So... hypothetically... if an animal is accepting or craving sexual attention, it's not okay to do fondling, foreplay and/or toys to give them pleasure? I would think as long as they're not being restrained/forced and respond positively (or indifferent) to what you're doing with them, then why would such things be - in your opinion - "abuse"? ?believe that the use of toys or hands in sexual intercourse with animals should be considered abuse
Do you also see it as wrong when M/M or gay men use a Fleshlight on a male animal?here I am also referring to F/F or lesbian women who use their hands and sex toys in the act
I like the normal act without toys and hands. considers that even if the animal accepts it is not a natural zoo thing
Yes, without human interaction, and animal wouldn't naturally use a human toy. Doesn't make it "abuse". Also, I assume the phrase "not a natural zoo thing" was suppose to be "not a natural animal thing" because otherwise you appear to be speaking for all zoos there.even if the animal accepts it is not a natural zoo thing
one mare in heat used a door handle, when the normie farm hand finally figured out why it was slippery nearly killed me by laughter (It did become a problem, we used one of those dog toys bolted to a wall and blocked off the door handle, I helped her out when I could)Yes, without human interaction, and animal wouldn't naturally use a human toy. Doesn't make it "abuse". Also, I assume the phrase "not a natural zoo thing" was suppose to be "not a natural animal thing" because otherwise you appear to be speaking for all zoos there.
However, animals can be seen rubbing their junk on all kinds of things when they're horny, including people.
BTW, sex toys aren't really a "natural" thing for humans, either, but they can be fun.