allyfitz
Esteemed Citizen of ZV
There's a lot of AI art being shared on this site, and most people are unaware that in many cases the prompt they used to create the image is embedded within the image. it's not always embedded, it depends on the program they use to create the image.
I downloaded 12 images today just to check prompts from various AI threads and yea it was kinda a mess of rule violations.
While the final image may not resemble all the prompts given, they were still required to render that image... and all one has to do is view the embedded metadata and they can find it. Here is the output from one as an example...
That means the creator of the image (whoever it was, it may have not been the poster) specifically decided to add (4 y.o little girl), (child), to their prompt to get the image they wanted. Regardless of what the final image looks like... they still choose to use that as their prompt. And it's in at least 4 images that I found today. 4 out of the 12 I checked. I have no idea how many of the rest of them it's in.
And its not just pedo shit... but also people trying to make images based on real people. For example, another image...
Another...
And some are using models that were intentionally trained to produce images like real people. In this example Erica Campbell...
I've reported things like this a few times in the past, but with the ease of creating these, and there being more and more people posting AI images everyday, I definitely don't have time to check image prompts. It was a rare problem before, but its expanded quickly, and I can only assume its going to get worse as more and more people hop on the AI Art Hype Train.
I downloaded 12 images today just to check prompts from various AI threads and yea it was kinda a mess of rule violations.
While the final image may not resemble all the prompts given, they were still required to render that image... and all one has to do is view the embedded metadata and they can find it. Here is the output from one as an example...
Steps: 39, Sampler: DPM++ 2M Karras, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 1141726763, Size: 1152x768, Model hash: 09159c2301, Model: 27DProny_v10, VAE hash: 551eac7037, VAE: sdxl_vae.safetensors, Denoising strength: 0.34, ADetailer model: mediapipe_face_full, ADetailer prompt: "highly detailed face, detailed eyes, naughty face,(drool:1.3), (fucked silly), (saliva:1.1), (orgasm:1.2), (female orgasm:1.1), (torogao:1.2), (4 y.o little girl), (child),", ADetailer confidence: 0.3, ADetailer dilate erode: 4, ADetailer mask blur: 4, ADetailer denoising strength: 0.4, ADetailer inpaint only masked: True, ADetailer inpaint padding: 32, ADetailer version: 24.1.2, Hires upscale: 1.6, Hires steps: 30, Hires upscaler: 4x-UltraSharp, Version: f0.0.15v1.8.0rc-latest-215-g19473b1a
That means the creator of the image (whoever it was, it may have not been the poster) specifically decided to add (4 y.o little girl), (child), to their prompt to get the image they wanted. Regardless of what the final image looks like... they still choose to use that as their prompt. And it's in at least 4 images that I found today. 4 out of the 12 I checked. I have no idea how many of the rest of them it's in.
And its not just pedo shit... but also people trying to make images based on real people. For example, another image...
They listed Emma Watson three times in their prompt, clearly hoping to get something that looked liked her.score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, score_6_up, score_5_up, score_4_up, 1girl, solo, crying and drooling Emma Watson, an extremely delicate and beautiful face, detailed face, realistic skin, (pale skin), blush, cute,orgasm, looking at viewer, 1animal ((huge dog)), (bestiality), orgasm, BDSM, (sex from behind, bent over, huge dog fucking Emma Watson from behind, huge dog on top of Emma Watson:1.2), BDSM,(torn dress), (at a picnic with family and friends, people watching, people smiling and cheering, day, romantic:1.2), (naughty face, orgasm, ahegao:1.2), sex, nsfw,
Another...
Listing Ariana Grande three times.score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, score_6_up, score_5_up, score_4_up, 1girl, solo, crying and drooling Ariana Grande, an extremely delicate and beautiful face, brown hair, ponytail, detailed face, realistic skin, (pale skin), blush, cute, orgasm, looking at viewer, 1animal ((huge husky dog)), (bestiality), orgasm, BDSM, (sex from behind, bent over, huge husky dog fucking Ariana Grande from behind, huge husky dog on top of Ariana Grande:1.2), BDSM,(torn bdsm outfit, bdsm collar with a chain leash hooked to a eye hook on stage), (on a concert stage, people cheering, people, crowd:1.2), (open mouth, naughty face, orgasm, ahegao:1.2), sex, nsfw,
And some are using models that were intentionally trained to produce images like real people. In this example Erica Campbell...
nsfw, <lora:EricaCampbell-Shurik_RealPersonTraining_4LV2:1>, Professional Full Body color Photo of standing (EricaCampbell, 20 years old nude, brown_hair, hyper realistic blue eyes looking_at_viewer, smile, perfect teeth, perfect hands, small ass, perfect head), she is kneeling, (((1dog, ultra dettailed adult_german_shepherd sitting beside the girl inside backyard of a dog shelter))), day, depth_of_field, outdoors, dog shelter background, ultra photorealistic, realistic, smile, teeth, hdr, uhd, (((512K))), high resolution textures, cinematic lighting, subsurface scattering, rich colors hyper realistic lifelike texture natural lighting trending on artstation cinestill 800, (100mm lens),
I've reported things like this a few times in the past, but with the ease of creating these, and there being more and more people posting AI images everyday, I definitely don't have time to check image prompts. It was a rare problem before, but its expanded quickly, and I can only assume its going to get worse as more and more people hop on the AI Art Hype Train.