely love to see it!

 

[CritterFunatic]

That's what the one I got to witness was, a private showing from a closer acquaintance rather than someone I don't know at all. Unfortunately, as I said in my own post... it wasn't really... anything. It's hard to get into and I guess we both agree in ways.

That at least gives it an air of familiarity. If it's a private session it can feel much more intimate and authentic than anything made for the public, I guess.

 

[FoxFan2006]

How is this even a question lol

 

[unknownfornicator]

I absolutely would in a heartbeat! I think it is the perfect blend of voyeurism and zoo!

I am very open and have a large availability.

only looking for F/M by the way

 

[TorrentialDownPour]

That at least gives it an air of familiarity. If it's a private session it can feel much more intimate and authentic than anything made for the public, I guess.

Yeah, it wasn't as bad. It was because I wasn't partaking, if anything else
It was difficult to feel anything when you aren't even present, also he wasn't great at getting imagery to make that point worth anything. So it didn't feel like anything at all, it was just a bizarre conversation.

 

[CritterFunatic]

Yeah, it wasn't as bad. It was because I wasn't partaking, if anything else
It was difficult to feel anything when you aren't even present, also he wasn't great at getting imagery to make that point worth anything. So it didn't feel like anything at all, it was just a bizarre conversation.

Reminds me of a guy into e-stim deviced in the early 2000nds who loved video calls on MSN and the likes (before Skype was around) and rigged his devices in a way to get triggered by certain trigger words in chat, basically giving the control over to the watcher, so they may edge him and so forth. Was certainly a fun concept, but the video quality around that time was truely "potato".