What dog has the highest sex drive

guess it could be tied to the energy levels of various breeds (ie: a border collie would likely have more sexdrive than a mastiff), but i doubt it's that straight forward and not individual. my current boy (a caucassian shepherd) asks for release once or twice a day and he isn't that energetic overall. he will literally spend most of the afternoon laying on the sofa, get up to pester me for sex and then go lay down again when he gets it.
 
I know one husky how is horny as hell... 🤪but I'm more interested playing with his friend, who is a giant alabai, he also seems to want a lot, but he is too nervous and unstable (could be because of young age), and he is way too strong to keep him in place... I've no idea how to tame this monster 😬
 
My first lab was a lazy sod, unless food or sex was involved. My first Dalmatian was a virtual rapist just wanted to fuck me and any other willing or otherwise lady or unwilling husband unwittingly in the correct position looking for the remote control. My current lad takes it when offered and enjoys the experience but if my knickers stay on her rarely demands sex more than once a week.
 
I know my Australian Cattle Dog had a very high sex drive. He was the one that took my vaginal virginity and knotted me the first time I let him mount me.
 
why cannot people understand there is no one breed with higher sex drive, bigger penis more cum etc.. As in people it is an individual thing .
 
underdoge said:
I think most people are strongly biased towards simple answers. So there's a lot of people who say there is no best breed and a lot of people who believe there is a best breed. I believe the answer almost always exists in the middle. The template is usually: yes, but no and here's why.
Click to expand...
I'd say it definitely also tends to come from the 'fetish only' kind of members, who should probably be investing in toys instead of animals.
 
underdoge said:
Is it not possible to love your dogs honestly but also fantasize a bit? Is everyone who watches porn also in the same category (almost everyone here)? How did you get to know enough people deep in their hearts who independently ask this exact question? I only know a few people well enough to say with certainty what kind of love they have for their animals and what makes it tick.

What about if a normal loving dog owner also has a fetish, and wants to satisfy it while also being good to their dog but doesn't want an animal SO? Is that bad? In my books, anyone who loves their animal whether it's normal love or zoo love is good. Normies can love their dogs, zoos can love their dogs, so why not fetishists?

There's a lot to think about. I don't believe there is an elite class of zoos and the rest are scum. The full picture is much more interesting.
Click to expand...
This isn't about egos and elites, this is about the mental, emotional and physical well-being of the nonhuman partners in question. And it becomes questionable when it's nothing more than a fetish because in order for it to actually be a fetish there needs to be a genuine and significant level of specism (superiority complex toward nonhuman species) and therefore a lack of equality and WORTH in the power balance of sexual interactions which often lead to unintentional abuse behavior such as giving "commands" or physically restraining or forcing (often padded with more friendly-sounding terms like "helping"), especially in the heat of the moment when you're near orgasm and they aren't "cooperating". Really ask yourself, who's more important in bed? If it's you, chances are you've been abusing and you dont even recognize it as such.

On the other paw, if those specist, typical pet "owner" views and fetishist/bestialist behavior doesnt apply to you, you're probably just a fully fledged zoo who's got some inner conflict due to negative social conditoning about nonhuman beings.

But that's just my view on the subject.
 
underdoge said:
I think that was a good response. Do these few words "Is there a difference in dog sex drive?" from the original poster tell others here everything they need to know to start talking as if he is an abuser, considering the cost that it is a hurtful thing to say?

People with zero sexuality towards animals can be as amazing to them as the best zoo. Heroic animal rescue stories are common to hear about and there is an army of good people behind them. So if you take one of those caring people and sprinkle some sexuality towards animals into the mix, how would they behave? Lets say they do not see animals as suitable life partners like most people, but gradually discovers that they get the hots for their anatomy. Their existing not-zoo-related caring for animals would cause them to treat the animal well regardless right? They would technically be a fetishist or beastialist because aside from their sexual attraction, everything else is in the realm of non-zoo. There is no romantic attraction. Still this person would put zoos to shame on animal ethics and selflessness.

Romantic love, sexual attraction, and care/respect for animals are independent factors. When I see someone asking questions that objectify animals I wonder is that actually proof that this person would mistreat an animal? The answer is normally no. This person might have very firm ethics that they apply to animals *in their care* but can objectify and fantasize about ideas that are animal related (aka not real animals).
Click to expand...
I was only referring to those who view and treat this as a fetish and is thus what has been termed in the zoo community a "user" or "bestialist". One can care well for a nonhuman being while still having specist views that can affect things significantly once sex is introduced because then they are often treated by these types of people basically like a sex toy that needs to "perform", again, especially when the human is near orgasm.

BUT the caveat I added at the end does apply. What it all comes down to is how they are viewed and treated during sexy time. If it's all the nonhuman partner's choice in how things go down or if anything happens at all (and not waiting for growls or bared teeth to stop, which wont happen most of the time anyway due to their heirarchial status in your pack), then we're talking about a zoo, not a fetishist. I'm just saying that the fetishist/bestialist attitude tends to not always be 100% conducive to consensual (not just them tolerating an act) and MUTUALLY pleasurable sexual experiences every time.
 
underdoge said:
Is it not possible to love your dogs honestly but also fantasize a bit? Is everyone who watches porn also in the same category (almost everyone here)? How did you get to know enough people deep in their hearts who independently ask this exact question? I only know a few people well enough to say with certainty what kind of love they have for their animals and what makes it tick.

What about if a normal loving dog owner also has a fetish, and wants to satisfy it while also being good to their dog but doesn't want an animal SO? Is that bad? In my books, anyone who loves their animal whether it's normal love or zoo love is good. Normies can love their dogs, zoos can love their dogs, so why not fetishists?

There's a lot to think about. I don't believe there is an elite class of zoos and the rest are scum. The full picture is much more interesting.
Click to expand...
This! 100%. Thank you for saying it. As a noob myself, I still see a lot of comments on here from some of the more experienced users that just seem judgmental and elitist. It's a bit disheartening since a lot of us come here precisely to avoid the judgment.

Now... there is something to be said about tact and conduct in a forum post (and hopefully most of us have read the ZOOVILLE RULES to know what to avoid), but let's be honest. We all get horny, and sometimes we might post something that's purely driven by that. Why would that one-liner post or comment define our entire personality? It shouldn't.

We are all newbies, until we're not.
 
underdoge said:
I'd say Rottweilers and pitbulls are at the top. Rottweilers are famous for being dominant lovers. Next there are working breeds which are all amazing: great danes (might also be teir 1, I'm on the fence about that), german shepherds, dobermans, etc. Next will be your companion breeds: lab, golden, etc. Finally your living furniture, dogs that commonly have thyroid issues or dogs that get hot fast like old english mastiff, newfie, malamute and saint bernard. Also at the same level are dogs that are very independent and don't care as much for human interaction like akita and cauciasian shepherd.

Everyone is right that it is primarily based on the individual dog so what I said above are just vague patterns that I've noticed, heard of and reasoned about. If you get a pitbull or rottweiler you have a better chance at having an active lover, but you might also get a dog with no interest too. It is related to energy levels, desire for human attachment, lack of training / impulsiveness, athleticism, heat tolerance, and not having a hormone problem.

You should pick a dog based on how they match your lifestyle and which dog you'd like the best to have in your home because long-term that is what will matter to you the most. I've had great luck forming sexual relationships with almost all dogs so you have good chances no matter which dog you pick. I have noticed the uncontrolled crazy ones will realize the sexual connection the quickest but these dogs are the hardest to live with and take the most work to integrate into your life.
Click to expand...
Pitbulls got some nice fat fucking knots. I've been tied by them a good number of times.

Boxers are p chill most times. The ones I've been fucked by usually relax whole they cum in you. I lot like to lick the back of my head. Better than them ripping the swollen knot out. It hurts like hell but I kinda like it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top