• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Is it even possible ?

Doggo513

Doggo513

Citizen of Zooville
So im wondering if it’s possible for a dog to knot someone’s throat? I know you could deep throat them down to the knot, but has anyone been facefucked and had their mouth knotted ? If so, how was it?
 
It’s possible you can deep throat him before he swells but would not be advised. If he swells sealing your mouth full and stretches your airway, you will suffocate.
 
Lol, sometimes your questions are hilarious! If someone has a low gag reflex, I'd imagine you could enclose the knot in your mouth by sealing it with you lips around it. Other than that, I don't see a possible way of knotting the back of someone's throat. Even if it was possible, I cannot imagine that being comfortable at all. But I'm a straight zoo, so what do I know?
 
Doggo513 said:
So im wondering if it’s possible for a dog to knot someone’s throat? I know you could deep throat them down to the knot, but has anyone been facefucked and had their mouth knotted ? If so, how was it?
Click to expand...
If you wanna try this and the knot DOES swell before you could get it out of your mouth, you better be prepared to dislocate your jaw or something, because you're a dead-man otherwise! You definitely don't want to be found dead from suffocating on a dog dong!
 
FloofyNewfie said:
Lol, sometimes your questions are hilarious! If someone has a low gag reflex, I'd imagine you could enclose the knot in your mouth by sealing it with you lips around it. Other than that, I don't see a possible way of knotting the back of someone's throat. Even if it was possible, I cannot imagine that being comfortable at all. But I'm a straight zoo, so what do I know?
Click to expand...
alot
 
Wet Fortune Cookie said:
99% of it is good to me!!
Click to expand...
If you say so. Guess my standard of "good" is different than yours. I mean, come on - I've encountered stuff over there that ranges in quality from "photorealistic and great" to "A 2 year old with a crayon could produce better - and probably has", which ignores some of the stuff Ive stumbled over that looked like it actually WAS done with a crayon!
 
UR20Z said:
If you say so. Guess my standard of "good" is different than yours. I mean, come on - I've encountered stuff over there that ranges in quality from "photorealistic and great" to "A 2 year old with a crayon could produce better - and probably has", which ignores some of the stuff Ive stumbled over that looked like it actually WAS done with a crayon!
Click to expand...
hey man, artists can use whatever they want to produce their art! I love it either way... unless it was made of dirt. then why would you do this
 
Wet Fortune Cookie said:
hey man, artists can use whatever they want to produce their art! I love it either way... unless it was made of dirt. then why would you do this
Click to expand...
Yeah, use the media that works for you. But fergawdsake, exhibit at least the TINIEST trace of talent when doing so! A few damn-near-random strokes of a crayon isn't "art" by any definition that holds any meaning for me. When I gripe about crayons, I'm referring to the stuff that looks like what little Johnny brings home from kindergarten to be hung on the fridge - a brown or black box with a triangle on top, with a little box "chimney" on one side of that with a loop-the-loop of black or gray "smoke" rising out of it, and a couple of squares with plus-signs in 'em as windows on the "house" box, a brown thing on one side with a blob of green at the top as a tree, and a trio of stick-figures in front - one small, two large, one of the large ones with long strips of color on the top of the "head" for hair as "mommy" and maybe some color on the "face" of the other as "daddy", and maybe a circle on four stalks as "kitty" or "doggy". Save us both the dancing - don't even try to pretend you don't understand what I'm talking about.

And what's wrong with dirt as a medium? Never heard of pottery or sculpture? :devilish:
 
UR20Z said:
Yeah, use the media that works for you. But fergawdsake, exhibit at least the TINIEST trace of talent when doing so! A few damn-near-random strokes of a crayon isn't "art" by any definition that holds any meaning for me. When I gripe about crayons, I'm referring to the stuff that looks like what little Johnny brings home from kindergarten to be hung on the fridge - a brown or black box with a triangle on top, with a little box "chimney" on one side of that with a loop-the-loop of black or gray "smoke" rising out of it, and a couple of squares with plus-signs in 'em as windows on the "house" box, a brown thing on one side with a blob of green at the top as a tree, and a trio of stick-figures in front - one small, two large, one of the large ones with long strips of color on the top of the "head" for hair as "mommy" and maybe some color on the "face" of the other as "daddy", and maybe a circle on four stalks as "kitty" or "doggy". Save us both the dancing - don't even try to pretend you don't understand what I'm talking about.

And what's wrong with dirt as a medium? Never heard of pottery or sculpture? :devilish:
Click to expand...
but but these are adults we are talking about
 
Reconscope said:
but but these are adults we are talking about
Click to expand...
Precisely my point... Adults who fancy themselves "artists". Adults who (apparently) can't produce a picture that can be recognized as "Hey, that's a dog/horse/dragon/whatever" without a caption explaining that's what it's supposed to be. One of the ones I've stumbled across actually WAS a bunch of stick-figures, labeled as being an orgy involving dogs and deer - and it did indeed look like it had been drawn with crayons. But if there was a deer or dog to be seen in it, I sure as hell couldn't find it!
 
UR20Z said:
Precisely my point... Adults who fancy themselves "artists". Adults who (apparently) can't produce a picture that can be recognized as "Hey, that's a dog/horse/dragon/whatever" without a caption explaining that's what it's supposed to be. One of the ones I've stumbled across actually WAS a bunch of stick-figures, labeled as being an orgy involving dogs and deer - and it did indeed look like it had been drawn with crayons. But if there was a deer or dog to be seen in it, I sure as hell couldn't find it!
Click to expand...
technically its a stickjob lul
 
Depending on the size of the dog, you might get the knot behind your teeth, but most of us aren't real into being eyeball to asshole with a dog. Anything much bigger than the distance between your upper jaw and you open lower jaw isn't gonna work. Being bitten by a dog that thinks HE 'S being bitten is no fun. I remember a story with an episode of this... Erotic but laughable at the same time.... Chickee and a Rott.
 
FloofyNewfie said:
Lol, sometimes your questions are hilarious! If someone has a low gag reflex, I'd imagine you could enclose the knot in your mouth by sealing it with you lips around it. Other than that, I don't see a possible way of knotting the back of someone's throat. Even if it was possible, I cannot imagine that being comfortable at all. But I'm a straight zoo, so what do I know?
Click to expand...
oh oh maybe a sword swallow artist at the fair?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top