• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

just wanted to bitch and make it known that i completely disagree in the decision to delete my post of bodil joensen as commercial crap

should early zoophilia pornographic films from the early 1970's be considered commercial crap

  • yes , who cares about old crap

    Votes: 5 20.0%

  • no, it should be preserved and remain so others can view it as an example of early zoophilia films

    Votes: 13 52.0%

  • meh , dont care either way

    Votes: 5 20.0%

  • no , nostalgia has a value that should be appreciated and place it above commercial crap in value

    Votes: 2 8.0%
  • Total voters
    25
  • This poll will close: .
x51

x51

Citizen of Zooville
just wanted to bitch and make it known that i completely disagree in the decision to delete my post of bodil joensen as commercial crap , while it may not be quite up to modern standards for quality being that it is approximately 50-55 years old, it is hardly "commercial crap" i feel that it should be preserved for posterity as an example of early zoophilia pornographic media .
 
x51 said:
just wanted to bitch and make it known that i completely disagree in the decision to delete my post of bodil joensen as commercial crap , while it may not be quite up to modern standards for quality being that it is approximately 50-55 years old, it is hardly "commercial crap" i feel that it should be preserved for posterity as an example of early zoophilia pornographic media .
Click to expand...
Youve been here almost a year, and you still don't know the rules?
 
saddlebum66 said:
Youve been here almost a year, and you still don't know the rules?
Click to expand...
well actually i thought it may have had nostalgic value , and actually i do know the rules, do you?
this being produced well before 2008 puts it in a bit of a grey area as far as the rules go , wouldn't you say?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nope, I wouldnt say.
A) Such material has not been welcome here for a couple of years.
B) For it to be of nostalgic value, the average age here would have to be 20 years older than it is
C) The flick is fifty years old, or about to be. The Chicquita who starred in it is irrevocably dead. Why would a technically challenged video, thats been stepped on a dozen times have much value in the state its in?
 
saddlebum66 said:
Nope, I wouldnt say.
A) Such material has not been welcome here for a couple of years.
B) For it to be of nostalgic value, the average age here would have to be 20 years older than it is
C) The flick is fifty years old, or about to be. The Chicquita who starred in it is irrevocably dead. Why would a technically challenged video, thats been stepped on a dozen times have much value in the state its in?
Click to expand...
Why would a technically challenged video, thats been stepped on a dozen times have much value in the state its in?
Click to expand...
well obviously since little of that era has been digitized , leaving few options for those interested in films of this era to actually see them, its not likely many folks want to come and hang out with my miserable old unpleasant tweaker ass and watch this on an 8mm projector and hope it doesnt fuck up and catch on fire
 
x51 said:
this being produced well before 2008 puts it in a bit of a grey area as far as the rules go , wouldn't you say?
Click to expand...
Yes.

And if you read the rules:

Much older porn is a gray area, and can be removed without warning.
Click to expand...

The rules basically say it can be removed with little to no warning, for whatever reason the moderators deem necessary.
The stuff's removed. Get over it.
 
Last edited:
Bloit said:
Yes.

And if you read the rules:

Much older porn is a gray area, and can be removed without warning
Click to expand...
i do believe the following sentence beyond, and can be removed without warning. states that to be the case, if the material posted is reported due to the condition of the animal . does it not?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
x51 said:
i do believe the following sentence beyond, and can be removed without warning. states that to be the case, if the material posted is reported due to the condition of the animal . does it not?
Click to expand...
"OR".

Fucking read.

I love eating dick, though. Not sure how that's an insult.
 
canecorso said:
The question to ask here would be, was the content abusive or otherwise exploitative?
Click to expand...
not even in the slightest, the old school stuff was really quite tame especially in comparison to the newer stuff , and besides that bodil joensen had such a pure and deep love for animals that she would have never been a part of anything that even remotely hinted at that . she was a wonderful , good woman and it is truly quite sad how things ended up for her , she truly deserved so much better 😥
 
I do not know the full context but I think when something starts hinging on 'the nostalgic value of my favourite porn from decades ago' you might want to check yourself 😅
 
well the early linda lovelace vintage zoo film i posted was deleted regardless of the fact that quite a few people apparently enjoyed it as it was reacted to positively by all , well all but the person who actually deleted it . since the mods apparently clearly take such issue with my sharing of my vintage zoophilia erotica i guess it makes little sense to bother posting any more of it since it will doubtlessly just be removed by some cretin with no appreciation of nostalgia or early zoo erotica even though so many enjoyed it
(oh and by the way , you missed one , you philistine.) 🖕😠🖕
 
Your video was removed, because it was a repost, because someone else posted it already.
The disk space on the forum is not unlimited.
You were notified of that fact and curiously managed to omit it in your post.
 
pes said:
Your video was removed, because it was a repost, because someone else posted it already.
The disk space on the forum is not unlimited.
You were notified of that fact and curiously managed to omit it in your post.
Click to expand...
thank you for you letting me know. im sure you can understand how having posts just deleted without knowing the reason why can be confusing ad beyond frustrating.
but now that i understand the reason i find it to be completely reasonable and agree with the decision .
thank you again Pes for taking the time to let me know, you're a good mod and i appreciate that you took the time to , even though you had no obligation to so

edit ; i do apologize , i somehow missed the notification as to the reason for its removal.
i take complete responsibility for that as it was almost certainly due to my own lack of sleep, and as such totally my fault due to my own negligence .
and i apologize for being a cunt as a result of that negligence
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top