- Discourage the practice of bestiality in the presence of fetish seekers.
As a community standard, I feel this is non-negotiable. The human component of human and animal sexual interaction cannot be ignored. If the human's motivations are put into question, then the moral basis for the first three principles (bestow kindness, put their wellbeing as equal to yours, put their wellbeing above sexual gratification) will necessarily be put into question. How? Expected performance (meets, training, baiting, professional porn production), objectification (the animal becomes the focus of the activity, because they are an animal, not because of its status as a being and moral agent), the human wants something other than establishing agency (kindness, emotional/physical wellbeing) of the animal participant such as orgasm, profit, social connections)
There are two big ways I see this being violated here and it's puzzling to me: the personals section, the porn section (glorification of the fetishization of certain sexual acts and monetization). There's also a fine line between objectification of animals and those who just want to have hot lusty sex with an animal. The latter can still care for the wellbeing of the animal before during and after the act. The former, well, it's open to debate. Your thoughts?
For reference:
In common parlance, the word fetish is used to refer to any sexually arousing stimuli, not all of which meet the medical criteria for fetishism.[ This broader usage of fetish covers parts or features of the body (including obesity and body modifications), objects, situations and activities (such as smoking or BDSM). Paraphilias such as urophilia, necrophilia and coprophilia have been described as fetishes. -Sexual fetishism - Wikipedia
bes·ti·al·i·ty: NOUN
-sexual intercourse between a person and an animal.
fet·ish: NOUN
-a form of sexual desire in which gratification is strongly linked to a particular object or activity or a part of the body other than the sexual organs