I hear people talk about dogs and horses all the time, and everyone agrees cats are sexy, but God I wanna fuck a cow. Cows are so fucking hot and I wanna fuck one so bad. Does anyone else agree? Or is this weird even by zoo norms? Would love to talk about cows and their sexy moos (especially if you have one and live in Australia...)
Hey OP my DMs are always open! To your question: from my experience there are two sides to this. First is genuine sexual preference. In my view (which is by no means expert) as long as your sexual partner meets various key criteria (most of which I am certain would be universally agreed on by reasonable zoos) then you are allowed to have a strong preference for animals of that type. It's very normal and healthy! Some criteria examples are (not exhaustive and not necessarily binding but just good general guidelines) they are a mammal, they are physically and emotionally capable of sexual intimacy both logistically and in terms of mutual pleasure and consent, clear communication, trust and love can be established and it is safe to have a sexual (if not ideally a romantic) relationship with them over time. So in this case horses tend to meet all the criteria with some challenges over safe relationships. Zebras, on the other hand, unfortunately do not typically meet the safe and ongoing relationship criteria except in very specific circumstances where a general rule doesn't apply. That doesn't mean having a preference for zebras over horses or dogs or cows is wrong or bad but just that it is harder to express in a safe and healthy way. The usual factors of partners who are too young or too small also violate the physical and emotional rule and are definitely unhealthy and unnatural. Other matters like reptiles or something are not my area of expertise but in the general sense you would need a unique perspective to make these suitable and safe and absent that I would personally find it concerning if I felt I needed that kind of sexual partner to fulfill my sexual identity. Cows, you can probably guess by this point, are perfectly reasonable to have a preference for as sexual partners.
One big reason so many like horses and dogs (in my view) is because socially we have some instinctive level of communication and connection that makes meeting the safe and natural criteria easier without exceptional circumstances. While this creates the issue of risk of misunderstanding because we do need to re-educate ourselves on some of those finer communication points (not all wagging tails mean a happy or playful dog for example) the entry point to seeing the sexual appeal of these potential partner preferences is the lowest of most potential animal partners.
The other factor is what I am calling the zoo mindset for lack of a better term. This means interest in particular animals as potential partners doesnt lock in a particular animal partner preference. It just means we have the mind of a genuine zoosexual. In my experiences I have found guys who have had real life experience to a certain level or frequency tend to be open to or aware of a possible sexual interest beyond a single partner preference even though perhaps their real life experiences are consistently with dogs or horses (for example). Guys who are exclusively in to dogs and have no interest in any other sex partner also (some exceptions, still talking generally) tend to be interested in just one sex act (being mounted or pounding cookie) rather than a relationship as a whole. That falls more towards fetish than sexuality. More genuine zoosexuals might have a very strong partner preference but at least intellectually understand that they have the capacity for intimacy with more than just one type of animal sex partner. Case in point: my earliest zoo fantasies were about cows and bulls. Perhaps the only reason I didn't end up with a sexual preference for bovines is because my first real life experience (and again this is a potential explanation for much of the interest) was with a dog.
So no. It is not weird in the slightest. Either you have that sexual preference, you have the open mind of a zoosexual or you have a sexual fetish for cows and not other animals. Or some combination of the three. All are normal to a certain point to have as fantasy and the more it fits with your sexual identity rather than just a sexual fetish the more working toward establishing a romantic or sexual relationship with a cow is reasonable and achievable. Not to say a fetishist can't also do the same just from my view it is less fraught and healthier for all involved if they keep it to fantasy.
My DMs are open to talk more about this if you want. Based in Australia too.
