Hello guys, I'm a zoo romantic and anything (pan?)sexual. Ik how to ask for sex from just about anything but another person and it's super frustrating (I think I'm autistic but that's another story). I'd like to know how do you ask other people for sex too??? Ik this is a beast forum but I feel like I can ask you guys lol, I don't want friends just a good d-ing and go about my business. I'd like advice please I can't be alone in this...
I have a pet hypothesis, as yet without anything except anecdotal support.
I think it is possible that some zoos become zoos because of a phenomenon that I will call "kin-group misidentification." To explain this, I first have to explain what I mean by kin-group.
Your kin-group constitutes living things in your life that you treat like your own kind. You instinctively see members of your own kin-group as more diverse and as having more complex behaviors than people outside your kin-group. You tend to dementalize people that are outside your own kin-group.
To dementalize refers to "denial of mind," which can happen in two ways. Firstly, dementalization can occur based on the denial of the complexity of someone's experience. Secondly, dementalization can occur based on the denial of the intensity of someone's experience. For example, a privileged member of Victorian Era aristocracy might praise commoners for being hardworking, but they will probably also insist that commoners have simpler jobs than aristocracy, which is not always true. On the other hand, the commoner might look back at the aristocracy and, while acknowledging that aristocracy must need to be very educated to do their jobs, assume that aristocrats also are lazy, tend to devote ample time to leisure, and have very little stress in their lives, which is not always true. Someone could engage in both forms of dementalization, which is how we treat criminals, animals we consume as meat (pigs or chickens, for instance), members of gangs, mice that invade our homes, and other groups of people or animals that we see as not having any particular reason to remain alive.
Because we dementalize these non-kin groups, it is easier for us to treat them badly without feeling very guilty about it. The aristocrat finds it easy to treat the commoner the same way as they would treat an eight year old child with a learning disability. The commoner finds it easy to regard the aristocrat as a heartless, calculating, ruthless monster, except when being given money or charity by that aristocrat.Both of them are very happy to deal out excessive punishments to people whom they perceive as criminals, even if those punishments are really disproportionate and not really all that likely to change people's behavior. Both of them make it easier for themselves to engage in bad behavior without feeling all that terrible for having done so.
Dementalizing others does not really help us in the long-run, for because we tend to have a distorted idea of how their minds actually work, we tend to fail miserably at understanding or predicting their behavior. In fact, two different people that do not see each other as being in their kin-group might superficially appear to be autistic when they are dealing with each other, even though they function very normally within their own kin-group.
Therefore, I think that some...but not all...zoophiles might have somehow identified the animals they are attracted to as their kin-group, and they therefore find it hard to see humans in the same way as they would see someone that is within their kin-group.
This might be blunting our social skills so badly that we appear superficially to have autism.
If I am right, then I can propose a remedy, and I am going to base it on the same techniques that animal rights advocates use to get people to care about animal rights.
Start with any person that accepts that you are a zoophile, whether or not that person is a zoophile. Observe that person's behavior for any behavior at all that you can link with behaviors that you identify with the animal that you are attracted to. For instance, that person might get a similar look in their eyes when you let them talk about their favorite subject that your dog gets when you pick up a ball in preparation to play a game of fetch: obviously, they feel extremely good when they are talking about a favorite subject. Therefore, you can link "let my friend talk about their favorite subject" with "take my dog out to play fetch." From there, you progress with trying to find links until you have confirmed, in your mind, that humans...at least ones that do not make you feel threatened over your zooiness...are not really all that different from dogs. Keep telling yourself how similar they really are until it clicks in your head that your friend is in the same kin-group as your pet dog.
If I am right and if you try this little trick, then you will start seeing your friend's non-verbal language as clearly as if that person were your pet dog. In fact, you might come close to believing that your friend "has a dog's soul," even if you do not really literally believe that this is a fact. It would not be a literal belief, but it would be your acknowledgement of the fact that you have abolished a false illusion that had previously dwarfed your perception. Human friends in your kin-group would be just as transparent to you as your pet dog.
I am not sure that I am right, but if I am right, then this would constitute useful knowledge.