UR20Z
Dumpster Diver
Hostile??? OK, now I think I see what the problem is - you're convinced you're right, even in the face of evidence that demonstrates that you're completely wrong, and you're too attached to the fantasy to actually look at the pictures you yoursef posted, rather than relying on that fantasy. To get anything like what you seem to think happens, the point of contact between the two openings MUST be pretty close to parallel/co-axial to each other. As can be seen by looking at the "data" you're bringing, the reality is that the openings in question lie at something very close to a 90 degree angle to each other. Which is just about as far from the alignment that's required as it's possible to get.
And I'm simply saying actually LOOK AT this "data" you yourself are bringing to the table - It clearly says that the reality is very nearly EXACTLY the opposite of what your fantasies would require the situation to be.
Yep, you are indeed "bringing the research". Unfortunately, that "research" you're bringing disagrees with what you think the situation is. No, I retract that - "disagrees" is the wrong way to say it - It proves conclusively that your fantasy is just that: A fantasy with no connection to reality.
Ultimately, though, we already have the answer. You posted it yourself - remember those MRI pics we're talking about? Look at the angle between uterus/cervix and vagina/penis, then try to tell me that your position is even a little bit supportable. Then consider that in the majority of cases (meaning "doggy style", rather than missionary, as your "evidence" shows") and the associated fact that the urethral process of a dog would be rotated 180 degrees from the urethral meatus of a man, it becomes even LESS likely that the required alignment could be achieved.
Step back, look at the photo that you yourself chose to back your stance, and use the head on your shoulders, rather than the one in your pants to decide just how realistic your idea is(n't). Look at the FACTS, not your dearly held fantasy.
