Whoa buddy, chill. They're just saying you can't be so demanding and be like "Prove you're a woman to me!" TBH it's weird and creepy! Not to mention it makes you come across as untrustworthy.
Not to mention, there's no way to do it.
He mentioned having a woman hold a sign up next to her naked boobs, right?
- Some fakes steal photos from the Web. Sure. That's lame. They always get busted. The proposed "fix" is to have her holding a sign with "her" screen name. Well, that proves nothing. Some men ask their wife/gf to pose with a sign so he can use her persona. (Shit, if *I* wanted to, my wife would. She'd laugh about it and do it for me, no problem. And I can't be the only husband with a kinky wife in here.) You want video? Lots of the video I've seen was clearly taken by the husband, not the wife. Which one of them posted it using the "real woman" profile? The pictures and videos prove nothing. We have no WAY to know
that "she" even realizes her photo and video were posted (and downloaded and disseminated throughout the Web. Which is
another reason people here don't like to verify).
- And then, damn boy, watch what you're asking for. Seems like you're also saying
flat-chested zoo women don't count? (You asshole.
Boobs don't make a woman. One more suggestion like this, and we'll revoke your manhood. You're making us XY types look bad).
- Plus, you all know, right, that m2f trans women on hormones often have beautiful, natural, gorgeous boobs? (we know a couple and it gives "firsthand knowledge" a certain, racey edge when I tell you how I know they're real boobs, not silicone). And how can you tell XY augmented boobs from XX augmented boobs anyway? So, are
YOU going to be the one to tell t-gurls they're not women? (There will be some women who agree with you, but you know what? I'm going to stand way, WAY back here down the hallway... no huh uh, instead I mean, the parking lot, ... parking lot
across the street, when you drop *
that* grenade in here).
Verification schemes don't work.
Look, I've been a mod on a couple different sites, and a little, hidden KiK one just for zoos. You came in the main room we used as an application room, and if you passed verification you were allowed into our hidden room. We had to limit the available memberships (cap in KiK is 50) so membership would be balanced M:F, not all male. We verified new member candidates to fill seats as they opened via live video chats placed to a mod.
As a mod, I was watching this one "woman's" application who opted to flash her breasts at me as we were talking (not required, but some women applicants have no problem with that, and really *want* to verify that way, or more -- full nudity. That was not required, but, hey, w/e). Suddenly it occurred to me that the camera (iPhone or whatever) shooting her wasn't in
*her* hand and wasn't on a stand. It was moving a little bit. So I stopped her interview to ask, "Um, who's holding the camera?" She was quiet. "Who's in the room there with you?"
The gal stopped, looked beyond the lens (obviously looking to the person holding it), waiting to be told what to say. I said, "Show me who's holding the camera."
*click* End of chat.
Dude. Any scheme you come up with to "verify" someone, there will be a man who rises to the challenge: says, "I can beat the system." You'd think it would turn them away. But naw. See, if they *beat* your system of verification, they just gained additional credibility they couldn't have *without* a verification system.
That's it, bottom line. Be careful what you ask for. The verification schemes don't weed out fakes if they get gamed. They do the opposite, giving fake profiles credibility they could *only* get through a verification system. It's a great big hassle that undermines the "benefit" guys like Curious78 hoped to gain. He's deluding himself, bolstering an illusion.
He'd be *much* better off just taking the time to know the people he was chatting with, without "proof" of who they are. I think it's *much* more reliable than an upfront verification device.
That's why I agree with ZTHorse's decision and explanation of Zooville policy from the other thread -- ground we're just rehashing here. The best way to "verify" someone is getting to know them, letting the relationship with them build.
I'm pretty positive I've made a couple good female zoo friends here. If not? Wow.
Good job! (But doesn't really matter. No discussion I've been in outside this one really was all that gender-critical.)
Say, that's another thing. What is it you need to talk about that *is* so gender critical, anyway?