• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Bred by a monkey?!

It is an interesting question, but what i think from my "weird" commonsense is that since we're all around here, why wouldn't be any human around that actually coupled with one of those monkes ? and no pregnancies indeed, it'd be many hybrids around since there's a lot of sex around, lol
 
Depressed and bad dressed said:
that's also true ?
Click to expand...

That's the usual argument i use when the classic "human-hybrid" topic brings up at some conversation with friends. Not to talk about anything pro-zoo, but to tell that there's people out there that'll do it, and most of my friends accept that this isn't anything new to the humankind so... it'd be pretty much rare if there's so much animal sex around and no offspring is out.

Still the comments during such conversations are gold lol, many friends have no idea of that i actually know more than they think about this topic
 
Depressed and bad dressed said:
Hi! I apologize if it's the wrong section, but I didn't know where to post this silly question.

Anyway, I saw a meme the other day talking about donkeys and horses having like 80% compatible genomes, thus being able to generate an interspecies offspring, which is the mule, while humans and monkey have a 95% compatibility, but none talking about interspecies breeding.

Do you think it's be possible for a female monkey to be fertilized by a human male and give birth to whatever creature it'd be? Or a female human with a male monkey... doesn't change much I think ?

It'd be interesting to see how a crossbreed would be, but I doubt any govt is okay with this ahah. Unless... they secretly did already? DUN DUN DUN DUUUN

lmao sorry for this question, can't sleep ?
Click to expand...
I reckon they could but maybe I just want to believe
 
Gorilla's take under a few or couple of minutes to ejaculate and their penises are quite small.... not sure a woman would get much pleasure out of it. :gsd_laughing:
 
Reality check: you cannot pack ten pounds of mud in a five pound sack....all of the great apes are stronger by magnitudes. Male apes are kot hung large...an inch to an inch and a half.. with those balls, snd she-apes having no buttocks to speak of, its all that is needed. AND try sticking a human sized object in a Chimp, Gorilla or Orang girlie...if your head doesnt part company from your neck, she wasnt trying. You all should be using the search engine instead of creating new threads... look up a chimp named travis and why the neighbor lady hasnt got her Real Face anymore
 
Goattobeloved said:
No chimps, but according to wikipedia extract there are some ape lab test about attraction and attachement.

Humanzee - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org
Spoiler: Mostly no good news for you, people ?
If someone has access to the complete documents in note [14]

Bedford JM (August 1977). "Sperm/egg interaction: the specificity of human spermatozoa". Anat. Rec. 188 (4): 477–87. doi:10.1002/ar.1091880407. PMID 409311. S2CID 19052254.

  Anyway, I wanted to comment on Oliver.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_(chimpanzee)
An "ugly chimp" in performance that was marketed as human x chimp (No, he was not).
Thing is, at the time there was a fair number of women sending letters with interest in... um... doing scientific research on his fertility
Click to expand...
Do you have copies of those letters or screenshots?
 
Texasmonkeyboy_210 said:
Do you have copies of those letters or screenshots?
Click to expand...
That particular paper can be had as a PDF file (if you're willing to spend $42 + tax to get it) from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com - Which is absolutely ridiculous.

Fortunately, there's a better (and no-cost) way - read on...

For research papers that carry a "doi:<some random-looking numbers/letters that appear to be real similar to a URL, and sometimes actually ARE a valid URL>" tag (As nearly every published research paper does - The paper mentioned is one of them - its DOI info is https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091880407, and I'm currently looking at a full-text PDF file of it in another window - at no cost - wanna know how? Keep reading!) you can easily grab a copy of *MOST* of them, regardless of whether or not they're stashed behind a paywall (FAR too many are, but that's another pet-peeve/rant of mine that's much more suited to the dumpster due to the number and flammability of "naughty words" I'd need to use to accurately express my disgust at the concept) by keying sci-hub.se into your browser.

Once Sci-hub opens (You'll know by the "raven with a key in its beak" logo) put the DOI info - such as that exact link I noted above - into the box that you'll see on the left, and punch the "open" button to make it happen. From there, you can either read it online, or download it as a PDF file at no charge, though they seem to have added a captcha-type thing to the "download PDF function" in the past couple of days - must've been hit by bots mass-harvesting papers, I suppose.

Out of 50+ papers I've tried to access recently while working on a project, I've been able to access all but 3 of the ones I wanted to see - Even some really esoteric stuff that dates clear back into the mid-50s, or was published in Russia, China, or Korea, can be had - if you can find out the DOI info for it.

Finding the DOI for a given paper can be a bit problematic - The older the paper, the less likely the DOI info for it will be included in footnotes, but it's nearly impossible to find a research paper that doesn't have a bizarrely wordy title that's pretty close to fingerprint-grade unique. If that's the case for you, Google/bing/DDG/etc the *FULL EXACT TEXT OF THE TITLE AS SHOWN IN THE FOOTNOTE* and you'll more than likely find yourself looking at a list of journal publishers with paywalls offering to let you look at it - for a (usually insanely high) price. In every case I've tried so far, the offer to sell you access to a paper has included the DOI info for the paper in question. Copy the DOI info, head over to sci-hub.se, paste it in the "enter your reference" box, hit the "open" button, and in MOST cases, "Bob's yer uncle". I don't know how often they "scrape" for new papers, but if they haven't got the one you asked for, they'll say so, and I've found that often (but not every time) repeating the "search for the title/grab DOI info/paste into Sci-hub" process will bring it up on sci-hub when you make a second attempt - It almost feels like - and this might easily be the case - if they get a request for a paper they don't have on hand, it triggers a "go out and find a copy of the requested paper" routine, so that the second attempt USUALLY (but not always) succeeds.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top