• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Dog sperm as a way to prevent unwanted pregnancy in women.

Playing very fast and loose with the words "know" and "fact".

There's actually a biologist on this forum who posted an incredibly well researched and sourced and cited breakdown of why this doesn't happen. I can't be asked to find the post but it had much better sources than "dude, trust me".

Stop presenting your fantasies as facts before someone ends up pregnant accidentally.
Maybe getting them "oops!" pregnant is the 2nd fetish...
 
Dog sperm as a way to prevent unwanted pregnancy in women
628.jpg
 
I was pretty sure I read that the sperm causes the egg to collapse and if you want to be honest all you did here in response to 2 people was telling them that they were just fantisizing so the attitude like you brought hardcore science into the discussion is not helpful because you didnt
"I'm pretty sure I read it somewhere" is leagues away from "we know for a fact", I read somewhere the earth was flat and that's obviously false.

Don't pretend you know things for a fact when you really don't and people who believe you could end up with extremely unwanted results if they follow your advice.
 
I read somewhere the earth was flat and that's obviously false.
... oh... so you're one of those Flat-Earth-Deniers... ;) hahahaha
Kidding obviously.

The only thing I could see impacting anything is if the environment was flooded with a lot of dog semen, which makes the environment mildly more acidic.

A human vagina has a PH of 3.5-4. Human semen is 7.2-8.0. Canine being 6.4-6.8. This means that as far as "affecting" the PH of a human vagina... canine semen will have LESS of an affect than human semen on changing the PH of a vagina because canine semen's PH is closer to a vagina's PH than human semen's PH.

Strictly from an objective scientific view... there may be contraceptive "effects" of k9 semen in a woman's uterus... but it's 100% not a PH reason or that "semen pops the egg and deflates it" (Seriously where the fuck did that idea come from?)
 
... oh... so you're one of those Flat-Earth-Deniers... ;) hahahaha
Kidding obviously.



A human vagina has a PH of 3.5-4. Human semen is 7.2-8.0. Canine being 6.4-6.8. This means that as far as "affecting" the PH of a human vagina... canine semen will have LESS of an affect than human semen on changing the PH of a vagina because canine semen's PH is closer to a vagina's PH than human semen's PH.

Strictly from an objective scientific view... there may be contraceptive "effects" of k9 semen in a woman's uterus... but it's 100% not a PH reason or that "semen pops the egg and deflates it" (Seriously where the fuck did that idea come from?)
Oh hey I think it was your thread I was referencing before! Thanks a bunch for your work sorting fact from fiction.
 
explain why
The ZP glycoproteins in humans and canines are different. According to research, ZP2 is the primary contributor to oocyte capture in Humans. Research seems to indicate that in in Canines, ZP3 may be the primary contributor.

There is no proof to back up your claims. Just because you have noticed a coorelation between two things does not mean that there is a causation between them.
 
... oh... so you're one of those Flat-Earth-Deniers... ;) hahahaha
Kidding obviously.



A human vagina has a PH of 3.5-4. Human semen is 7.2-8.0. Canine being 6.4-6.8. This means that as far as "affecting" the PH of a human vagina... canine semen will have LESS of an affect than human semen on changing the PH of a vagina because canine semen's PH is closer to a vagina's PH than human semen's PH.

Strictly from an objective scientific view... there may be contraceptive "effects" of k9 semen in a woman's uterus... but it's 100% not a PH reason or that "semen pops the egg and deflates it" (Seriously where the fuck did that idea come from?)
No idea where they got the idea that it deflate the egg lol.

Also yeah I am quite aware the PH of the vagina is actually pretty low making it hostile to sperm. there is a "pronounced pH gradient in the female genital tract. In nonpregnant women with NVM, the median pH was 3.9 in the lower vagina, 5.7 in the upper vagina, and not less than 7.7 in the upper uterine cavity."

I was thinking specifically in the uterus.

And like I told OP... A FWB who was having unprotected dog and human sex frequently got pregnant regardless of being frequently pumped full of dog semen.
 
Yeah, people have this idea the sperm just jams on through like an arrow going into flesh. Doesn't really work that way!

The only thing I could see impacting anything is if the environment was flooded with a lot of dog semen, which makes the environment mildly more acidic. But that's not really going to be reliable. I literally had a FWB who ended up getting pregnant even while being flooded with doggy spunk every other day.
ok thank you thats a better on point response ---- but did she sleep with a man right after the dog or was there spaces between her time with the dog and her sleeping with the man?
 
Oh? Please do link your source.
I need to remember what was the google search wording that I used that i found it

but for the sake argument I think we can talk about if big amount of dog sperm in women vagina before sex with a man can lower human semen productivity i think it something that can have merit into it slowing down the human sperm or even preventing strong sperms reaching the eggs
 
"I'm pretty sure I read it somewhere" is leagues away from "we know for a fact", I read somewhere the earth was flat and that's obviously false.
I am not talking about readin it in amatuer forum or something like that - and because i cant remember which wording i used on google to find it i just retracted the statement

Don't pretend you know things for a fact when you really don't and people who believe you could end up with extremely unwanted results if they follow your advice.
thats what you are doing now as well --- i read the thread from the begining, calling a guy "a dreamer" or being rude to him is not explaining things
 
Strictly from an objective scientific view... there may be contraceptive "effects" of k9 semen in a woman's uterus... but it's 100% not a PH reason or that "semen pops the egg and deflates it" (Seriously where the fuck did that idea come from?)
it wasnt that the semen enter the egg and "pops" it and unfortunatly thats why just being rude to people who even say stupid stuff does not help the conversation

the thought is that the sperm might start a process on the human egg which because of too different DNA would cause failure


would love if you expand your thoughts about how it is possible to be a conrtaceptive as you stated
 
"pronounced pH gradient in the female genital tract. In nonpregnant women with NVM, the median pH was 3.9 in the lower vagina, 5.7 in the upper vagina, and not less than 7.7 in the upper uterine cavity."
I read that study last year and we discussed that exact study in one of my classes on conducting quality research.
The ph does change somewhat throughout the tract, but the problem is that they didn't properly control their subjects to really be able to rely on that study.

First, they only enrolled 26 women. That's a very low sample size. Worse than that, only 6 were considered "non-pregnant" but if you read further, those women had laparoscopic sterilization... ie their tubes tied.
Second, while they did screen for women who were actively menstruating, they did not otherwise control for where she was in her cycle.
Thirdly, they did not control for use of different feminine sanitary products when these women had their last period.

There are too many non controlled issues in that study that lead to the conclusions unreliable... for healthy non-pregnant women with a fully functional reproductive tracts.
Hell... they didn't even have a single healthy non-pregnant woman with a fully functional reproductive tract in the study.
 
The ZP glycoproteins in humans and canines are different. According to research, ZP2 is the primary contributor to oocyte capture in Humans. Research seems to indicate that in in Canines, ZP3 may be the primary contributor.

There is no proof to back up your claims. Just because you have noticed a coorelation between two things does not mean that there is a causation between them.
I didnt observe anything or never said that I did

so what you are saying is that dog semen has ZP3 it doesnt trigger any process on the Egg because the receptors of the egg dont recognize the semen due to it being ZP3
 
And like I told OP... A FWB who was having unprotected dog and human sex frequently got pregnant regardless of being frequently pumped full of dog semen.
one case does not disprove --- there are people who get pregnant although using regular Birthcontrol
 
would love if you expand your thoughts about how it is possible to be a conrtaceptive as you stated
I have a whole thread on what is known. As for extending that research into contraceptive effects, I dont think I have the desire to do that considering the other things on my research radar in the near future. Research takes a lot of time and effort, so I'm only looking into things that appeal directly to me.
Now if you want to fund some research... then we can talk. :ROFLMAO:
 
I have a whole thread on what is known. As for extending that research into contraceptive effects, I dont think I have the desire to do that considering the other things on my research radar in the near future. Research takes a lot of time and effort, so I'm only looking into things that appeal directly to me.
Now if you want to fund some research... then we can talk. :ROFLMAO:
I dont expect you to go to your professors and tell them " i want to research if alot of dog semen can be used as birthcontrol if put big amounts inside of womans vagina" unless they are some kinky professors offcourse but i do wonder to hear your thought about how big amount of k9 sperm in the vagina can prevent pregnancy and how likly it is to do it
 
Correlation is not causation.

I really wish the site would immediately smash any and all of these dipshit threads that pop up outside the fantasy section.

I do admit that the concept that other dipshits who read and believe all this shit may find themselves in a situation they believe to be impossible would be highly entertaining.
 
I really wish the site would immediately smash any and all of these dipshit threads that pop up outside the fantasy section.
If only.

But nowadays, "You're an idiot, stop making up "science" about things you don't understand the basics of" is apparently an inappropriate response.
So sad.
 
one case does not disprove --- there are people who get pregnant although using regular Birthcontrol
The problem with your logic is that the burden of proof is on you. You are recommending a form of birth control to people, failure of which will irrevocably change their lives. That means you better be damn sure what you're saying is true. You better have undeniable proof right in front of you that it's true. You don't. You have a maybe paper you think you remember but can't find anymore. Recommending this form of birth control based on that is recklessly negligent, and could deal tremendous harm to anyone foolish enough to take this for a proven fact.
 
If only.

But nowadays, "You're an idiot, stop making up "science" about things you don't understand the basics of" is apparently an inappropriate response.
So sad.
IKR?

Just goes to prove people don't want the truth, they want to believe their delusions are truth. And that about sums up the rank and file of humanity.
 
The problem with your logic is that the burden of proof is on you. You are recommending a form of birth control to people, failure of which will irrevocably change their lives. That means you better be damn sure what you're saying is true. You better have undeniable proof right in front of you that it's true. You don't. You have a maybe paper you think you remember but can't find anymore. Recommending this form of birth control based on that is recklessly negligent, and could deal tremendous harm to anyone foolish enough to take this for a proven fact.
Yeah for sure... While my experience may not be a scientifically set out or peer reviewed... etc. It should give you some pause when a member on this board tells you that their partner got pregnant while taking a dog on a daily/every other day basis. (really it was 2 dogs, but who's keeping track?) xD
 
I see we have another cervix type thread here.
Add it to the list of bullshit:
1. Dogs specifically evolved for women to have sex with.
2. The penis penetrates the cervix.
3. Pigs cum so much directly in the womb that it visibly bloats a woman up.
4. Canine cum is a contraceptive.
Fascinating.
 
I read that study last year and we discussed that exact study in one of my classes on conducting quality research.
The ph does change somewhat throughout the tract, but the problem is that they didn't properly control their subjects to really be able to rely on that study.

First, they only enrolled 26 women. That's a very low sample size. Worse than that, only 6 were considered "non-pregnant" but if you read further, those women had laparoscopic sterilization... ie their tubes tied.
Second, while they did screen for women who were actively menstruating, they did not otherwise control for where she was in her cycle.
Thirdly, they did not control for use of different feminine sanitary products when these women had their last period.

There are too many non controlled issues in that study that lead to the conclusions unreliable... for healthy non-pregnant women with a fully functional reproductive tracts.
Hell... they didn't even have a single healthy non-pregnant woman with a fully functional reproductive tract in the study.

Oh yeah, I will totally admit I did 0 more investigation into the topic that the document you are referencing. Presumably https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ar...ated a pronounced,in the upper uterine cavity. ? I had heard before that there were some PH differences between the vagina and uterus but that would have probably been from a class long ago.

Wasn't aware of your points on the study. You would think the study would be done on 18-25 year olds with acceptable weights/health, rule out things like diabetes, and ideally limit for any kind of change outside of what is natural biology, be that medications, sanitary products, or hormone altering surgery.
 
Oh yeah, I will totally admit I did 0 more investigation into the topic that the document you are referencing. Presumably https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ar...ated a pronounced,in the upper uterine cavity. ?

Yup, that's the one.

You would think the study would be done on 18-25 year olds with acceptable weights/health, rule out things like diabetes, and ideally limit for any kind of change outside of what is natural biology, be that medications, sanitary products, or hormone altering surgery.
I hope someone does a study like that. When you actually dig into the literature on certain topics it's kinda shocking just how many gaping holes there are. Sometimes you can find studies here or there in those gaps, but they're usually not well done or are so narrowly defined that they don't really fill in much knowledge. Very narrow studies are actually very good, but sadly they bring about more questions than answers they resolve. lol I'd guess that probably a third of the time I spend doing research on things is spend just on vetting the papers I'm reading and making sure they're reliable enough to draw conclusions from.
 
Back
Top