cathead_biscuits
Tourist
I am wondering…
In a quest to be the very best I can be! I have to ask. It have came to me that maybe dogs and un-cut men have a similar advantages that make sex potentially more pleasurable.
If you watch a dog go to town. He kind of never un-inserts himself (on propose at least) and has a short hump compared to normal sex. Fully inserted kind of pulsing motion.
Uncut men in studies have a similar effect. The skin slightly moves in a way that allows the shaft to move but the skin to stay in place. Allowing for less of a stabbing motion and more of a pulsing motion.
For my female zoo counterparts out there is the male dog analogy correct!? For those of you who prefer beast to man am I on the right tract? I only ask so I can better my own motions.
Thank you.
In a quest to be the very best I can be! I have to ask. It have came to me that maybe dogs and un-cut men have a similar advantages that make sex potentially more pleasurable.
If you watch a dog go to town. He kind of never un-inserts himself (on propose at least) and has a short hump compared to normal sex. Fully inserted kind of pulsing motion.
Uncut men in studies have a similar effect. The skin slightly moves in a way that allows the shaft to move but the skin to stay in place. Allowing for less of a stabbing motion and more of a pulsing motion.
For my female zoo counterparts out there is the male dog analogy correct!? For those of you who prefer beast to man am I on the right tract? I only ask so I can better my own motions.
Thank you.