Lets expand this to the "moldy ham" vag pics as well. Lets see how welcome the idea becomes once you prevent women from doing the same.
You know, for equality.
Please don't post a picture of yourself as an avatar.
- Thread starter FloofyNewfie
- Start date
You know, for equality.
dartel
Prized Citizen of ZV
I don't see a problem with that. Hell, forbid all nude avatars, animal included. Or at least give us an AI powered nudity filter on avatars.Lets expand this to the "moldy ham" vag pics as well. Lets see how welcome the idea becomes once you prevent women from doing the same.
Even Adultfriendfinder and it's ilk offers an option to blur nude profile photos. It's rather sad that a site designed for pigs to score with anything that moves recognizes that people don't want to be subjected to that, but a "community" such as this lets it fly.
D
Deleted member 76481
Guest
Yeah, equal treatment. If I would like to stare at some dicks and vulvas, I wouldn't be on this site
Lets expand this to the "moldy ham" vag pics as well. Lets see how welcome the idea becomes once you prevent women from doing the same.
While I find humans dicks (and to a lesser extent vag pics) mostly gross, but equally distasteful, I really don't have an issue with animal genitalia pics. At least those fit in slightly more on a site geared towards zoophiles.
As it stands now, these pictures are not against the rules. But I do know that dumpster fire thread about this subject gained a lot of traction, and a lot of it was seemingly in favor of banning these types of profile pictures.
What one of you all could do is create a poll to see how the ZV community feels about dick and vag pictures as a profile picture. A "should they be allowed" with a "Yes" or "No" or maybe even "Yes, as long as they also feature an animal as well." A.K.A., porn profile pictures thread. That should show how everyone feels about them in general with numbers to back up those figures.
That said, this isn't necessary the best place for this discussion, since this thread is about protecting yourself, and protecting others from themselves within the zoo realm.
Considering the composition of the user base, you can predict the result with almost perfect accuracy.
I am making fun of this since I see no way of this policy getting implemented due to how low priority it is and due to how other changes have gone in the past. Even those with positive polls and higher importance. Cough cough puke emoticon and fake cum ban. 
UR20Z
Dumpster Diver
The way you say that, I'd *ALMOST* think that you're OK with twat shotsLets expand this to the "moldy ham" vag pics as well. Lets see how welcome the idea becomes once you prevent women from doing the same.
Personally, I can get behind the whole "No dick pics/no twat shots as avatars" idea. Don't mind seeing "critter-bits" used as avatars so much, but when it comes to human parts... Bleah... I could easily survive without ever seeing another one. In all honesty, basically, when I notice a dick pic or twat shot as an avatar, the user wearing it gets dumped into the ignore bin regardless of what they might have to say.
K9GuyinTX
Citizen of Zooville
I agree with you all about the genitalia pictures as profile pics . I enjoy both sexes in the proper context, but not as the welcome mat . And this can tie back to security (thanks to Floofy for putting us back on track). If you recall the Michael Jackson case, victims were able to make positive identifications based upon photographs of his genitals alone. Maybe choose another picture that is less uniquely "you" if you want to be secure.
valleyyote
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
Well I truly am not on board with the obvious try at discrimination going on here. Fact humans are animals and to some they are just fine with seeing another type of genitals. As they say on other sites I have been on if you do not like it dont look at it and say nothing about others wanting to exercise the right to the freedom given. Looking at animal bits and telling others that human bits are ugly and disgusting is one a form of hypocrisy and two a massive form of anti human racism. In my book all genitals are welcome. Don't like it don't look but do not try and tell others how to live their lives and force your views on others please. Too often we try and screw others in so many ways just so we can live in a world that fits our nit picky narrow view of things just so we can feel comfortable. There are many things I do not like in this world but I understand that others happiness and freedom are far more important than the pointless little aspects.
MachineFox
Citizen of Zooville
Having your dick pic as your profile image is beyond rock bottom in terms of good taste. More like digging into the Marianas Trench.
inb4 "what good taste, this is Zooville and people post sex with animals", yeah no, boundaries man
inb4 "what good taste, this is Zooville and people post sex with animals", yeah no, boundaries man
I don't think that's the main issue here.
Why not discriminate? Do gays need to stop discriminating against women in their bedroom tastes too? "Just lick the pussy, bigot."
That's called speciesism, not racism, since humans are a species consisting of several races, not one race, because that would make the definition of species redundant. And no, I don't have to like human bits.
valleyyote
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
Dick picks in a forum full of other types of mammal dics is not rock bottom. Get over yourself and your unnatural hate and distaste of something that is perfectly natural, normal, and just as beautiful as any other genitals out there. Honestly I simply do not get the hatred over something that should be more loved than what others love here. Fact we are animals hairless primates to be exact. Some of us behave just like our haired counterparts or worse in some instances.
Simply wow. This is exactly the massive hypocrisy I was explaining and the anti freedom idiocy displayed by so many liberals and conservatives in every aspect of life. Simply put the average hypocritical liberal and conservative is nothing more than a spoiled, rotten child that feels theirs is the only viewpoint and opinion that truly matters and therefore everyone else should follow their lead like good, little, obedient, mindless puppets. No one is forcing you to like human bits. I don't like seeing all the nasty, unclean assholes people post here from various animals, or the dirty dingles, and other bits that show folks are less than caring about their pets health and well being, but I do not gripe because it is not my place or right to do so. I ignore it because others do not care.
The fact is I believe in true freedom in all things and will never fall on the side that displays an outright hatred, and disregard towards others rights, true freedom, and that reeks highly of hypocrisy.
Why do so many here assume I am gay? I am not btw, I am in fact quite pansexually minded. I love all things equally and would be quite happy to have any kind and gender of companion and I would love them all equally. Everything is deserving of love, kindness, and compassion. I would love to be able to spoil those thing I love and hold dear to my heart.
P
PoochPrincess
Guest
After much deliberation I decided to remove my lips and toy from being my avatar. Thanks for this thread. ?
?
?
MachineFox
Citizen of Zooville
I don't know if you misunderstood me or not, but I'm not talking about having a naughty profile picture. I'm talking about the dick being the profile picture, no extra context.
There's a time and place for posting dicks. The profile photo ain't it. This is a hill I'm willing to die on.
Also, no, not all things are the same and I don't have to like all the things. I can like or not like any type of genitals I want for literally ANY reason I want. Or no reason, just because.
I don't see how politics has anything to do with it. And it's not even correct, since having standards at any level seems to be a right wing thing nowadays, with the left being busy demolishing all standards everywhere. Also it's not a rule, it's a suggestion.
Yes, on paper you have the freedom to be a gender-ambiguous 300lb rainbow-haired lardmonster with your earlobes dangling below your shoulders and having piercings and tattoos allover but maybe don't become a irl circus freakshow. Same with the profile picture, you may have the freedom to put your dick as your profile picture, but maybe think it over.
And I don't see how me looking at people having low standards and going "ew, don't want any of that around me" is omg 'hatred' or disregard towards anyone's rights. You don't have a right to be liked or for people to accept you regardless of poor taste in things. Sorry, but I also have a right to disassociate myself from people with shit tastes.
I was just giving an example. I happen to be gay but that's neither here nor there, the example is valid regardless.
Anyway, this is extreme wankery. If you need to go on this much of a tangent over me saying that, hey, your profile picture being your dick is kinda low brow, then maybe I am wasting my time here talking to someone who goes out of their way to not get it.
Last edited:
valleyyote
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
I get it but you are just gonna keep telling me im an idiot for having a truly open, enlightened mind. I can see from many of your responses that you are truly a closed minded anti freedom bigot. It screams everyone needs to do as I say.
D
Deleted member 76481
Guest
Okay, as @FloofyNewfie suggested, I created a separate poll, so let's discuss this topic over there and bring this thread back on it's original course
www.zoovilleforum.net
Pictures of genitals as an avatar, yay, or nay?
To take the discussion from unrelated thread to it's own place for potential discussion, I do as FloofyNewfie suggested and bring out this question to the community: Should pictures of genitals be allowed as avatars?
www.zoovilleforum.net
MachineFox
Citizen of Zooville
Listen, you have all the freedom in the world to do things, but you're not entitled to my respect or approval.
(last post on this topic I swear)
The level of intelligence of the average person is surprisingly low, as I see it on the other continent too...
In countries where they go to jail for it and still expose their portraits, it's... Nonsense in words. Stupid.
There is a weak law in my country and it is not being addressed, but it is not advisable to do so. From not taking official action, even people in the area can hate you, unload from workplace, hate relatives, friends, or even hurt or steal dogs with the word "rescue."
A man lives here is already banned from most zoo and furry communities because he intentionally advertises himself as a zoo, with a portrait, a residence, publicly on his Facebook profile. And he is outraged at why he should hide this, free world, acceptance, pride etc...
I understand that point of view, but it’s crazy and poorly executed. He has been doing it for years, so far without any problems, but in the end he will anger someone very much and "will be found in a dark street".
With this behavior, will dirty a zoo community.
In countries where they go to jail for it and still expose their portraits, it's... Nonsense in words. Stupid.
There is a weak law in my country and it is not being addressed, but it is not advisable to do so. From not taking official action, even people in the area can hate you, unload from workplace, hate relatives, friends, or even hurt or steal dogs with the word "rescue."
A man lives here is already banned from most zoo and furry communities because he intentionally advertises himself as a zoo, with a portrait, a residence, publicly on his Facebook profile. And he is outraged at why he should hide this, free world, acceptance, pride etc...
I understand that point of view, but it’s crazy and poorly executed. He has been doing it for years, so far without any problems, but in the end he will anger someone very much and "will be found in a dark street".
With this behavior, will dirty a zoo community.
CookieSampler
Tourist
I kinda think the same on boobs or asses even if they aren't as common as dick pics. This is a zoo site. When I come here my brain switches to mares, does, and bitches.
Common sense is the least common of senses
Last edited:
WhiteMarkFox
Tourist
Preach brother! I wish I was born a fox lol
Rottynme
ZooVille Philanthropist
I wouldn't complain about that
VivianVacantly
Lurker
Point taken. I feel like mine have had enough obscuring my identifiable features but its better to be safe than sorry.
Sad Ky Kiske it is.
Sad Ky Kiske it is.
speakerhat91
Tourist
only images of women I've seen have been bodies only. How on earth can people identify you through that
You must live in a box inside a cave. The power of computers and identifying software has gone beyond most peoples comprehension. Google has its own photo search. If it has EVER been posted, they can find it and cross reference it.
humananimal
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
I have several times written a PM about Avatars shoving face, names a.s.o.
And usually got a thankful reply.
A remark :
The Avatar is shown as a circle, but the original photo can be seen by clicking on it twice, and I wrote once, because there was a name shown in this square.
Hehe I know the person who made that one. BTW check out DALL-E 2, it can generate any image you want, even a metal pikachu on fire driving an avocado shaped car in hamburgerland in the style of Unreal Engine 4.
SlipperyWhenWet92
Tourist
I just deliberately avoided using a profile pic altogether. The less identifiers the better.
Theunis323
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
Yeah, that's true