That sex between male animals and human females is ancient and sacred. Cave paintings of men fucking animals is just that.
How is it an exclusively sacred act to both women and dogs? If we're going with the definition "connected with God (or the gods) or dedicated to a religious purpose and so deserving veneration." Looking back in history the ancient people of china have records of bestiality between men and animals and also women and animal. So did the ancient Greeks, so did the Egyptians. Egypt is actually a rather fun one, as bestiality between women and dogs were actually used as a treatment for nymphomaniacs, which was seen as a negative trait in their culture.
It was stated right after you condemned me for telling the mare guy how stupid he is for giving animal abuse as a form of advice. Do I have to tell you again that I've fostered sexually abused dogs or should I not even bother since I'm constantly slandered and misquoted by the likes of you and the other excuses for keeping animal sex illegal. The "constantly" part comes from you constantly doing the things I accuse you of doing every time you reply to me. Such as....right now!
I don't know the validity of it's safety. I can't *imagine* that it would cause any harm, although I can't say for certain that there would or would not be any ramifications. I can however *imagine* that it could be pleasurable. Especially if you do so lightly and with a soft textured rag. But it's something I don't plan on doing because I have no reason to do so. My knee jerk reaction was to defend him but later thought about douching canines and thought about how a cloth rag with warm water on it might not be ideal for the canine's pH balance. But then again, you are not shooting water up the vaginal tract.
Hey, if you've actually fostered sexually abused animals and were able to rehabilitate them, good on you. That's a noble act. (If you not lying or internet for brownie points of course.) I've only taken care of neglected and abused dogs from POS owners that really didn't know what their doing. My mutt mix being one of those highly neglected dogs. But to my knowledge both canines I interacted with were not sexually abused. I'm going to ignore the next bit of your statement...
This says it all lol. I at least act sexually with respect to animal kingdom, you promote doing things that aren't observed in animal kingdom such as anal penetration and using anal plugs vaginally because you thought it was impressive when your bro did it.
I can easily say that you care more about your own gratification than you do about animal safety. How?
Indeed,
a good amount of dogs will not accept anal penetration without acclimation.
A good amount of dogs will only tolerate the act or reject the advances all together.
Some dogs will actually like anal stimulation.
Some dogs like penetration because it is still sexually stimulating.
Some dogs have even been observed to have an orgasm from anal sex.
But to say the no dogs enjoy anal is completely false. It's a case by case basis. Observation of body language in some situations proves you wrong.
Again, since your reading comprehension is that of a 5th grader, when it comes to butt plugs for stretching. You should
*****FIRST, make sure they are feeling pleasure through body language indicating that the enjoy it.***** Got that? Good! Next... if they are enjoying it, you'll start with the smallest in a set and slowly work your way up. This will not hurt the canine. If you observe their body language, they should only be receiving pleasure from it. Got that? Good! While observing body language, now that they are stretched you should be able to have MUTUALLY ENJOYABLE sex without causing her any pain from the act of sticking you penis into her vagina.
I was pretty clear about why I wouldn't answer that for everyone to see. You even quoted it:
Ah, so you claim to only hide your supposed knowledge of how how to observe positive sexual body language for "Responsible men." Why would you want to hide the actions of a female canine that indicate they are receiving mutually enjoyable sex? I guess it's better in your opinion to let men *Unknowingly* have non-consensual sex because they don't know what body language signals they ought to be looking out for. (Before you incorrectly quote me on this, yes, this is a hypothetical scenario I'm devising.)
And like clockwork you also misquoted me because you leave out the part in bold that basically says I do a better job of protecting animals from highly potential sexual abuse than you do. It also says that I do give advice to guys with female dogs but it's done on a case-by-case basis only! Why? Because I practice what I preach and care more about animals than I do your stupid zoo community.
I hope you're really proud of yourself for publicly giving advice to future animal rapists. I'm sure you are too since your community obviously accepts them.
I don't care about your section in bold. This information is already publicly available in the how-to section. I'm simply shortening it for OP in a clearer and more concise way. (Also yes, I will be leaving out some irrelevant BS in your quote.) I actually held off giving OP advice until I saw more posts from him, including his porno video. As far as I can tell Zeekwitt cares about his dog, and wouldn't ever knowingly hurt her.
Also yes, I know what positive body language you should be looking out for when sexually engaging with a female canine, want me to point them out?
There really is no "zoo-community," we are a mixed bag of people from all walks of life which all happen to be congregated into one public forum. People who are interested in a similar topic as one another. But the "Zoo-Community ™" that is often touted is really a misnomer to what this place actually is.