Would you class furry porn zoo

[furry zoo]

Trying to get everyone’s takes on this, would you classify furry porn as zoo porn

 

[Drallain]

Unless it features an animal, no I wouldn't. Furries are very different from biological animals.

 

[FoxyAdmirer12]

Well, some of the furry art contains pretty anatomally accurate animal genitals where it's clear that the artist had to examine how they look like pretty closely

 

[pes]

Feral, anatomically correct yiff yes. Even more yes if it contains a human having sex with the feral animal.

 

[Schuppentier]

Depends on the art piece. Alot of zoos a furs, allot of furs are zoos, but furry isn't zoo. Just because alot of people of a specific group has alot of overlap with another does not mean they are the same.

Alot of ravers take alot of drugs, but not all ravers are drug addicts nor all drug addicts are ravers.

 

[nekdoneco123]

if it strives to make the equipment anatomically correct (a canine with a spade/canine penis) i'd say yes. tho there seem to be many furries who seem to hate animal genitalia in the artwork.

 

[pes]

tho there seem to be many furries who seem to hate animal genitalia in the artwork.

They are in denial.

 

[nekdoneco123]

They are in denial.

in denial are the ones who want/need correct animal genitalia.

 

[Red Zoo]

i wouldnt because it seens a lot of furrys actually dont like animals, but rather "people" with animal traits. it would be the same as calling weebs zoo because they like 2d women with cat/dog ears/tails. furries follow this same path but a little more "exaggerated", with more animal characteristics, but they dont see those furry characters as actual animals.