SxaBeast
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
Whats its url?Yes it is but using the same software as ZV so I think it would work just as well here.
Whats its url?Yes it is but using the same software as ZV so I think it would work just as well here.
Whats its url?
Agreed, DD....and Ive been saying that pretty much the same way for twenty plus years. We do get a lot more actual females here than most users think. But we have no idea how many come in, get verbally assaulted immediately, and leave, never to return. We probably can't stop that behavior. Some of these "Voldemorte junior grades" were dragged, not raised....but we can make it hard for them to repeat offenses. Since nothing here disappears, if someone is accused, it can be checked out fairly quickly.1. No spamming, Flaming, Harassing, stalking. Users with multiple reports will be receiving infractions, or a ban. Depending on severity.
At what point does spamming dozens of "female appearing" profiles become stalking? I understand that members here have the ability to delete any comment posted to their profile wall. And that generally is where any complaints about anything posted in such fashion generally ends.
Stalking is a problem here, or has been in the past. In particular, one individual that many older members reference as if he is a real life Voldemorte.
Setting that aside for the moment, does anyone else think it might be time to visit both what constitues "stalking behavior" and how that is treated in the existing rules of the site?
This, like any site that deals with sex, is a male dominated space, and one of the constant complaints here is that "there are no women" or the general lack of a female presence here in any great numbers in context to the number of males here.
To be fair, it's been my overall understanding that the more flamboyant versions of stalking behavior at least does get dealt with when it's brought to the attention of site moderation.
I have to ask though, why any member here is allowed to constantly seek out and comment on an unlimited amount of female accounts daily? I'm NOT suggesting comments on profiles should be stopped or curtailed, but I'm not the only one who thinks that commenting on 20 female accounts a day, particularly when that is more or less an account's ONLY posting on this site, is at the very least, stalking behavior. And, I for one would like to understand WHY that type of posting behavior gets a pass?
It's not targeted at any one individual but is it any less a "behavior" or a tendancy because it isn't on 1 specific person? And because it's not targeted to one member, does that make it any less creepy and unsettling to the female members of this site? What about the fact that it IS targeting one specific gender? Why doesn't that constitute a few red flags that should maybe be addressed a bit more clearly in the rules?
In past reporting of this behavior, things that have come up are posting the literal exact same message more than 4 times is a violation. But, that's spam, not stalking. Other times, what comes back by response is that users have the ability to delete any comments.
I do realize that making a rule change here is a bit of an uphill climb and that doing so will increase the work load on the moderation team, but I do think it's time someone drew out a clear line limiting what appears to me to be an increasing amount of under the radar, serial stalking of female profiles.
Thoughts?
Well said. That is pretty much exactly my point.As it was said it's a lot of work for mods, a slippery slope. But a very good point. The female members, should feel comfortable. There is a section for people wanting to meet. I don't go there, because it's thirsty guys. I rarely post or respond to any post by a female, not because I wouldn't like to chat with them. But because I refuse to be one of those guys. I'm a old zoo, decades of experience. And yes had a female partner for many years. Cancer took her. Enough said there! This is the best zoo site out there. But sadly so many thirsty guys. Females want to feel safe, not be pounced on. I'd say back off guys but wouldn't help. Anyone feel free to dm me glad to offer advise or just polite chat. And to make this very clear, my girl is not available!! I don't!! My pup pup. Quit asking!!
Yep, any idea what can be done? I haven't a clue? It's online, so us good guys can't bring the bad ones behind the barn so to say. Thread cought my eye I had to jump on my soapbox. I hate seeing it I see a post by a female would like to comment a polite response. But won't . I get dms from guys wanting to ?? Have my pup? I don't, I make that clear. Yes I got her thinking that. But .. that's my pup pup . You might as well ask if you could f... My daughter. I just am on soapbox tonight sry. I'm just as thirsty as the rest. But jeez be polite, lol sry I get down nowWell said. That is pretty much exactly my point.
People who want to chat and/or meet, I see no harm there.
It's the relentless behavior by a few, call it what you will, that makes this place a place where a lot of women feel pretty exposed.
People are real quick to call this a community, and in some ways, it is, but too, this isn't just a moderation issue, it's a community issue. And while some people are willing to stand up on this issue, most are indifferent, and when not indifferent, pretty passive.
I don't think many people are FOR harrassment of female members.......but, is that the bar here?
Outside a rule adjustment to limit the behavior, I don't know. There IS no fix for the behavior, the best it gets is limiting how much it can be done. If not officially, then by the community at large showing any interest in doing so themselves.Yep, any idea what can be done? I haven't a clue?
Lead fixes a lot, how bad things need to get before people start remembering how we done it in the old world is the real question.Outside a rule adjustment to limit the behavior, I don't know. There IS no fix for the behavior, the best it gets is limiting how much it can be done. If not officially, then by the community at large showing any interest in doing so themselves.
Rapes and murder still happen even with severe penalties, so I don't honestly believe there is a final fix.
At the end of the day, I don't really expect there will be any change. I have very little faith in humanity as it is, I have even less faith that strangers in an anonymous online group will do anything that alters that outlook.
Also at the end of the day, I have no power to be that change either, outside not being a part of the problem.
I think the larger zooville community needs to consider what they really want the site to be. Zoo oriented including females or an all male zoo echo chamber.
I couldn't agree more.Outside a rule adjustment to limit the behavior, I don't know. There IS no fix for the behavior, the best it gets is limiting how much it can be done. If not officially, then by the community at large showing any interest in doing so themselves.
Rapes and murder still happen even with severe penalties, so I don't honestly believe there is a final fix.
At the end of the day, I don't really expect there will be any change. I have very little faith in humanity as it is, I have even less faith that strangers in an anonymous online group will do anything that alters that outlook.
Also at the end of the day, I have no power to be that change either, outside not being a part of the problem.
I think the larger zooville community needs to consider what they really want the site to be. Zoo oriented including females or an all male zoo echo chamber.
I'm guessing. But I think there's something in the maintenance tab in the admin side that can refresh all accounts no matter how old.Even the porn section is locked out on ZC until the requirements are met, unfortunately no changes that are implemented will affect older accounts.
Makes me wonder if there's a plugin that could be installed to auto delete threads from specific sub forums after x time of inactivity. Auto purge personals and requests after a few months of no replies.Removing the non zoo section may get rid of half of them .If some wonder why certain areas get cleaned out is because I just decided to clear up the non zoo section and some personals.
Regarding personals most of those profiles have never logged in, and people use them to hijack and advertise themselves.
Or they think because they have a male dog, they can use its knot as a fishing lure to bring a woman to them to then screw themselves, with or without the dog present. I seen a ton of those in my time on various sites, they might as well be prostituting the dog, with the form of payment being dipping their own stick as well.Their primary drive is fap material and all of that, and they're the ones that are constantly replying "hot!!" and all of that to every other bit of porn that comes across.
They seem to have this idea that if a woman would allow a dog to fuck her, then she either must be easy, and/or open to all sorts of perverted shit.
These folks have no clue what respect is for humans or animals, and got here based on their depravity, which oftentimes has included a pedo/fence hopper/rape type element.
Unfortunately, there's a large amount of them here, but our hands become tied, also unfortunately, because the way the laws look at things, we all basically fall under the same umbrella as far as they're concerned.
I do not in any way want this to become an all male echo chamber, and I'm saddened by the females that have left, likely due to the harassment.
I'd say we should have a written rule on that... with a ban hammer tied to the other end..How about those that see the females of this place, or those they think are females, as their personal providers of walking material?
Those who demand, and not request, the ones they write to to provide them with whatever it is they feel like they currently need in order to rub one out.
Those that treat you like the only reason for your existence is to aid in their release of sperm.
Those that become extremely angry and hostile if you, a worthless whore, have the audacity to refuse them what they just demanded that you, an utterly degraded and low form of life, must give them.
It's not against the rules to demand to be served that, and reporting them results in nothing but a "Just ignore" suggestion from the staff.
But, in my opinion, these people are also a huge reason for "the lack of females" at this place.
So, should repeated actions like this have repercussions, or is the current order where they are allowed to roam free and act however they want in DM the best opinion?
"When someone does a foolish thing you should say it is a foolish thing. They can still continue to do it, but at least the TRUTH is where it needs to be."There's a thought behind that behavior, and while we may be able to curb the behavior (better than nothing), curbing or changing the thoughts behind the behavior isn't so easy, and youre still left with a piece of shit..
Me neither. Not a single person, that's not one of the earlier described people, that I've talked to have said that they enjoy getting direct messages from such people.I have zero issues with just getting them the fuck out..
That's nice, thinking good of others.I also strongly suspect a Pareto distribution in this issue which suggests that a significant portion of bad experiences can be prevented with the removal of just a few problematic accounts.
Few is a relative number. I’d hope to eliminate less than %10 of active accounts that represent the worst of the problem. But I freely admit that could be very optimistic as I have no data specific to this site.That's nice, thinking good of others.
Sadly, it's not only a few. A couple of hundreds of even thousands would need to be removed to have the "problematic accounts" gone.
No......not really. Some yes, but mostly not, because everyone knows, more than 4 gets you a spam warning. So, you have some of that, but mostly not.What OP is describing I'd say falls under spamming more than stalking. If you're spamming the same copypasta either at every woman on the site, or repeatedly spamming it at the same woman, I think its reasonable for mods to ban them for spamming. IMO stalking is something that should be addressed on a case by case basis rather than trying to make an official rule declaring the number of messages that constitutes stalking, (obviously if a user complains of harassment and the harasser doesn't stop, or theres a clear legitimate threat, ban them.
TBH, while i feel guys who don't know when to leave a woman alone are turds, I also think that women can speak for themselves and let the mods know when someone is harassing them, and that its kind of infantilizing and insulting for men to be trying to set the rules of when other men are allowed to contact women
Dunno how old you are bud, or how long youve been on the Net unsupervised, but tbh....You're not paying attention.TBH, while i feel guys who don't know when to leave a woman alone are turds, I also think that women can speak for themselves and let the mods know when someone is harassing them, and that its kind of infantilizing and insulting for men to be trying to set the rules of when other men are allowed to contact women
I do. Whenever I get an instant messenger report, every one involved gets a healthy slap, then I go into their history and look for more. I will admit that some may squeak by if I'm tired enough and pass out before I can finish, or it's too vague. They would have to specifically ask for their ID.It was done to "curb" the number of "what's your chat id" messages lurkers sent, but since others could still post to lurker's profiles and lurkers could "reply" to an existing post on the other person's profile, it really wasn't effective. The idiots who can post to the lurkers just ask for them cause "for some reason I can't pm you" and the lurker would proceed to break the rules, and since the mods won't punish the idiot for leading the lurker to the rule breakage...
I don't deny that tons of men are absolute shitheads, that tons of men need to learn to respect women, but when it comes for calling for changes to policy in the name of protecting a particular group, I think members of that particular group should the be ones making the call for policy change.Dunno how old you are bud, or how long youve been on the Net unsupervised, but tbh....You're not paying attention.
Yes....Women are grownups, or should be, and can speak for themselves.....but why do they have to on this sort of problem?
A). Why do males( sorry, these shitheads are not MEN) think its okay to abuse women, physically, mentally, verbally?
B). Would you, as a Male, accept such abuse?
C). Do many of our male users accept such behavior because its invisible to them?
D). Are they thus enabling bad behavior on the part of other males?
That's an excellent point. And one I hadn't thought of in those terms.I don't deny that tons of men are absolute shitheads, that tons of men need to learn to respect women, but when it comes for calling for changes to policy in the name of protecting a particular group, I think members of that particular group should the be ones making the call for policy change.
As a bisexual, i hate when straight people go around declaring whats homophobic and what isnt, i always say that im perfectly capable of getting offended on my own and dont need straight people getting offended for me, if something offends me let me be the one to tell you - im simply saying that i feel that the same logic should apply to letting women be the ones to say if they want something done for their protection.