That's most certainly what they are trying to do. I may be a young whipper-snapper in his mid-20s, but in my 7 year involvement in the zoophile community, I've already ran across several of these sick puppies so far. It's unfortunate, but these people do exist within our the zoo community, if one were to call it a community. I've permanently severed ties with a couple of puppy molesters, animal abusers, and one zoosadist. I do not stand for such crap! But these people are hidden among us, and they do unfortunately exist. Seeing that you are an old timer zoo, I'm sure you're more than well aware of that. I can only imagine how many of those types you've ran into so far?I'm not entirely certain what they intend to get from the type of questions asked.
To me the inclusion of small and very young animals was a tad disturbing. It's almost as if probing to see how many "animal pedos" or sadists we have among us.
Just my .02
While i agree with your reasons as to why, i have to be suspicious of the overall benefit to us as a whole.That's most certainly what they are trying to do. I may be a young whipper-snapper in his mid-20s, but in my 7 year involvement in the zoophile community, I've already ran across several of these sick puppies so far. It's unfortunate, but these people do exist within our the zoo community, if one were to call it a community. I've permanently severed ties with a couple of puppy molesters, animal abusers, and one zoosadist. I do not stand for such crap! But these people are hidden among us, and they do unfortunately exist. Seeing that you are an old timer zoo, I'm sure you're more than well aware of that. I can only imagine how many of those types you've ran into so far?
It might be useful to know just how many, and what percentage of total zoos make up these vile scum-of-the-earth types. (Hopefully, they don't inflate the numbers to make us all look bad.) The amount of "OMG That's HAWT!" comments on abusive porn that's been uploaded to every singe forum that I've been apart of, is frankly disconcerting. But you can most likely chalk them up to being fetishists only interested in the taboo nature of zoophilic sex. They care very little about the well being of the animal in said abusive video.
I for one, welcome these type of questions on the survey. Hopefully, we can get a clearer picture of just how many malevolent zoos exist among us benevolent zoos. That's of course if everyone is to answer honestly.
Nope. A study on zoophilia won't give any results about the prevalence of zoos among furries other than that it's not zero. This study can only determine the prevalence of furries among zoos.Also fun how they included questions related to furries and pet play folks, i assume its gonna be a lot harder for normie furs to deny that most like zoo after that study comes out, then again that won’t exactly shine a good light on the community since zoo stuff is frowned upon but we already get called zoos so why not.
I will definitely partake in this soonHello Everyone,
The University of Saskatchewan has reached out to Zooville.org for support for their study on zoophilia. They have met our screening and obligations to the zoo community and have given us their letter of Intent as well as their study link. The study is being completed by Alexandra Zidenberg and overseen by Prof. Dr. Mark Olver.
This research is being done in two groups, one for general release and one control group that partook in the previous northwestern university. The public link is posted below and the private group will be PMed a seperate link for the control group. Please fulfill this survey to continue research for our sexual orientation.
Free Online Survey Software by SurveyMonkey: Closed Survey
This survey is currently closed. Please contact the author of this survey for further assistance.www.surveymonkey.ca
Best Regards,
ZT
View attachment 111182