• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Do you stop being zoo exclusive if you let a human use your sexualy?

Zetaman40 said:
If you willingly let a human have sex with you on a regular basis, there has to be an attraction between you two to a point
Click to expand...
Not always, I do let a single human bone me often, I have zero physical or romantic attraction for him. I let him use me and I'm with him because he is inlove with me and I love him as a friend, If I where to reject him, that would hurt him and I don't want to hurt him. I try to be a good friend to my friends and if a friend wants me to be his husband and be his sex partner, I got no problems with it. To me sex with a human is like giving a hand shake to a human, the other human may enjoy the handshakle but I do not enjoy it, but doesn't mean I can't give handshakes. And depending of the circumstances, I have to give a handshake.

Why have a double standard for only zoophiles? If a zooexclusive is not longer one if he lets a human use him sexually. Does that means a heterosexual in a male prison is no longer a heterosexual exclusive if he gets used by other heterosexuals who want sex but the only think avaliable are butt holes? PLnety heterosexuals do gay sex, not because they like it, some times are forced, some times they want to be nice, some times they hae no options, some times they work in gay porn to make a buck. To me they don't stop being heterosexual exclusives. Because thsoe gay acts are not done out of homosexuality. Me doing human sex stuff (I'm the pasive by the way, I can't climax with a human) does not make me gay, I'm 100% zoosexual exclusive. I still have my rottweiler wife.
 
Aluzky said:
Does a gay stop being gay if he lets a woman use him?
Does a heterosexual stop being heterosexual if he works on a gay porno?
Does a zoosexual exclusive stop being a zoosexual exclusive if he willingly lets a human use him sexually?

A immature person said to me: Zoo Exclusive means only animals. Should be easy to understand with your 135 IQ. You are not at all into humans and let another man fuck you. I think there is something seriously seriously wrong with you but I already knew that before you said that.

So, what is wrong with wanting a friend to be happy? What is wrong with letting human use you sexually? I explain my situation a bit better in here. → https://www.zooville.org/threads/bestiality-vs-human-sex.770/page-3

I'm sure I'm not the only zoosexual exclusive who is in a human relationship nor the last one.

I can only climax with dogs, I only fall inlove with dogs. I still have my canine wife next to me. I can't climax with humans, I can't love humans like I love my canine wife or my past canine husband. I can't get any more zoosexual exclusive than that. If I let a human fuck me to make that human happy, my exclusive zoosexual orientation does not change, I'm still only attracted to dogs, I still only love dogs. Right?

Feel free to state your opinions.

What you think about heteros who work in gay porn or gays that work in heterosexual porn? Do they also stop being gay or hetero because of the sexual acts that they do at work? What if a lesbian gets raped by a heterosexual? Is she no longer a lesbian? What about 2 married lesbians that wanted to make a baby for them as a family and one of them let a dude donate sperm in the old way (though heterosexual sex) is she no longer a lesbian?
Click to expand...


Well said.
 
Aluzky said:
Would be boring if nobody had them. ;)
Click to expand...
That is true and I am all for it. I guess just lately I have seen a lot of debates over how do you classify this or what do you call that and then splitting hairs over wording and definitions…I think everyone needs to do what they way to do and to enjoy it and not necessarily worry about labels
 
I'm a zoo that loves to have sex with women.

I find sex with other girls to be incredibly fun, thrilling and a blast. However I am absolutely satisfied on a whole, deeper level when I am tied to my mate and he's breeding me. It's a completely different, more fulfilling experience that I can't properly put into words, but others who are like me know this as well.

Sex with human girls is fun, I'm a zoo because mating with Max feels right.

Also who gives flying fuck when you got a fucking massive dog cock buried inside of you?
 
Labels are just labels plus we change throughout our lives. Accept this fact that there is no true exclusive except the choices we make to ourselves.
 
Reconscope said:
Labels are just labels plus we change throughout our lives. Accept this fact that there is no true exclusive except the choices we make to ourselves.
Click to expand...
We change throughout our lives..? I've lived a while and I've never woke up and thought I'm gonna stop being zoo (which I don't even think would be possible anyways because it's been a lifelong orientation) and fuck all the ladies and men I can before I kick the bucket. Lol but you have a point. I shouldn't argue this. To each their own I guess
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Zetaman40 said:
We change throughout our lives..? I've lived a while and I've never woke up and thought I'm gonna stop being zoo and fuck all the ladies and men I can before I kick the bucket. Lol but you have a point. I shouldn't argue this. To each their own I guess
Click to expand...
Thanks for understanding
 
Zetaman40 said:
I have zero desire in ANY circumstance to have sex with a human.
Click to expand...
I do wonder: If some one offered you 100 million dollars if you let him fuck you in the ass, you would not do it? If you were to let it happen in exchange for money, would you not consider yourself zoo exclusive any more?
 
To me, zoo exclusive is just as it reads: only into animals. If you let a human "use you sexually", then how could one call themselves "exclusive"? It's like saying I eat only vanilla ice cream... oh, but sometimes I DO eat chocolate. It's like having your cake and eating it too. You could, however, say that you're predominantly zoo but dabble into human activities occasionally. Me, personally, am currently a zoo exclusive since I haven't had a significant other in about 15 years. If I were to hook up with a woman, the former would apply.

This is just my opinion, however. Other folks might see it differently.
 
For me, sexuality is more of a spectrum. I have gone back and forth with being bi and Hetero and I am active with my German Shepard although I have gone for periods with no zoo interaction.

I oscillate around and am drawn to certain people or I suppose animals for reasons I cannot understand. Sexual contact is always the icing on the cake for having a relationship or a companion. It’s creating a meaningful bond with someone you like and I like that part, whether it is man or beast!
 
A zoo exclusive is a type of zoophile who is only sexually and romantically attracted to animals. But many have human friendships and affinity with other zoos.

A true zoo exclusive finds it impossible to be sexually attracted to a human.
 
Aluzky said:
I do wonder: If some one offered you 100 million dollars if you let him fuck you in the ass, you would not do it? If you were to let it happen in exchange for money, would you not consider yourself zoo exclusive any more?
Click to expand...
If I let a doctor stick his finger in my butt to perform a prostate exam, does that make me gay or no longer zoo exclusive? No, that's ridiculous. Similarly, if you let somebody fuck you in the ass solely because you want $100,000,000 and not because the thought or act arouses you sexually it doesn't "make" you anything...except a prostitute. Your sexuality is about attraction.
 
Aluzky said:
I do wonder: If some one offered you 100 million dollars if you let him fuck you in the ass, you would not do it? If you were to let it happen in exchange for money, would you not consider yourself zoo exclusive any more?
Click to expand...
I'd consider myself rich.
 
Zetaman40 said:
Nope. Money isn't worth the potential risk of getting AIDS :gsd_laughing:

If someone was willing to pay that much money for my asshole that means they are desperate ?

I wouldn't let it happen. But like I said earlier I'm just different than you in that right: I don't want humans that way, regardless of the circumstances and that's not a big deal. We are all are different, and that's fine. The world would be a pretty boring place if everyone was founded upon exact sameness. Sorry if my responses sounded rude. I wasn't trying to be....
Click to expand...
Yeah, I'm not into humans either, but you don't have to find a man sexually attractive to get poked in the butt. $100 million is a lot to turn down over momentary discomfort!
 
Octavian said:
Yeah, I'm not into humans either, but you don't have to find a man sexually attractive to get poked in the butt. $100 million is a lot to turn down over momentary discomfort!
Click to expand...
It's not so much discomfort :gsd_laughing: because I've taken pretty large knots up my ass on many occasions. Let's just say I'm far from a virgin when it comes to anal. I just don't want a humans dick inside of me. ? No amount of money is enough to change that. I won't be bribed into even a brief moment of "normality" :gsd_wink::gsd_laughing:
 
Zetaman40 said:
No amount of money is enough to change that. I won't be bribed into even a brief moment of "normality"
Click to expand...
That's one hell of a conviction, I've got to say. Personally I'd accept the bribe and then spend the rest of my life sailing the globe on my yacht with a pack of gorgeous bitches. Bestiality is legal in international waters if you fly the right flag. :sneaky:
 
This. Is a train wreck. And you obviously have some issues. Please get some therapy. A lot of what ur saying here is alarming.

Also. Does your "boyfriend" know you have no love for him bc as someone who's been in that situation and has lead to the worst depression of my life. Please just tell him you don't actually care about him and break up w him bc what ur doing is worse then cheating.
 
Kristhezombie666 said:
This. Is a train wreck. And you obviously have some issues. Please get some therapy. A lot of what ur saying here is alarming.

Also. Does your "boyfriend" know you have no love for him bc as someone who's been in that situation and has lead to the worst depression of my life. Please just tell him you don't actually care about him and break up w him bc what ur doing is worse then cheating.
Click to expand...
Right my sentiment exactly. That's why I stopped trying to argue anything with him because the point is mute. I mean look at this guys posts. There's a few where he's on here calling people "pedophobes" because they have a sense of morale. That's where I draw the fucking line. Animals are sexually mature and capable of doing sexual things. Bestiality rarely ever results in harm to a animal, whether physical or mental (I say rarely because there are zoosadistic individuals out there) There's no comparison between a zoosexuals relationship with animals and what a fucking predator does. A predator forces themselves on a kid: bribes or threatens them to participate, it mentally scars them and may even physically harm them. Trying to stick up for some shit like that is entirely fucked right up. Pedophilia WILL NEVER be accepted even by a hated minority of people who like to let their dog mount them.
 
This is kind of intriguing to think about. I mean technically in a sense yes, since it's not an animal, but at the same time, whether someone drops being gay if they fuck a woman or something similar like that, could also be argued
 
I think you could still be zoo exclusive as far as your sexual interests go. I can understand having sex with someone performatively to please them. Sorry people are upsetting you :(
 
Aluzky said:
Does a gay stop being gay if he lets a woman use him?
Does a heterosexual stop being heterosexual if he works on a gay porno?
Does a zoosexual exclusive stop being a zoosexual exclusive if he willingly lets a human use him sexually?

A immature person said to me: Zoo Exclusive means only animals. Should be easy to understand with your 135 IQ. You are not at all into humans and let another man fuck you. I think there is something seriously seriously wrong with you but I already knew that before you said that.

So, what is wrong with wanting a friend to be happy? What is wrong with letting human use you sexually? I explain my situation a bit better in here. → https://www.zooville.org/threads/bestiality-vs-human-sex.770/page-3

I'm sure I'm not the only zoosexual exclusive who is in a human relationship nor the last one.

I can only climax with dogs, I only fall inlove with dogs. I still have my canine wife next to me. I can't climax with humans, I can't love humans like I love my canine wife or my past canine husband. I can't get any more zoosexual exclusive than that. If I let a human fuck me to make that human happy, my exclusive zoosexual orientation does not change, I'm still only attracted to dogs, I still only love dogs. Right?

Feel free to state your opinions.

What you think about heteros who work in gay porn or gays that work in heterosexual porn? Do they also stop being gay or hetero because of the sexual acts that they do at work? What if a lesbian gets raped by a heterosexual? Is she no longer a lesbian? What about 2 married lesbians that wanted to make a baby for them as a family and one of them let a dude donate sperm in the old way (though heterosexual sex) is she no longer a lesbian?
Click to expand...
I think younger people tend to label too many things. It just creates confusion or sides of the line. Your sexuality isn’t your complete persona. So that said said unless a person is still hung up on traditional Christian values at their core. Or subconscious Sexual partners or types or sexual partners should be irrelevant to a persons full being. Zoo exclusive in reality is just another label. It’s not a badge of honor. My opinion.
 
Hackamore said:
I think younger people tend to label too many things. It just creates confusion or sides of the line. Your sexuality isn’t your complete persona. So that said said unless a person is still hung up on traditional Christian values at their core. Or subconscious Sexual partners or types or sexual partners should be irrelevant to a persons full being. Zoo exclusive in reality is just another label. It’s not a badge of honor. My opinion.
Click to expand...
I feel the same way. It's good to use labels to figure yourself out, but don't let labels define yourself.
 
The question could be worded a little better but my opinion is yes if a zoo exclusive has sex with a human they can still be zoo exclusive. I'm only interested in k9's and have never been interested in humans in any way. Recently and unexpectedly someone has come into my life that has changed that but I don't think that changes my zoo exclusivity, because I'm only attracted to this one person. I'm not suddenly attracted to humans now, still just doggies. This person is just that special to me. The attraction, love and connection I feel for this person is greater than the way I have felt about some of my doggie partners. I'm new to this human love stuff but I'm lucky and grateful to have a understanding, loving, caring partner that is willing to put up with my odd ass. I never thought I could be in love with, attracted to, or trust a person like I do dogs but I guess there is someone for everyone, even us zooz.

This is just my opinion from personal experiences. I understand everyone is different and I love reading about all the differences amongst us zoos
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top