MoreBeastThanMan
Tourist
1¹1278
M
MrsShemon
Guest
111279
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
111280
Oh, I saw that one - but I am not attracted to epileptic episode inducing color schemes.
Nothing against that uni-horn without a corn, if it keeps in natural colors interest is given. Even if not canine but equine. ?
She's a princess, so... you have to look the part ?
Oh, I saw that one - but I am not attracted to epileptic episode inducing color schemes.
Nothing against that uni-horn without a corn, if it keeps in natural colors interest is given. Even if not canine but equine. ?
M
MrsShemon
Guest
111281
Still not gay when a male is attracted to a female or when a female looks like a female.
With that said, there is absolutely nothing wrong with being gay.
Still not gay when a male is attracted to a female or when a female looks like a female.
With that said, there is absolutely nothing wrong with being gay.
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
111282
It's sarcasm, no worries.
As I don't "love" just a pussy, no matter on which animal, but the animals them self including all aspects, and as well don't own or meet animals "for a pussy", but because they're loved animals and deserve a hug, a good meal, some cuddling and chilling - the appearance matters to me more than just "it's a pussy!".
After all I've got a "pussy" laying around in my direct near, but I don't think about that "pussy" all the day, but only if we are both in the mood for some erotic time together.
People often don't get this concept of living without any sexual stress or necessities building up. And I don't get the reason why humans seem such easily controlled by their sexual urges. They should be the ones to control and regulate any urges, not inverted.
To be honest: I actually don't feel well in the near of humans which can't control their sexual urges. It resembles a lost cause of not-existent self control, of "being always a danger" for them self and others. But I learned that they seem to be the absolute majority, for what ever reason exists.
It's sarcasm, no worries.
As I don't "love" just a pussy, no matter on which animal, but the animals them self including all aspects, and as well don't own or meet animals "for a pussy", but because they're loved animals and deserve a hug, a good meal, some cuddling and chilling - the appearance matters to me more than just "it's a pussy!".
After all I've got a "pussy" laying around in my direct near, but I don't think about that "pussy" all the day, but only if we are both in the mood for some erotic time together.
People often don't get this concept of living without any sexual stress or necessities building up. And I don't get the reason why humans seem such easily controlled by their sexual urges. They should be the ones to control and regulate any urges, not inverted.
To be honest: I actually don't feel well in the near of humans which can't control their sexual urges. It resembles a lost cause of not-existent self control, of "being always a danger" for them self and others. But I learned that they seem to be the absolute majority, for what ever reason exists.
M
MrsShemon
Guest
111285
110286
?
?
M
MrsShemon
Guest
111287
? ?
? ?
Last edited by a moderator:
111288
?
?
M
MrsShemon
Guest
111289
Feeding time.
Feeding time.
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
M
MrsShemon
Guest
111291
That would be dogs.
111292
Pupper fooooders!
Pupper fooooders!
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
111293
Mine plus the (nowadays) two I often care for are basically wireless vacuum cleaners in terms of my own "grab a snack" activities.
No matter when, they'll try to vacuum any amount I share. Unfortunately they're a broken technology in terms of removal of their own fur hairs. ?
Dogs, cool!
No matter when, they'll try to vacuum any amount I share. Unfortunately they're a broken technology in terms of removal of their own fur hairs. ?
M
MrsShemon
Guest
111294
But I do have robots that clean (sadly they don't work well with copious amounts of canine hair)
That would be heaven if they could clean up after themselves.Dogs, cool!Mine plus the (nowadays) two I often care for are basically wireless vacuum cleaners in terms of my own "grab a snack" activities.
No matter when, they'll try to vacuum any amount I share. Unfortunately they're a broken technology in terms of removal of their own fur hairs. ?
But I do have robots that clean (sadly they don't work well with copious amounts of canine hair)
Taopony
Citizen of Zooville
M
MrsShemon
Guest
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
111297
I am actually building a "quick cleaning" solution for loose hairs in the rooms which have foldable / lowering tables, shelves, furniture or just covers to stop hairs from flying onto the surfaces.
It's my land (one is, the other is rented and a few miles away, but both buildings and installations are my own) and as such everything is possible for a "grey area" legally constructing scientist.
One of the solutions is based on: lower / fold / cover all things, then start a 1200 watt air blower with around 100 cm diameter (that's roughly 39 inches). It works well and blows out all hairs to the front entrance into the garden. But the problem with it is that the sheer amount covers everything outside: plants, flowers, trees, tools, stairs, roofs, everything. I found hairs in the well water pump installation afterwards. ?
As such I am refining it nowadays by using a fly net on the door which is hung over four corner screws and after the wind tunnel was active for 20 seconds I just put the four corners together and have all hairs catched in the net.
Then it is easily disposable. But the installation and even just power of this air stream is enough to almost instantly tear through plastic nets. Now I am experimenting with a stainless steel net, which is still flexible to some degree but not prone to tearing.
Crazy scientist strikes again, y'see. ?
Functionality is a must.
Yep, absolutely true.
I am actually building a "quick cleaning" solution for loose hairs in the rooms which have foldable / lowering tables, shelves, furniture or just covers to stop hairs from flying onto the surfaces.
It's my land (one is, the other is rented and a few miles away, but both buildings and installations are my own) and as such everything is possible for a "grey area" legally constructing scientist.
One of the solutions is based on: lower / fold / cover all things, then start a 1200 watt air blower with around 100 cm diameter (that's roughly 39 inches). It works well and blows out all hairs to the front entrance into the garden. But the problem with it is that the sheer amount covers everything outside: plants, flowers, trees, tools, stairs, roofs, everything. I found hairs in the well water pump installation afterwards. ?
As such I am refining it nowadays by using a fly net on the door which is hung over four corner screws and after the wind tunnel was active for 20 seconds I just put the four corners together and have all hairs catched in the net.
Then it is easily disposable. But the installation and even just power of this air stream is enough to almost instantly tear through plastic nets. Now I am experimenting with a stainless steel net, which is still flexible to some degree but not prone to tearing.
Crazy scientist strikes again, y'see. ?
Functionality is a must.
M
MrsShemon
Guest
111298
I am much more old school. Standard vacuum cleaner and off I go, without the French maid outfit.
Taopony
Citizen of Zooville
111300
Someone finally helping me behind my back instead of making the gay jokes while I'm gone. Weird right? ?
Someone finally helping me behind my back instead of making the gay jokes while I'm gone. Weird right? ?
YanchaOkami
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
111302
That's absolutely fine - mostly I do this as well, but sometimes there's basically tumbleweed-ical amounts of Husky hairs.
As such new solutions are always an idea.
That's absolutely fine - mostly I do this as well, but sometimes there's basically tumbleweed-ical amounts of Husky hairs.
As such new solutions are always an idea.
Taopony
Citizen of Zooville
111304
Ah, in that case...
Disclaimer: The Fox is as straight as an arrow. Any joke we make about his being gay is purely fictional.
111305
111306
I thought forsure you'd turn that around on me because of how I said it. But it's not gonna get you kisses!
M
MrsShemon
Guest
111307
I will just kiss myself then
*Bends deep ??
I will just kiss myself then
*Bends deep ??