CanineRomantic
Tourist
Debated where to post this and decided to be a bit of a spoil sport and put it in the more controversial section. Happy for it to be moved.
Everyone, human or animal, has their tendency to natural instincts during sex. Males of all species tend to grab on to hips or other parts of female partners in order to assist the gaining purchase and penetration (as just one example). The question I have goes, in some ways, to the core of the fetish/sexuality question. The question is how much is a female dog's tendency to relax and let the penetrating partner... well... penetrate the act of a consenting partner or simply the natural instinct of a receiving partner?
I know that dogs (and this applies beyond just dogs of course but my observations are mostly with canines) have no problem letting their discomfort be known about attempts to engage in sex, during sex and after she has decided she is finished with sex. At the same time we have all had the misfortune of encountering content that is undeniably abusive no matter the eexcellent efforts of folks on this forum to weed that out. There is a part of me that questions how often a lack of what we are calling enthusiastic consent of late is visible in zoo porn. It's wonderful to see girls rutting back on the penetrating partner's cock but what about content where it's all in the penetrating partner's actions? There is one video out there I have seen where the coment is made "keep thrusting or she'll try to get away" or something similarly questionable.
Which got me thinking, while we always hope people have established a strong communication and trust bond with a canine companion how often is that being overlooked to a female's instinct to protect herself and "just let it happen" as it were? I overthink things and no doubt many experienced folk wll roll their eyes here and not bother because when you know you know. But for those out there without the fortune of that real life experience how much is this a risk? The concept of learned helplessness comes to mind. A stanford experiment that you can look up if you want to feel a bit sick the way the old stanford experiments tend to make people of good conscience feel. Is that, on top of the potential of it being just natural sexual instinct to submit, at play here and misleading those who learn from watching and little else?
Keeping it relevant to the subforum, how much of the objectifying nature of the fetish style interest comes from the enjoyment of a sexual partner who by instinct just let's the penetrating partner go for his life once he is in?
Everyone, human or animal, has their tendency to natural instincts during sex. Males of all species tend to grab on to hips or other parts of female partners in order to assist the gaining purchase and penetration (as just one example). The question I have goes, in some ways, to the core of the fetish/sexuality question. The question is how much is a female dog's tendency to relax and let the penetrating partner... well... penetrate the act of a consenting partner or simply the natural instinct of a receiving partner?
I know that dogs (and this applies beyond just dogs of course but my observations are mostly with canines) have no problem letting their discomfort be known about attempts to engage in sex, during sex and after she has decided she is finished with sex. At the same time we have all had the misfortune of encountering content that is undeniably abusive no matter the eexcellent efforts of folks on this forum to weed that out. There is a part of me that questions how often a lack of what we are calling enthusiastic consent of late is visible in zoo porn. It's wonderful to see girls rutting back on the penetrating partner's cock but what about content where it's all in the penetrating partner's actions? There is one video out there I have seen where the coment is made "keep thrusting or she'll try to get away" or something similarly questionable.
Which got me thinking, while we always hope people have established a strong communication and trust bond with a canine companion how often is that being overlooked to a female's instinct to protect herself and "just let it happen" as it were? I overthink things and no doubt many experienced folk wll roll their eyes here and not bother because when you know you know. But for those out there without the fortune of that real life experience how much is this a risk? The concept of learned helplessness comes to mind. A stanford experiment that you can look up if you want to feel a bit sick the way the old stanford experiments tend to make people of good conscience feel. Is that, on top of the potential of it being just natural sexual instinct to submit, at play here and misleading those who learn from watching and little else?
Keeping it relevant to the subforum, how much of the objectifying nature of the fetish style interest comes from the enjoyment of a sexual partner who by instinct just let's the penetrating partner go for his life once he is in?