I don’t believe a tattoo is enough to show probable cause though? They would need to prove it actually means something and wasn’t just gotten for style like many tattoos usually are.I think getting that tattoo is a good way to get anyone caught with a felony and that's not good
it's enough, but really depends on a lot of factorsI don’t believe a tattoo is enough to show probable cause though?
The best case scenario would be being suspected by pals and so on, and that's not greatThey would need to prove it actually means something and wasn’t just gotten for style like many tattoos usually are.
Bud, they havent bothered with Due process for anything since 01/19....why would you expect that to change for a topic That 99 percent of the world finds loathsome?....If there was thinking of any sort behind ANY of the moves being made by Fearless Leader and Boorish Badenov, I'd be less alarmed....But the lunatics are in charge now....and we are all at risk. Putting a brand or a tattoo on your body is putting a target on your back. This is not a new opinion, btw....I have been saying it for 25 years, minimumI don’t believe a tattoo is enough to show probable cause though? They would need to prove it actually means something and wasn’t just gotten for style like many tattoos usually are.
2€, Might be way over thinking it. A paw print is no different than any other animal tattoo one might get on their body. Gays have coined the bear paw with the bear community. People get paw prints all the time, say a long lost pet and so on. A paw print is no clear sign. The placement however is. If you have paws above your genitalia or say on your hips where the real paws would rest during the act, that’s a dead give away. But anywhere else, it doesn’t mean anything and someone might just ask oh why did you get it, like they would for any other tattoo people have on their bodyit's enough, but really depends on a lot of factors
The best case scenario would be being suspected by pals and so on, and that's not great
Tons of normies have paw print tattoos.I think getting that tattoo is a good way to get anyone caught with a felony and that's not good
Not in EU thoughTons of normies have paw print tattoos.
Not really, more about dogs. But some people really believe zoophilia it's sole reason you'd tattoo thatDo the paws really mean that they are zoophilic?
Nonsense. I know plenty of people that have a pawprint tattoo.Not in EU though
NoDo the paws really mean that they are zoophilic?
Well, I don't. And if I'd see someone with a pawprint tattoo, I'd suspect zoophiliaNonsense. I know plenty of people that have a pawprint tattoo.
Then you’r be wrong, most of the times. All the tattoos I know are for pupplay.Well, I don't. And if I'd see someone with a pawprint tattoo, I'd suspect zoophilia
No, way too risky.And what is the best way to find out?
Any experience how?
Temp tats are nice for filming........Personally I wouldn't get that permanently. But it would be exciting to have them as those temporary sticker tattoos![]()
yeah i would agree with you there paw prints would be cute afA small paw tattoo looks adorable on a girl’s hip. It’s something I’d apply temporarily though; I’d rather not put a target on myself.
No. Did you read any of the replies here?there hot but I think its a bit of a give away to anyone who knows
Except pupplay and some oblivious zoos, what could it mean ?No. Did you read any of the replies here?
Those pawprints mean other things as well.
As if you’d asked every one of them, and as if they’d tell you.I saw them on many people. I didn't suspect them zoos and they were not into pupplay.
Whatever the person wants it to mean.Except pupplay and some oblivious zoos, what could it mean ?
lol no you are very wrong, a simple tattoo is not even close to probable cause, most people get a paw print tattoo in memory of a lost loved one, please don’t spread misinformationit's enough, but really depends on a lot of factors
The best case scenario would be being suspected by pals and so on, and that's not great