Banned Websites

OffgridK9lover said:
4posts and was trying to whore out links to off site torrent sites, that was just in here, never mind what ells they may have posted ells where, then flexed their smooth brain when called out on an error
Click to expand...
Replies must have been deleted then. Only thing I see is him slinging a few insults in response to some insults. Crass, but not ban worthy.

Flexing stupidity isn't a bannable offense. Half this forum would be banned lol
 
Gregory said:
Replies must have been deleted then. Only thing I see is him slinging a few insults in response to some insults. Crass, but not ban worthy.

Flexing stupidity isn't a bannable offense. Half this forum would be banned lol
Click to expand...
Regardless I don't personally care for the insults, but the posting links to random torrent sites should have been enough alone to permanently ban him.
 
Filo69 said:
Thank you. Xx


Pillar am very crazy. I once did that my phone couldn't work because police had blocked it. So i had to switch it off. And buy another..luckily my sim wasn't registered. And i was using mobile data and with That sim card i had never used it to call anyone. Down here it isn't allowed animal porn. And most sites aren't safe
Sorry though if i offended you asking for safe sites. ✌

@ElJopende16 ,yes they had tracked my phone but luckily they didnt know exact house. They knocked different houses to ask any one with a dog in the flats and also knocked My house and asked, i never had a dog,and showed my other phone.i mean they track anyone using animal porn thats why am very careful i survived once,you never know the second time i might not.. ✌
Click to expand...
What country do you live in for them to do that ?
 
The threat of CSAM on zoo sites makes the arbitrary banning of animal scat on this safer zoo site (AND the limited ability to link to scat off-site) more dangerous than simply allowing it here. Less harm in people being bothered by animal poop than having to potentially view dangerous websites for a fetish that is less dangerous than "normal" bestiality. Diseases? Common bestiality comes with those, plus additional risks.
 
pissyfart said:
The threat of CSAM on zoo sites makes the arbitrary banning of animal scat on this safer zoo site (AND the limited ability to link to scat off-site) more dangerous than simply allowing it here. Less harm in people being bothered by animal poop than having to potentially view dangerous websites for a fetish that is less dangerous than "normal" bestiality. Diseases? Common bestiality comes with those, plus additional risks.
Click to expand...
Go to other sites where you can view whatever you want. Stop derailing threads because you don't like the rules
 
dogluver101 said:
Go to other sites where you can view whatever you want. Stop derailing threads because you don't like the rules
Click to expand...
It's still on-topic to the thread, as it mentions the advantage of using zoovilleforum over alternative sites, and the risks of using them. It's a discussion about dangers posed by visiting alternative sites when visiting alternative sites may not even be necessary in the first place. Also, you're not a helpful moderator, as you don't provide links to not banned websites and instead get snarky with me (while also not even addressing the main point in my post). Staff can't even have a logical debate or reveal their intentions. At this rate, staff act more like automated responses than people.
 
pissyfart said:
It's still on-topic to the thread, as it mentions the advantage of using zoovilleforum over alternative sites, and the risks of using them. It's a discussion about dangers posed by visiting alternative sites. Also, you're not a helpful moderator, as you don't provide links to not banned websites and instead get snarky with me (while also not even addressing the main point in my post).
Click to expand...
There's almost no safe sites. Majority are technically ran by the same people. Just a different domain.
Heck, how about I run one?

I'm not into seeing scat in a sexy way. So I have nothing else to add for that. If you made a poll, I'm sure you'll see a lot more No's than yes.
Common bestiality comes with those, plus additional risks.
Click to expand...
Generally if you're with a stray animal or any other possibly obvious unhealthy animal.
 
dogluver101 said:
There's almost no safe sites. Majority are technically ran by the same people. Just a different domain.
Heck, how about I run one?

I'm not into seeing it in a sexy way. So I have nothing else to add for that. If you made a poll, I'm sure you'll see a lot more No's than yes.

Generally if you're with a stray animal or any other possibly obvious unhealthy animal.
Click to expand...
"I'm not into seeing it in a sexy way." You should've said that earlier. Knowing staff biases helps form an accurate image in my head. Also, diseases can still happen with domesticated animals I'm pretty sure. If they can't, then I'm sure the fetish mentioned can't contract many more diseases than the usual, but I'm not a veterinarian.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top