ShanoirII
Tourist
Something that can really help with overcoming guilt is coming to the realization that anti-zoophiles are not really the types of people you should be taking moral guidance from.
If you prod most anti-zoos, you will soon become aware that many of them do not actually care very deeply for animal wellbeing, and them worrying about whether or not animals can give consent is usually just an excuse.
When they shun zoos and zoophilia, it is usually not with animals' best interests in mind. It is not like most of them could raise any legitimate concern toward zoophilia.
In addition, most anti-zoos act very immaturely toward the subject of zoophilia, condemning it in a knee-jerky fashion rather than with careful deliberation, which is further evidence that they are in no position to be passing right judgment.
The killing blow, in my opinion, is the fact that the average anti-zoo knows absolute jack about animal behavior and cognition. That means that all the absurd things they say about animals not being able to consent or understand sex are coming from a place of total ignorance about animals, and are vapid. They likely do not know the first thing about how animals think, so you should not take their advice on how to properly treat animals.
(There are, of course, some anti-zoos who do honestly care for animals, and misguidedly believe that zoophilic sex is inherently harmful. I have much more respect for this small set.)
If you prod most anti-zoos, you will soon become aware that many of them do not actually care very deeply for animal wellbeing, and them worrying about whether or not animals can give consent is usually just an excuse.
When they shun zoos and zoophilia, it is usually not with animals' best interests in mind. It is not like most of them could raise any legitimate concern toward zoophilia.
In addition, most anti-zoos act very immaturely toward the subject of zoophilia, condemning it in a knee-jerky fashion rather than with careful deliberation, which is further evidence that they are in no position to be passing right judgment.
The killing blow, in my opinion, is the fact that the average anti-zoo knows absolute jack about animal behavior and cognition. That means that all the absurd things they say about animals not being able to consent or understand sex are coming from a place of total ignorance about animals, and are vapid. They likely do not know the first thing about how animals think, so you should not take their advice on how to properly treat animals.
(There are, of course, some anti-zoos who do honestly care for animals, and misguidedly believe that zoophilic sex is inherently harmful. I have much more respect for this small set.)