WhiteWomanMoment
Tourist
So for a little while I've thought about this pitch for an erotic comic about two women. One of them is a cis lady who I thought of as an active zoo exclusive and the other is a trans chick who tries to charm her. At first this is an NTR/cuckoldry story as the trans woman strikes a date with her, goes to her home only to find out that she has no interest in her body and would much rather have the dicked lady masturbate to her mating with her dog. The zoo keeps her around at first as a sort of zoo equivalent of a beard (a partner meant to obfuscate her true attractions) and because both of them have a common interest in extreme kinks and many paraphilias (note that they are never interested in zoosadism or anything adjacent to pedophilia); but due to the latter reason over time it blooms into a queerplatonic relationship as the cis zoo gets the other one into becoming a fellow active zoo.
I assume that folks can be zoo exclusive in different ways; with hers manifesting from being an allosexual aromantic woman who finds solace having sex with animals who enjoy sex with her purely for the act of seeking pleasure with her body as she too only finds sexual fulfillment in the moment, without attraction. This anchors her overarching perspective that rejects social constructs and abstractions as valid in opposition to concrete base needs and desires that she values, in the style of Max Stirner's Egoist ideology. Or at least that's the first draft of her. This has some base assumptions about not only zoo exclusive people's psychology but also of how a concensual interspecies sexual relationship operates that I would like to verify or rectify. I'd like to have an accurate understanding of what makes someone a zoo exclusive and how consensual bestiality works, not only for it's own sake but also because I want to convey a calm almost aloof sexologically intelligent and compelling perspective that falls flat if the facts that she matter-of-factually states are blatantly false.
I apologise if this post would be more appropriate on another topic such as the stories and writing section.
I assume that folks can be zoo exclusive in different ways; with hers manifesting from being an allosexual aromantic woman who finds solace having sex with animals who enjoy sex with her purely for the act of seeking pleasure with her body as she too only finds sexual fulfillment in the moment, without attraction. This anchors her overarching perspective that rejects social constructs and abstractions as valid in opposition to concrete base needs and desires that she values, in the style of Max Stirner's Egoist ideology. Or at least that's the first draft of her. This has some base assumptions about not only zoo exclusive people's psychology but also of how a concensual interspecies sexual relationship operates that I would like to verify or rectify. I'd like to have an accurate understanding of what makes someone a zoo exclusive and how consensual bestiality works, not only for it's own sake but also because I want to convey a calm almost aloof sexologically intelligent and compelling perspective that falls flat if the facts that she matter-of-factually states are blatantly false.
I apologise if this post would be more appropriate on another topic such as the stories and writing section.