• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Do you consider anthropomorphic Zoo?

K

kitti33krylix

Tourist
ok . hi everyone,
i have recently delved into the subject of Zoophilia and done a LOT of research, and reading and in the midst of that have seen a few things about having fantasies about / fantasies wanting to be anthropomorphic animals and that it is like a class 1 on the tiers /spectrum of zoo and curious to the thoughts of others ?
 
I would say that they are subsets of general xenophilia. Lots of overlap in the Venn diagram there.
 
I've not really thought about it too much but I as somebody who can find both anthro/furry stuff attractive as well as irl animals, I think I have to say they're pretty different.

I obviously love and care for animals a whole lot, and obviously we don't have a real life version of anthropomorphic animals so it's not really a fair comparison, but! In my mind they're different because of the humanoid form and equal level intelligence. Sure it's not real but I don't think it's quite on the level of zoo.

But that's just my opinion!
 
If anthros were real, it would blur the line as to whats considered truly zoo or not. Where do you consider the ratio of fur to human is?
 
Eh, I think it could count! It could also count as monster fuckin/xeno though depending on the vibes. Idk if wanting to fuck a cat girl, for example, is necessarily zooey.... BUT I like the idea of it being a spectrum.

A standard werewolf probably hits all three! anthro, zoo, and xeno notes can all be found there. I think it's awesome actually, how much of human sexuality can overlap like this
 
No I don't think anthropomorphs would be considered zoo because they wouldn't be animals but rather sentient beings.
 
LostDog said:
No I don't think anthropomorphs would be considered zoo because they wouldn't be animals but rather sentient beings.
Click to expand...
This this is one of those moments where pedantics actually matter.

Pretty universally most animals are already sentient.

Word you're looking for is sapient which tends to be associated with full self-awareness and a certain level of intelligence.

People interchange them a lot, but there's a difference.
 
nekdoneco123 said:
an actual anthropomorphic animal (ie not a dude/dudette in a plush suit) would be a dream come true.
Click to expand...
I don't consider myself zoo, (my partner is into watching women+doggy) but anthropomorphic ones are def cool w me, NOT IN THE SUIT I don't like the suit, which is why I kinda asked this??? Like horse cawk is noice, but I do not fancy the animal attached in any sexual manner so????
 
otherdog said:
Eh, I think it could count! It could also count as monster fuckin/xeno though depending on the vibes. Idk if wanting to fuck a cat girl, for example, is necessarily zooey.... BUT I like the idea of it being a spectrum.

A standard werewolf probably hits all three! anthro, zoo, and xeno notes can all be found there. I think it's awesome actually, how much of human sexuality can overlap like this
Click to expand...
Wat is xeno? And you're right! That is cool.
 
pes said:
It is more furry than zoo. But lots of furries are also zoos or eventually get there.
Click to expand...
I don't consider myself a furry either tho cus I don't care for the suits man there's nothing hot abt that to me?? Like id def fuck my partner in a giant animal suit (there's this porn thing called pandafuck should look into it where girls fuck a giant panda suit with a strap on ) but I don't know that the animal part of it would be the turn on??

GingerUnicorn said:
I've not really thought about it too much but I as somebody who can find both anthro/furry stuff attractive as well as irl animals, I think I have to say they're pretty different.

I obviously love and care for animals a whole lot, and obviously we don't have a real life version of anthropomorphic animals so it's not really a fair comparison, but! In my mind they're different because of the humanoid form and equal level intelligence. Sure it's not real but I don't think it's quite on the level of zoo.

But that's just my opinion!
Click to expand...
I personally find the lesser intelligence and inability to consent a bit of a slippy slope tbh. I don't find animals attractive sexually/romantically honestly.
Nor ppl in furry suits,
But anthropomorphic animals / monsters/alien/tentacles are a big yes to me, along with the fantasy toys like horse cock dildos //knotted toys I can get into for sure... But I can't say I fancy horses/doggys in a sexual way 😅

milabue said:
I would say that they are subsets of general xenophilia. Lots of overlap in the Venn diagram there.
Click to expand...
Wait does that mean I would be a xenophile??? It says aliens 😅
Monsters / aliens /tentacles are def my cup of tea
 
As someone whom is a furry, and been in the fandom for many years.. no I do not. Not even quadruped furries. This is mainly because they are still anthro. Anthropomorphism isn't just standing on two legs like the vast majority of people think, which is so incredibly annoying. It's the process of having human traits. Bipedalism is only one of those traits. An animal that has the capability of human speech, human reason and other capabilities is very much an anthro, even on four legs.

Your talking cartoon dog is basically an alien compared to the normal dog laying on your couch! I really wish other furs, and people in general understood that. While it is true zoophilia can overlap with anthros and furs, it's not directly black and white in that regard.
This also goes for animal genitalia on anthros. No, it is not automatically zooey, specifically because you can find a non human penis or vagina hot in of itself, but find no attraction to the living animal that possesses it. It is why you can buy a knotted dildo and find it pleasurable, but not want any sex with an actual dog.
 
Maylam said:
As someone whom is a furry, and been in the fandom for many years.. no I do not. Not even quadruped furries. This is mainly because they are still anthro. Anthropomorphism isn't just standing on two legs like the vast majority of people think, which is so incredibly annoying. It's the process of having human traits. Bipedalism is only one of those traits. An animal that has the capability of human speech, human reason and other capabilities is very much an anthro, even on four legs.

Your talking cartoon dog is basically an alien compared to the normal dog laying on your couch! I really wish other furs, and people in general understood that. While it is true zoophilia can overlap with anthros and furs, it's not directly black and white in that regard.
This also goes for animal genitalia on anthros. No, it is not automatically zooey, specifically because you can find a non human penis or vagina hot in of itself, but find no attraction to the living animal that possesses it. It is why you can buy a knotted dildo and find it pleasurable, but not want any sex with an actual dog.
Click to expand...
I agree 100% I do not have any interest in animals, but anthro is hotttt to me 😳, and tbh I can get jiggy w the whole horse cock thingggg but I don't wanna bang a horse 🤣, I was just curious abt what actual zoos thought, bc I was researching and found a tier list from some psychology study that classed zoophilia similar to necropholias tier list and class 1 had anthro / ppl who wanna be animals
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top