So... ZooVille's back!

Ok NOW I’m real interested. Since word had traveled past social media and internet news. DM me the county for my own confirmation.
Info like the county is all public knowledge via the ongoing court case involving the person that was arrested in MO.

Go to Courts.mo.gov and search for case numbers 26WR-CR00361 and 26WR-CR00361-01
 
And it is not a group, it is a channel where you can not post.
@FloofyNewfie Is it or can we put this somewhere visible so people know it exists? Even though it is mostly useless not very much maintained and silent for the majority of the year.
Provided this is the official channel.
 
Last edited:
Funny....that basic story sounds a LOT like what happened in the bad old days at Elite....before Fausty fucked that up for good. Someone went to jail,lost his dogs, got out, threatened the guy who started the argument....and these knucks were roomies. The more things change.....
 
Well, as much as I have my reservations and issues with this site, I am glad it's back. It allows me to reconnect with some folks that I hung out with elsewhere that got zapped along with this place.
 
So there are two users (with new accounts, interesting...) who claim that a recent zoosadist case involves dogluver and that's why the sites were shut down.

Is there any evidence for this besides a few similarities?

If it really happened, then the zoophile community is facing a huge problem, because then the credibility of ZV and many wellknown big names will be leveled with the ground. The entire ZV was built to support ethical zoophilia (and porn).
If such a case really happened, then the credibility of all users will be zero. It wasn't advisable to blindly trust anyone anyway, but now you won't be able to trust anyone anymore, not even the staff. So the future of ZCA will also be a big problem, because who would want to use a forum with such a past, who can be trusted? This will cause huge damage.
Moreover, ZV can expect even more antizoo attacks in the future, because "ZV is just a sadistic site."

If it really happened.
I hope it's just a mistake.
 
So there are two users (with new accounts, interesting...) who claim that a recent zoosadist case involves dogluver and that's why the sites were shut down.

Is there any evidence for this besides a few similarities?

If it really happened, then the zoophile community is facing a huge problem, because then the credibility of ZV and many wellknown big names will be leveled with the ground. The entire ZV was built to support ethical zoophilia (and porn).
If such a case really happened, then the credibility of all users will be zero. It wasn't advisable to blindly trust anyone anyway, but now you won't be able to trust anyone anymore, not even the staff. So the future of ZCA will also be a big problem, because who would want to use a forum with such a past, who can be trusted? This will cause huge damage.
Moreover, ZV can expect even more antizoo attacks in the future, because "ZV is just a sadistic site."

If it really happened.
I hope it's just a mistake.
Any evidence I’ve had has been shared with FloofyNewfie and won’t be shared publicly on the forum, with the exception of the Missouri court case which is already public record but I can’t say what that persons ZV username is because that would be “doxing”. Nothing will be public on here unless he chooses to share what he finds. The other guy claims to have more definitive proof than I had so we’ll see what comes of it.
 
So there are two users (with new accounts, interesting...) who claim that a recent zoosadist case involves dogluver and that's why the sites were shut down.

Is there any evidence for this besides a few similarities?

If it really happened, then the zoophile community is facing a huge problem, because then the credibility of ZV and many wellknown big names will be leveled with the ground. The entire ZV was built to support ethical zoophilia (and porn).
If such a case really happened, then the credibility of all users will be zero. It wasn't advisable to blindly trust anyone anyway, but now you won't be able to trust anyone anymore, not even the staff. So the future of ZCA will also be a big problem, because who would want to use a forum with such a past, who can be trusted? This will cause huge damage.
Moreover, ZV can expect even more antizoo attacks in the future, because "ZV is just a sadistic site."

If it really happened.
I hope it's just a mistake.
Floofy is looking into it.
It wasn't advisable to blindly trust anyone anyway
There is not really any way to completely know someone you only talk to online or even in person. That is just the reality of the ability to lie. We trust people based on their actions that we can know about. You do that as well and you can not say you know everything about every contact you have either.
Mistakes happen.

That said I hope this will be cleared and dogluver will be innocent. Otherwise this whole situation really disappoints me.
 
So there are two users (with new accounts, interesting...) who claim that a recent zoosadist case involves dogluver and that's why the sites were shut down.

Is there any evidence for this besides a few similarities?

If it really happened, then the zoophile community is facing a huge problem, because then the credibility of ZV and many wellknown big names will be leveled with the ground. The entire ZV was built to support ethical zoophilia (and porn).
If such a case really happened, then the credibility of all users will be zero. It wasn't advisable to blindly trust anyone anyway, but now you won't be able to trust anyone anymore, not even the staff. So the future of ZCA will also be a big problem, because who would want to use a forum with such a past, who can be trusted? This will cause huge damage.
Moreover, ZV can expect even more antizoo attacks in the future, because "ZV is just a sadistic site."

If it really happened.
I hope it's just a mistake.
Just because there was one asshole doesn’t mean the whole thing is rotten. Dont let the jerks ruin the whole thing for everyone. People will say what they will say.
 
Someone better get to the bottom of it pretty fucking quick. Really hard to not go angermatic nuke post in here. It’s also really good this thread is visible from the main page without logging in.
 
Should've just nuked his account to be done with him. To set an example. because he trots around like he's some kind of savior.
That would require removing the keys entirely. Of which has to be done by the top. Will they do such? I have no idea nor do I know any potential involvement of what’s going on. Pointing fingers and branding him of such would be wrong without any direct evidence. Vetting the top is an incredibly difficult task giving the nature of what we are involved in.
 
Back
Top