BrushBunny
Tourist
I know we have Zeta, but apart from that I am not aware of anything else. Can tell me if there's a list of symbols somewhere, or what the flag is?
.. what did you assemble as your plan?
Do you plan on getting shot (or outside of U.S.: getting beaten) 37 times "accidentally" not only by the cops, but as well by every bystander that sees the corresponding flag?
The reason there's no need for a flag or a specific symbol lays in it resembling a widely visible sign expressing the enemy of almost anyone. You can only be proud as long as your head is intact, this means: don't do stupid things which might lead to it's destruction. Don't wear an IS flag or shirt in Manhattan, as well.
That's the reason why the zeta symbol is not worn visible anymore nowadays and you shouldn't join any alphabet demonstration with it visible. There were zetapin collars and even rings 20+ years ago.
This is an alternative to the new flag.
Alt is rarely used, I also think it's ugly.Wonderful. Looks outright like a splinter cell terrorist logo from Afghanistan / Iraq wars. Hooray. ?
Nah, I'll just forget about "zoo"-flags. Helps more in the long-term. Else there are 30 derivations of the "zoo" flag over just two years due to being outed and shunned on shortly after getting publicly known. Not necessary.
Quite clearly if someone wants to parade this flag somewhere in public, they are not from this planet.how physics works on this planet
You're freaking out about a flag that looks like it came from a video game? I understand how you feel if that was the flag of the bad guys but IRL if you want to see the flags of terrorists they usually consist of a weapon and a lot of funny looking scribble on it.Wonderful. Looks outright like a splinter cell terrorist logo from Afghanistan / Iraq wars. Hooray. ?
[/S]
Nah, I'll just forget about "zoo"-flags. Helps more in the long-term. Else there are 30 derivations of the "zoo" flag over just two years due to being outed and shunned on shortly after getting publicly known. Not necessary.
And it has red or black colors, which is a symbol of blood, fire, hell, death.You're freaking out about a flag that looks like it came from a video game? I understand how you feel if that was the flag of the bad guys but IRL if you want to see the flags of terrorists they usually consist of a weapon and a lot of funny looking scribble on it.
You're freaking out about a flag that looks like it came from a video game?
Zoophiles thrive in secrecy, is what I'm saying.
There's Zeta, and ..
But anyone else here also gets that random urge at 3:00 AM to just get up and record themselves as they graffiti the pride flag and a dog/cat/horse/cow/etc. on some random underpass? With a mask, hoodie, and sunglasses, of course.
That's quite an interesting viewpoint.They exist in secrecy.. at least if they want to exist for a long time without being hunt or jailed, yes.
Just: designing an own flag and being proud of it .. in the own 40 square meters approx.? Somehow I can't grasp the reason for this.
And waving it proudly outside would break the "secrecy" quite intensely.
Actually that's more than enough for like 90% of the anti's to recognize what you mean.
It was one of the first publicly worn signs on bracelets, jewellery and comparable. No easier way to get recognized, aside from being seen at erotic activities with animals..
..
No?
I might get the urge to paint my house walls outside in a nice white at 3 AM, tho. Not a fan of random useless graffiti anywhere, even less to express my erotic preferences.
It seems you've settled into thinking about zoophilia more as a fringe sexual preference, and I've noticed a lot of older zoos like you have, too.
But I'm more interested in Zoophilia as a kind of movement; I want to fight for the freedom to love whomever you want to love, regardless of species. I want to fight for non-humans, to free them of this dystopian nightmare that we've subjected them to.
This is why I'm interested in symbols, in flags, and in drawing propaganda: because I believe that the legalisation of zoophilia is the right thing; that it's something worth dying for.
Zoophiles thrive in secrecy, is what I'm saying.
The reason zoophilia is fringe is self-explanatory. Only a minority of humanity engages in it.How do you reach this conclusion?
Fringe? Why should my natural sexuality be fringe? It's as natural as what humans participate in mainly across population.
But you seem to think that individual sexuality aspects are something you need a movement for, which is incorrect.
Sexuality is an individual desire. As such different for each individual, even in slight amounts. And it goes further than sexuality - erotic interests span further than it. It can individually represent acceptable or unacceptable aspects, as well. It's not something you could just "allow for all" and have no more worries, as you can be sure that there are (lots of) people taking it to their own individual goals and those are not acceptable for most humans, even if the main concept would be legalized.
Else it wouldn't be necessary to have quite the clear set of rules for this forum. And differing opinions about those, all the time - by individuals which imagine "their" freedom outside of those.
A "freedom for all, independently and open-minded"? Sounds good, doesn't work.
Oh noes. Okay, good luck fighting for something which you can already participate fully unharmed in by keeping to your own concept:
Every bit of attention will reduce your usable grey areas and gets used to ensure more and more surveillance of the masses, everyone, to "keep them safe from scum like you", basically. I worked almost five years in exactly those areas of surveillance technologies prior and they're one of the "big things" of our time. Yay - or not?
Reason is simple: Because 90%+ of "the masses" aka majority actually are sure that you are scum and there's no way to prove them otherwise. As such it's an easy way to get industrial and state-related interests into acceptance for the masses: by telling them it's necessary to prevent something 90%+ of them hate deeply. Yay for those activists creating tools allowing steering of mass decisions.
Not that it would help anyone anywhere at the end. Because at the end all suffer from less freedom: the few "bad ones" exactly the same as all "good ones" - depending on the standpoint.
There were times where zoophiles were less hunted. Medial coverage (which follows any activism) did not change anything to the better.
Fortunately I don't need to "die for my sexual interests", as they are a fully private thing to participate in.
The reason zoophilia is fringe is self-explanatory. Only a minority of humanity engages in it.