That is by definition not tape. They also stupidly misspelled it as "duct". Despite what naysayers would have you believe, DUCK is the correct name. It was developed by the navy to work amphibiously in both wet and dry conditions and was therefore named duck. The "duct" came later after construction started using it in place of proper metallic tape when seal ductwork.
Nowadays "Duck Tape" is a trademarked brand, so all the other companies making it have to call it "duct tape"That is by definition not tape. They also stupidly misspelled it as "duct". Despite what naysayers would have you believe, DUCK is the correct name. It was developed by the navy to work amphibiously in both wet and dry conditions and was therefore named duck. The "duct" came later after construction started using it in place of proper metallic tape when seal ductwork.
well, "duct" seems to be correct then, since the spray is meant to seal metallic, rubber and plastic surfaces from the outside.That is by definition not tape. They also stupidly misspelled it as "duct". Despite what naysayers would have you believe, DUCK is the correct name. It was developed by the navy to work amphibiously in both wet and dry conditions and was therefore named duck. The "duct" came later after construction started using it in place of proper metallic tape when seal ductwork.
"Duck" is a trademarked brand name....every other mfr calls it Duct Tape to avoid copyright and patent infringement.That is by definition not tape. They also stupidly misspelled it as "duct". Despite what naysayers would have you believe, DUCK is the correct name. It was developed by the navy to work amphibiously in both wet and dry conditions and was therefore named duck. The "duct" came later after construction started using it in place of proper metallic tape when seal ductwork.
because I do not want itBecause you can't or you don't want it ?
I never just let it sink in ?