How we discuss "consent" is problematic.

[mareseminator]

Classic case of consent. A “ friend “ of mine was horny. He is deeply attracted to mares, loves his mares, cares for them as if they are queens(they are). He walk out of his house on a warm humid July night around 2am. Grabbed a step stool and walked across his yard and stepped over a single wire fence that any creature who was not content could escape with absolutely no effort.
He walked thru the pasture in the pitch black until he felt the presence of his best friend and lover in this world walking up to him with the most welcoming winnie you have ever heard.
One thing led to another and after hugging caressing and kissing this friend is balls deep in an untied mare with nothing between them other than the musky scent of a mare and the sweat of a excited man.
From out of nowhere a second mare backs her wet vulva into this friends buttocks. When he leaves this pasture both mares have a human males semen in their vaginas both are happy and calm and neither had a halter on and neither was in heat.

 

[ᴎoɘA]

Most of the time when I am debating with someone who's already made up their mind I reply to them but the audience I my words are intended for are the other people reading and not necessarily the person I am replying to.

Good point, but i still think we need to implement new strategies if we want to see some actual change, if we are constantly engaging anti-zoos individually it is most likely on their turf so not only are the people we are discussing things with ignorant but the people who listen to the conversation are, too.