Thoughts

[Tsgothgirl]

So my friend who shared his pitbull
Is being monitored by police because he had videos 14 yr girl with his dog first off I'm a huge supporter of this community and I dont care for people or they're lifestyles but isnt it wrong to do enticed children/teens into the lifestyle I mean i know in w some people in here are into this taboo as well as darker things but as an open minded individual studying the ideal human mind I would like all answers

 

[pes]

Great, another idiot who is going to strengthen the nonsensical pedo/zoo connection in the eyes of the public. Great job really, it is people like this who keep us from improving our public image.
Would it be so hard to wait for her to be 18 or whatever the legal age is in the country. Obviously yes because that guy is not a zoophile, I bet he just loves to watch weird stuff happen to women which zoo unfortunately fits into.

 

[minvalue]

discussion of pedophilia is against the forum rules, so I dont know how much discussion there is going to be besides people (rightfully) pointing out how fucked up it was for him to do that. That would be statutory rape if he himself did it too, not sure how the dog changes things

 

[Tsgothgirl]

Well I didn't want to discuss pedophilia what I was trying to reach at is when we are young and a majority of us have we get curious and there is a post based on how old we were when we got into zoo my point of view is I dont think it's right I mean as we adventure are sexuality it is through interests and curiosities not but its wrong for someone to push someone like luring a kid with icecream.. it's wrong and just aweful

but I should delete this thread
can some one help me with that?

 

[nekdoneco123]

discussion of pedophilia is against the forum rules, so I dont know how much discussion there is going to be besides people (rightfully) pointing out how fucked up it was for him to do that. That would be statutory rape if he himself did it too, not sure how the dog changes things

the dog changes things for us if it ever gets in the news, the guy will get labeled a zoophile (even tho he's a probably a fetishist voyeur). at best we'll be seen as a little worse in the eyes of the public (ie: what's new?) at worst some more anti-zoo laws get pushed.. it bugs me to no end how anytime sex and animal is used in a single sentence the conclusion is always "yeah, he's a zoophile. they are all like that"