Missing vid

dogsexromania

dogsexromania

Citizen of Zooville
Hello there

2 days ago i spoted a new vid in the female/malw dog section a yung chick on the floor gettong it from a nice doggo, ppl enjoyed it yet someone said its underage, i watched it and the girl in question was a irnal lookin 19-20y old to me and auddenly it gets deleted, since it was new material wanted to save it but i was on my phone when i got to my pc it was gone, now do thw devs have some proof or it might be 17 on stead of 20 and thats enough because i am alergic to underage and u can see her face and as i said to me it seemed ok
 
FloofyNewfie said:
Damn, that must be rough. You can't even get 50ft from a school. Shopping trips must be brutal. How do you even survive going outside?

I think the video you're asking about was deleted by @Oldman for being underaged.
Click to expand...
Ofc i thought thaya the case only i has the feeling someone just flagged it and poof , to me she was a nornal 19 20 y old and tbh was a nice vid . But if its consodered underage well whatever.
I get it if it is underage its not just bad but puts the site in danger.
 
Yeah. Too many credible reports. Also froze the vid when her face was shown and it was definitely underaged. The background also leads to underaged, but not entirely.
 
@Oldman https://www.zoovilleforum.net/threads/mi-primera-vez.100471/
Next instance, ban whoever you wish from the likes and wipe it.
We will probably be seeing it more often for a while.

Well let it be known that the moment you post this video, you are fucked.

I quite like the idea you invented - if it looks underage it is underage.
So if someone has the need to just about get by the rules by posting something that almost can be underage, it is their poor decision.
There are petabytes of porn available, yet the ones that seem almost or are underage attract a lot of attention.
Well, if you can not live with adult looking porn, then it is your mistake.
 
Last edited:
Well even is she looked normal age to me have to agree with u guys if its questionable go with the worst option and and the ban who likes it is a good idea only in questionable cases like this , u can watch it on a phone like i did and not notice it and like it , but who ever reposts stuff that got banned for this ye nuke
 
Oldman said:
Yeah. Too many credible reports. Also froze the vid when her face was shown and it was definitely underaged. The background also leads to underaged, but not entirely.
Click to expand...
Was it the one with the kid in front of a birdcage getting railed by a shep-ish looking pooch while a cat looks on from the background? If so, yeah, no question - If she's above 14 (in that flick - obviously, she's had time to get older since it first started circulating a few years ago), I'll eat your jock-strap without ketchup...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top