• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Is it gay to want to take dog dick but be repulsed by human males

Title

  • Total voters
    253
Im zoo-bi but very human-straight. It's a totally different world of expeirence in physical, emotional and energy connection. The universe does not revolve around penis vs vagina.
 
I'd say no. I'm also into male dogs I do not desire to have one to mount me, but I do enjoy oral with a male dog, I also like mares and stallions. I do not believe it makes you gay.
 
Yes that's gay. However if you're worried about labels you would be a bisexual zoophilic and straight regarding other human beings.
 
Before answering this question, let's ask ourselves, what difference does the answer make? I guess there are pragmatic reasons why somebody would identify as a dicker or a dickee, but otherwise...
 
Well, I'm completely uninterested in humans of any description. I've done all sorts of sexual activities with animals, mostly dogs, of both genders. I dislike labels; I have had too many of them pasted on me that don't pertain to my sexual preferences.
 
Nope. It would be like a prostate massage in my eyes. Nothing gay about feeling good.
 
Neither male nor gay, so my opinion is of limited value. But why should men guilt trip themselves into not experiencing the joy of being mounted if that's what they want? It's a powerful emotional and physical experience and life is too short.
 
Voted "no" by default, because labels are kind of fucking stupid. There is nothing new under the sun--sex-wise, or otherwise--but the concept of
"being gay" is pretty fucking new, in the grand scheme of things, and too many people try to prove that it is some intrinsic and congenital quality of their being, for me to believe that they aren't mostly trying to prove it to themselves. Just have the sex you want to have. Any label you give yourself is ultimately made up, and is ultimately just as false.
 
i think sexuality is a vast spectrum. no, a 3D fucking decahedron. there are so many elements, being attracted to masculinity, femininity, genital preferences, kinks, etc. gay, straight, bi, pan; they’re helpful labels, but they don’t define us as humans with holes and poles who wanna fuck and be fucked.
 
It is gay. Now, the devil is in details. I'm straight for humans and pretty much gay for dogs. But still the whole ordeal tells me I'm gay and that's it
 
68.8 percent of the zoo community apparently :husky_laughing::husky_happysmile::husky_wink:
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2025-02-03-22-22-59~2.png
    Screenshot_2025-02-03-22-22-59~2.png
    102.2 KB · Views: 18
Last edited:
When it comes to humans, I've always thought that "homosexual" and "heterosexual" were too limiting of terms. I think "gynophile" (attracted to women/femininity) and "androphile" (attracted to men/masculinity) are much more accurate to how people feel. I think there's clearly something different going on in the brain of a man who is attracted to cis women, trans women, and femboys, than there is going on in the brain of a man who is attracted to cis men, trans men.

How does this apply to dogs? I have no idea. Male and female dogs are physically 99% the same, the only difference is the penis or vagina. I think it says something that it's very common among male zoophiles to be attracted to male dogs but not attracted to male humans, and I don't think it's just homophobia or sexual repression that explains it.
 
Categorizing it into one neat little word is oversimplifying. I like women, although I'm not repulsed by men I don't find them attractive. When it comes to dogs, I still am attracted to females but #1 attraction is to males. I love being a males bitch/bottom and would have to say having a penis and cum inside you willingly, is pretty gay. 😅 Without going to far into this complicated subject and sticking to the titled question. Yes sex with a member of the same sex is by definition gay/homosexual though I would technically be bisexual. I'm pretty much over trying to slap a label on it, but do appreciate being technically correct, so this is only one of many threads on the subject I've commented on. The more I talk about it, the more the lines blur and a clear definition/term seems near impossible to reach.
 
Question answered by an artificial intelligence:

A man's sexual attraction to male animals does not fall within the definition of homosexuality, which refers to the attraction to individuals of the same sex of the same species.

Paraphilia, on the other hand, is a term that encompasses various atypical sexual behavior patterns, which may involve objects, situations, or individuals that do not fit into social norms.

Zoophilia, which is the sexual attraction to animals, is considered a paraphilia. However, it is important to note that not all people who are attracted to animals engage in sexual behavior with them.

There are different types of paraphilia, and each of them has its own characteristics and implications. It is essential to seek information and professional support if you or someone you know is dealing with a paraphilia.
 
I'd say that letting an animal penetrate you is a very gay behaviour. I mean, gay people always fantasize about big, brute men fucking them, with almost animalistic traits... Male animals fulfill and exceed these "requisites" very well. I can think about anything more "gay" than that. Personally, as my relationships with dogs don't involve men, I'm totally at peace without the labeling 😄.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top