dalmatianlover
Citizen of Zooville
Thank goodness for metadata, sometimes ?
8 real ladies here? I was certain we were at zero, just those are better at pretending they are real ?
AllyKat
www.zoovilleforum.net
This user sent me this photo of her. which can already be found on the internet easily. @Oldman
Sent me a photo with face easily but couldn't even hold up three fingers to verify themselves lol. Said they "couldn't because they're maybe hacked" lmaooo.
I deserve a janitor title here. Also revising my "amount of actual women on ZV" from 12 to 8.
WetNWanton
Tourist
It is super scary. I neber know who I am talking to!
Ted Danson Machine
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
Same, but that's just because of my Alzheimer's
4EverCharm
Zooville Settler
Yes... this can be an issue....
Ted Danson Machine
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
says who? what?.......i'm confusedYes... this can be an issue....
4EverCharm
Zooville Settler
No need to worry....did you forget to take meds again this morning...
Ted Danson Machine
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
um................first, how do you know I take meds.............2nd...........yes, yes I did....No need to worry....did you forget to take meds again this morning...
4EverCharm
Zooville Settler
I have special powers....
sh2564
Zooville Settler
I’m curious how accurate these reverse image searches are. I got a result for an image sent to me that was originally posted in 2010 per tiny eye, and another that wasn’t found. The user claims their image was shared, but for that to be true the 2010 date stamp would have to be very, very inaccurate (based on the age of the person in the photo).
I guess I want to make sure I’m not unfairly calling someone out since the other image they sent wasn’t found. Perhaps there is some inaccuracy in the reverse image searches?
I guess I want to make sure I’m not unfairly calling someone out since the other image they sent wasn’t found. Perhaps there is some inaccuracy in the reverse image searches?
Goattobeloved
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
Reverse image search looks for symilar images. Shows the results, do you can just make sure by yourself if that is the same image.
Normally they provide the source, so date usually comes from the context more that the metadata. Go to the site, check the context.
No results: Might be real, only-for-you photo, or just hunted from an unindexed site.
Possible errors:
- Real photo that the user or someone else has posted elsewhere.
- Results based on metadata (if the camera is out of date, metadata may be from 2010, but mist times people manage to omit metadata.
- VTE (Very twisted error) if someone has an accout somewhere and edits a 2010 post to replace the photo with an actual one... but honestly... quite improbable
sh2564
Zooville Settler
It says “first found” on such and such date, so I presume that’s not metadata? The direct links to the image doesn’t work, but it seems to be from a couple of porn websites. So I guess the date found refers to the date it was posted to that porn site?
Goattobeloved
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
Yes, usually it would be that.
If the site is not there anymore, you can still try sonething. Copy the address, paste it in google search bar.
If you see the link inbthe result, there is usually an option of "view cache", which has some recent captureif that page.
The other option is waybackmachine
sh2564
Zooville Settler
Based on this and the flow of the conversation I’m pretty sure it’s a fake account. Within a few messages the user was asking for personal content and the sent the fake image without a request for one. And now that I’ve questioned them and asked for a verifiable photo they’ve disappeared. So I’m gonna say 95% sure it’s bs
sh2564
Zooville Settler
Ok, so I believe I came across another one:
@Clarreknine messaged me o out my dog and we quickly took it to another chat app. On that app ‘she’ immediately began asking for personal content and then sent an unsolicited picture she claimed was herself. The picture was found on tineye originally posted in 2010. She denied it and said someone stole her photo and shared it. When I asked her to clarify because I thought she was fake she ended conversation.
So, while I can’t be 100%, it seems highly probably that this is a fake account. Evidence posted below:
@Clarreknine messaged me o out my dog and we quickly took it to another chat app. On that app ‘she’ immediately began asking for personal content and then sent an unsolicited picture she claimed was herself. The picture was found on tineye originally posted in 2010. She denied it and said someone stole her photo and shared it. When I asked her to clarify because I thought she was fake she ended conversation.
So, while I can’t be 100%, it seems highly probably that this is a fake account. Evidence posted below:
Attachments
Hmmmmm, well since what she is claiming is not on this website, we will not ban. I will however leave this up for everyone to see. If she posts a pic here and claims it, I will ban. Another mod, may go ahead and ban if they want. I won't complain.
Not quite yet. Missing a key post. Lets see if it posts the qualifying instant ban words.
Aikijudoka
I can't say it they won't do it.
Ted Danson Machine
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
Oh my! And it vroke the cardinal rule it claimed those pics as her own. BANNED!
The picture is similar, but not the same. I would have to have concrete proof like the one above before I will ban.
HyeAcheeg
Goattobeloved
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
Just make sure they claim to be the person in the image.
Me, and a few others have images that might not be exactly our real terrestrial mug, we just do not claim to be them.
?
Me, and a few others have images that might not be exactly our real terrestrial mug, we just do not claim to be them.
?
Goattobeloved
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
Well, no one should be using own real identifiable images on a site of this nature, I tend to think many people would just hunt a "nice image" from Google.
Since there are no rules about avatar images, I would not call a insta-perma-ban on that.
Different thing if it can be assumed there IS an intend to catfish (which, honestly, is the most likely in 95% of cases ?)
My existence on this forum is not based on looking for a human partner. I very rarely care whether I am talking to a woman, a man or a sentient teapot.
Can someone explain to me why we care whether someone is using a fake profile picture or pretends to be a particular gender?
There already is this thread that exposes fake profiles in case someone finds this information useful. On top of that anyone can use the ignore button to seemingly get rid of inconvenient users.
temporaryacc
Citizen of Zooville
Damn I’m young and got an exotic name (I’d never post it here lol) I geuss I’m a fake. (Though I don’t dare step foot in the god forsaken hell hole that is the meet up section…There are so many of them. The majority of young girls and couples are fake. Most of the time it's just men that are trying to get sex chats or private videos to masturbate to.
They are Usualy easy to spot.
"hi, my name is (insert random girl name here, Usualy it's some exotic and uncommon name) iam 19f (if they tell their gender and Usualy joung age bevore anything else, it's almost for sure a man) and trying to get into the lifestyle (anyone who uses the word "lifestyle" in regards of zoo is either fake, or has absolutely no clue about zoophilia). I startet my zoo life early (for sure?) and now searching for an owner to be his dogslut. "(if they use any self degrading words, than it's 99% a man.)
Also they always say they have no animal of their own or something, but if you look up their profiles, they own everything, from horses, over dogs, to pigs. This is to attract both thirsty non owners and owners. Also they Usualy only post an introduction, maybe answer once or twice, but never Adress the elephant in the room (that they are fakes). Than they never answer again or participate in any threads except their own introduction, because the probably got what they whant: a shit load of pm from thirsty horndogs.
An example:
24F and feeling guilty...
Hey everyone. I've got to prepare for work so I won't have time to write much... here goes: I'm Tilla. 24, female (AFAB). And nowadays it seems like the only thing I can get off to is zoo stuff. When I was younger, in my preteens, I tried something with a dog I was dogsitting. He was...
There we probably have a fake.
Ever heard of someone named "Tilla"? Probably not, so first red flag.
Posts here age and gender imidialy in the topic and early in the post itself. Second red flag.
Goes on about telling that "she" did some stuff when she was even younger. 3rd red flag.
Puts herself into a vulnerable position by shouting out to the world about feeling guilty about it, yet still goes on about explecit telling everyone about that she regularly masturbate and cums to zoo porn. 4th red flag.
(it should be now clear already that this is almost certainly a male user)
5th red flag: just openly tells everybody details about her and her friends sex life.... Don't forget, this is her introduction.
6th big red flag: she wants to post allegedly own videos. (little hint, that's just written there to let needy men think, that there is some never seen wank material on the line)
7th red flag and final nail in the coffin: her first post elswere is about her getting of to woman being bound down and abused by dogs, and men getting blowjobs from animals, both very, VERY typical male horn dog Phantasies, but Usualy noexistant around woman
This, you can forget about. We can not, and will not be held liable for ANYTHING that arises from using our website. This is about the same as someone suing their crack dealer for selling them powdered sugar.
We simply do not have the enforcement capability or system advanced enough to detect those. It is up to the end user to be as smart as possible about talking to conplete strangers on ANY website. If someone claims something that is clearly not theirs, we will take action. If something does not seem right, we will allow people to warm others about it.
You have to to better than that. How about researching some of the pics she posted and clearly claimed its her? Those you need to post, not just the avatar.HyeAcheeg
another one