• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Do you think this sexual act is becoming more popular with the younger female generation

What makes you think this? Just out of curiosity.

I personally believe that there are just as many zoophile/bestialist women out there as there are men. However, I’ve noticed that many women (including myself) tend to be more on the cautious side when it comes to expressing traits that they may be ashamed of or that others may tear them apart for. So we tend to hide it, repress it, or stay reserved about it. And we’re even more reserved about our sexual desires when there are horny men around begging to hear every detail of our intimate moments. Sex in general is something a lot of us are sort of conditioned not to be super open or expressive about irl, lest we want to garner a bad reputation, so I imagine sex with animals is even more worrying.

Granted, this isn’t meant to speak for every woman, but this is what I’ve noticed personally and why even I choose not to delve too deep into my sex life/sexual urges.

But just cause we don’t show up as much in the community doesn’t mean there’s not a good portion of us out there.

Reminds me of something gruesome my Mama once told me: “Oh yeah, you can bet your ass there’s female serial killers out there. They likely just take better care not to get caught.”
 
too many variables to conclude anything in regard to the OP's question.

one thing i can say for sure is that this new generation of people have access to more information about this lifestyle than any other generations prior. the internet evolution has allowed people to readily seek out their curiosities and learn how to act on them. this of itself could be a big contributor amongst the other bazillion variables.
 
Jewelry Fish said:
What makes you think this? Just out of curiosity.

I personally believe that there are just as many zoophile/bestialist women out there as there are men. However, I’ve noticed that many women (including myself) tend to be more on the cautious side when it comes to expressing traits that they may be ashamed of or that others may tear them apart for. So we tend to hide it, repress it, or stay reserved about it. And we’re even more reserved about our sexual desires when there are horny men around begging to hear every detail of our intimate moments. Sex in general is something a lot of us are sort of conditioned not to be super open or expressive about irl, lest we want to garner a bad reputation, so I imagine sex with animals is even more worrying.

Granted, this isn’t meant to speak for every woman, but this is what I’ve noticed personally and why even I choose not to delve too deep into my sex life/sexual urges.

But just cause we don’t show up as much in the community doesn’t mean there’s not a good portion of us out there.

Reminds me of something gruesome my Mama once told me: “Oh yeah, you can bet your ass there’s female serial killers out there. They likely just take better care not to get caught.”
Click to expand...
Well said ?
 
ScotExotic said:
Beast kink is the only practical means available for furries to get their rocks off. As the fandom increases so will it. This is just one component to a broader hypothetical increase in popularity.
Click to expand...
I would agree with this however Hani Miletski has proven that this is a sexuality. Hopefully, the numbers would not be increasing because people are in it for the kicks. That's the wrong reason.
 
Calm down all I was saying is that it is more than a kink or a fetish. It's a sexuality of which those feelings will not just disappear. Additionally, I was stating that you should be in it more for your animal than yourself. Animals have feelings as well and using them isn't cool :3. You can't deny this.
ScotExotic said:
Hey there zoo exclusive. Don't go being a zoo supremacist now. There's nothing wrong with being in it just for the kicks. The only thing that's wrong is abuse. I hate to say it but this bestialist bigotry is a typical response from zoo oriented exclusives.
Click to expand...
Additionally a lot of this reply is filler ^^. E.g. "Don't go being a zoo supremacist now." as well as "I hate to say it but this bestialist bigotry is a typical response from zoo oriented exclusives." there is no reason for that. It's funny but when you look at it who actually has the most unreasonable or has the technically most "bigoted" response.

I have no squabbles with you or what you do as long as your animal is happy and you both love each other. You both have mental playing fields. It is important to know that there is more than one living creature involved. They deserve respect as well.
 
MissXCoffee said:
:LOL: BDSM was never hidden when 50 shades came out. Im sorry, but comparing zoophilia to a shitty Twilight fanfic book that happened to make BDSM more culturally popular and relevant at the time is a non point :p
Click to expand...
Not really a non-point when BDSM in the public eye was NOT a thing. It became way more of a social kink when it became a culturally relevant point. It was absolutely more socially acceptable when everyone realized it was "normal". BDSM was mainstream, even if the book itself was fucking garbage trash. 50 Shades absolutely had an impact as much as we don't want it to.
 
Let me take some time to toss around some statistics.

How prevalent is Zoophilia

Statistics of how prevalent zoophilia has become
zoophilia.wiki zoophilia.wiki
LGBT.BST.ZPH.PNG

The fact is that it may not become "More Popular" maybe that people are starting to become more comfortable and those who left are coming back. We are also on the precipice of a Zoo movement. If we look at this chart we can see that when we compare LGBT yellow, bestiality blue, and zoophilia red. We can see that zoosexuality was even more popular and prevalent than LGBT was. When they got talked about and their rights they started to take off and zoophilia/ bestiality kind of went "underground"

I wrote a theoretical on the wiki page about this as to why the statistics have plummeted.

I believe it is because of these factors>

  • Anti-Zoo attitudes
  • Increasing of antizoophilia laws
  • People finding communities and no longer need to search google
  • People moving to safer search engines
  • The fact that the top trend was when trends first released and there was no place but down for the statistics to go
These results are based on Google search statistics.

What is interesting is that the search term "Zoophilia Sex" was up overall 800% forming on my theory that more zoos are finding their sexuality due to the pandemic. But hey. that's all I have.

1623872794521.png
1623872823575.png

For each rising search term, you see a percentage of the term’s growth compared to the previous time period. If you see “Breakout” instead of a percentage, it means that the search term grew by more than 5000%.

So these searches have grown more than 5000% percent.
 

Attachments

  • 1623872611651.png
    1623872611651.png
    16 KB · Views: 70
Last edited:
Katelyn said:
Not really a non-point when BDSM in the public eye was NOT a thing. It became way more of a social kink when it became a culturally relevant point. It was absolutely more socially acceptable when everyone realized it was "normal". BDSM was mainstream, even if the book itself was fucking garbage trash. 50 Shades absolutely had an impact as much as we don't want it to.
Click to expand...

BDSM has always been popular! Yes, 50 shades made it more culturally popular and appropriate to talk about, but it has always been a thing in the public eye. Why do you think it sold so well? If there was such a stigma attached to BDSM as there is with zoophilia, then simply the release of the book would of been heavily condemned. I'm not saying 50 shades didn't have an impact to the popularity of BDSM- im saying comparing the book's popularity with BDSM due to it's release to zoophilia is non-comparable.

A large majority of the population is into BDSM kinks- even if it wasn't as mainstream before 50 shades (but still very popular). A larger part of the population could be into zoophilia than most of people assume (no large scale studys have been done, I'm guessing cus of it's nature) but no way is it as near as the popularity of BDSM. Otherwise why would we be stigmatised so much, and yet BDSM wasn't stigmatised to nearly the same extent before 50 shades?
 
BDSM and Zoo were ALWAYS out there. Just look at those 70's sex comics full of BDSM and all those vintage zoo vids from back in those days. Now, how many people did it? Probably about the same as today, but I'm basing that on... absolutely nothing but my personal belief, so take that with a grain of salt.
 
As each generation passes, I believe women have gained more freedom to explore their sexuality and sexual desires/needs/interests. There was a time not very long ago where all girls were told to save themselves for marriage and even today, many are trained that sex is for procreation only.

As far as zoo goes, I don't think that it will become significantly more popular and definitely not mainstream in any way. There always has been a segment of the silent population that has done it. On the fringe, there maybe a few more zoo's because the Internet has opened the door for people to see it exists and there will be those who may try out of curiosity or desire. Unfortunately, there also may be some who see it something to monetize.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top