So... hypothetically... if an animal is accepting or craving sexual attention, it's not okay to do fondling, foreplay and/or toys to give them pleasure? I would think as long as they're not being restrained/forced and respond positively (or indifferent) to what you're doing with them, then why would such things be - in your opinion - "abuse"? ?believe that the use of toys or hands in sexual intercourse with animals should be considered abuse
Do you also see it as wrong when M/M or gay men use a Fleshlight on a male animal?here I am also referring to F/F or lesbian women who use their hands and sex toys in the act
I like the normal act without toys and hands. considers that even if the animal accepts it is not a natural zoo thing
Yes, without human interaction, and animal wouldn't naturally use a human toy. Doesn't make it "abuse". Also, I assume the phrase "not a natural zoo thing" was suppose to be "not a natural animal thing" because otherwise you appear to be speaking for all zoos there.even if the animal accepts it is not a natural zoo thing