• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Don’t Wake the Mods!

ShanoirII said:
case in point:
View attachment 181256
Click to expand...
As well as this...

1627800780245.png

The biggest problem I see is that he tends to mix human waists/butts/thighs with animal legs and feet for the rear end. Often with the stomach, it's more of a human-like looking stomach while the rest of the upper body is more animal like. The paws are too large, but that's probably on purpose.

Also that pussy... and pretty much all the canine pussies that he draws, just doesn't look right at all. (It's like, I know what he's GOING for, but it's like he's never seen one in real life...... which is a very real possibility. Lol)
 
FloofyNewfie said:
mix human waists/butts/thighs with animal legs and feet
Click to expand...
i think he knows the exact parts that most furries would like to see physically, and tries to inflate each trait like a puzzle with pieces from different sets
FloofyNewfie said:
The feet are too large, but that's probably on purpose
Click to expand...
definitely on purpose, the paw fetish is real over there on e621 especially in his gallery
FloofyNewfie said:
it's like he's never seen one in real life...... which is a very real possibility. Lol
Click to expand...
if you draw genitalia that looks too "normal" for any animal on e621, you run the risk of getting comments moaning about "the detail is almost zoophilic" or "a bit too close to bestiality for me" or the good old "how real is too real to allow for animal porn?" in the comments section. he may be wanting to avoid that, i know some artists definitely do. basically what artists usually do is turn their character into a chimera where its entire body is one distinct species, except for the genitalia and sometimes even anus are human. klaus doberman has especially suffered for these types of whiny comments.
i know that some artists have certainly seen real genitalia. some artists from tailshigh actually referenced popular zoo porn images very obviously that i and other people in the comments of e621 recognized when we saw their art. gdane shamelessly flat out stated that they literally render their horse and dog penis textures from images they took of horse and dog penises. in psy101's case, im not sure
 
ShanoirII said:
i think he knows the exact parts that most furries would like to see physically, and tries to inflate each trait like a puzzle with pieces from different sets
Click to expand...
Hmm... to me it starts hitting the uncanny valley, I'm sure I'm not the only one it does this to.

ShanoirII said:
if you draw genitalia that looks too "normal" for any animal on e621, you run the risk of getting comments moaning about "the detail is almost zoophilic" or "a bit too close to bestiality for me" or the good old "how real is too real to allow for animal porn?" in the comments section.
Click to expand...
From what I've seen those comments are usually hidden due to having around -32 downvotes. While usually the rebuttals such as "Bro, it's just art. Get over it." or "If you don't like animal genitalia then blacklist it." Usually receive a more positive reaction. At least, that's what I normally see.

ShanoirII said:
i know that some artists have certainly seen real genitalia. some artists from tailshigh actually referenced popular zoo porn images very obviously that i and other people in the comments of e621 recognized when we saw their art. gdane shamelessly flat out stated that they literally render their horse and dog penis textures from images they took of horse and dog penises.
Click to expand...
Oh definitely. I'm sure you've heard of Danger Doberman as well? Some of his art pieces are just well known screenshots of popular zoo porno with his character in their place. There's also this line art animation of a guy having sex with a female dog that's obviously a retrace of a well known video. I'm actually surprised that he and the commenter haven't been banned as of yet, since it seems that E621 is ban happy when it comes to bestiality and what they consider "creepy comments."

ShanoirII said:
in psy101's case, im not sure
Click to expand...
My best guess is that he merely copied the "generally accepted" but more like "generally used" version of canines pussies within the furry community. Which is a (Y) that pretty much flatly representing a canine's pussy. But I have talked to Psy101 a bit in the past and he claims he's "zoo friendly, but 100% not a zoo himself. He just likes feral art." I haven't spoken to him in years. So who knows?
 
ShanoirII said:
thats kind of like how literally every penis on e621 is either canine or equine. bears have flares, cats have knots, etc its just crazy. they even draw avians with cetacean penises for goodness sake.
Click to expand...
Indeed, and it's often hilarious. I cringe at those almost as much as I cringe at cervical penetration.

DaneLover1 said:
That’s why he posted it, because I never saw his old avatar. Go look at the DWTM group chat ?
Click to expand...
Oop... didn't know y'all were talking about people that have changed their avatars. Lol.
 
Just listened to angel by shaggy. I haven’t heard it since before I got my Dane girl. She gives that song a new meaning for me ❤️
2
 
3 i dont think ive heard of that one
but i have been listening to this song on loop for several minutes that really gives me nostalgia (which, coincidentally, is named "Lost and Forgotten")
 

Attachments

  • 266980_Lost_and_Forgotten.mp3
    6.2 MB
4
You should listen to it, it’s a good song. Or maybe I only think that because I’m a hopeless romantic when it comes to that lady ?.
 
7 i dont usually categorize my music either, i just listen to what sounds i like
such as that Lost and Forgotten song i just linked up there. i dont even know what category that could possibly fall into
 
8
Right now I’m just listening to whatever YouTube plays next. It’s an interesting mix of songs I will say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top