YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
A TL;DR variant of my longer posting would be:
If you had human children (or dog puppies.. or any other sort of offspring) which grew up their whole life in a purely different breed / species animal "family", "pack", "team" - whatever.. and this would work out without any health-related problems (like "Tarzan" to a level of comparison), you could be almost 100% sure that no matter which personal interests the animal / human has, they would search for the fulfillment of those after being an adult aka sexually developed in the area they grew up with, as such.. with animals. Of the species they grew up with, mostly. Be it bi, homo- or heterosexual, doesn't matter.
That's not yet studied with humans, as there are only a few individuals which actually grew up far from human villages and mostly cared for by animals (but they exist, to a degree.. not 100% purely cared for by animals, but mostly).
But it is studied with animals. More or less involuntarily by having packs, teams, "families", partners of different(!) animals growing up together and at some sort in the future - if they were not included in their own species / breed social structures - tried to copulate with the animals they grew up with. And that's fully normal. Experiences are more important in decision-based events, even if triggered by hormones, than DNA predetermination.
The short version ends here. For further information continue below:
Else humans, which are quite clearly described as being an anthropologic bipedals wouldn't walk on all four limbs and resemble quite clearly the behavior (even if unhealthy for their limbs / joints due to longer legs compared to upper arms) of those animals they grew up with as part of the own "family".
Sexual aspects are not farther separated from DNA than humans specific traits like bipedalism. As such if one aspect (and there are dozens, actually, which are reported to have been altered by such uprising) reflected mostly based on experiences, not genetics, then it's understandable that sexual interests are based on such as well - and not a hard-linked feat by DNA.
Here are some informations about "feral childs":
If you had human children (or dog puppies.. or any other sort of offspring) which grew up their whole life in a purely different breed / species animal "family", "pack", "team" - whatever.. and this would work out without any health-related problems (like "Tarzan" to a level of comparison), you could be almost 100% sure that no matter which personal interests the animal / human has, they would search for the fulfillment of those after being an adult aka sexually developed in the area they grew up with, as such.. with animals. Of the species they grew up with, mostly. Be it bi, homo- or heterosexual, doesn't matter.
That's not yet studied with humans, as there are only a few individuals which actually grew up far from human villages and mostly cared for by animals (but they exist, to a degree.. not 100% purely cared for by animals, but mostly).
But it is studied with animals. More or less involuntarily by having packs, teams, "families", partners of different(!) animals growing up together and at some sort in the future - if they were not included in their own species / breed social structures - tried to copulate with the animals they grew up with. And that's fully normal. Experiences are more important in decision-based events, even if triggered by hormones, than DNA predetermination.
The short version ends here. For further information continue below:
Else humans, which are quite clearly described as being an anthropologic bipedals wouldn't walk on all four limbs and resemble quite clearly the behavior (even if unhealthy for their limbs / joints due to longer legs compared to upper arms) of those animals they grew up with as part of the own "family".
Sexual aspects are not farther separated from DNA than humans specific traits like bipedalism. As such if one aspect (and there are dozens, actually, which are reported to have been altered by such uprising) reflected mostly based on experiences, not genetics, then it's understandable that sexual interests are based on such as well - and not a hard-linked feat by DNA.
Here are some informations about "feral childs":
11 Feral Childs Who Were Raised By Animals
A feral child is often defined as an abandoned or confined human child taken away from any type of human interaction or communication because of some sort
detechter.com
Feral child - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Last edited: