• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Into Zoophilia but not sure I agree with the ethics

Zooboy:3

Zooboy:3

Lurker
Ok so everyone reading this knows about how "zoophilia is a form of Animal cruelty" & zoophiles are horrible. well, I somewhat agree with those opinions but I am into zoophilia porn & the idea of being sexual with animals. So the only experiences I have had IRL are my dog liking my pussy and humping my cat. I need some help. all opinions and advice are welcomed and appreciated.
 
Yea, those are just the normal broken record anti's with no new wordings... Realistically zoophilia is an attraction to animals.
There's always bad eggs in anything, and there's some content out there that treat an animal like it's a warm pocket pussy. Just watching zoo porn doesn't make someone "a zoo."
There can be many good people out there, but you never see that as the bad always makes itself loud and clear for all to hear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
It may be individual. I can't speak for every person in the world. Most times someone may be finding it attractive just because a woman is in it. There's some that are attracted to the animal in it.
I feel like the next part I'll say is going to contradict my other statement. But if someone gets genuinely attracted to zoo porn may find themselves wanting to do the real thing.
Though one should build a relationship with their companion and not just go balls in expecting sex.
 
Zooboy:3 said:
yeah, that makes sense. but non zoos wouldn't find Zoo porn attractive right?
Click to expand...
there's plenty of those on this very site. folk just looking for someone else to "perform" for them, just attracted to the idea of a woman doing something "taboo" or "degrading". plenty of discussion in the porn section also boils down to "anyone got more of this girl?", completely disregarding the animal participant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pes
I use to think why am I like this and fought with my feelings for years until I found this site and realized I am not alone. I am how I am and it just dose not matter what other mite think your sexuality is your sexuality it's for you to decide. As far as it being cruel most of use on here don't agree with that. Most zoosexual take better care of their animals and have better and healthier relationship with them then nonzoo do. I fill people say that as a way to try and justify their belief and condem someone's sexuality becuas it is gross and disgusting to them and/or it's against their religious belief. It is a subject you should look deeply into before you make up your mind. There is a lot of information on here and elsewhere so take your time.
 
I take what I can deal with, enjoy, and can handle and leave the things that don’t work For me.
 
It's hard for a lot of people to think critically about zoosexuality, because it's been pounded into us all by modern society that sex with animals is wrong. But is it? Let's say you let a male dog mount you and he gets to cum inside you. Where exactly in that exchange was he suffering animal cruelty? The truth of the matter is, zoos are suffering from a deeply inset unfair social stigma.
 
How is having sexual relations with an obviously willing animal more harmful than murdering one for consumption? Assuming that the animal is sexually mature, capable of participating in the sex act without being physically harmed, and is a willing participant, there really is no actual harm being done to the animal involved. The only harm is to social “morals” and norms of society. I mean don’t get me wrong, there are definitely legitimate animal abusers out there who sexually abuse/harm animals, but most zoos are not that way. The stigma surrounding bestiality is more of a morality issue rather than an abuse or harm issue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top