• Suddenly unable to log into your ZooVille account? This might be the reason why: CLICK HERE!

Curious!

I have a feeling female/interspecies sexual contact significantly more common than society would allow anyone to reveal…. Statistically, from studies, it’s significantly higher than what’s represented on this forum. Which would indicate that it’s probably even a higher percentage than what even the studies indicate due to the social stigma around the subject. It would not shock me in the least if the actual number was closer to 2 in 5…. I read one study recently (in psychology today) that put the number as high as 80% for at least one sexual encounter for women in a lifetime…. Which seems a bit of a reach, but definitely not out of the realm of possibility I suppose.
~D
 
Yeah, its not going to be as many as you fantasize. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia

The Kinsey report back in the late 40s stated around 10% of the population had thought of or engaged in a sexual act with an animal. That number is much much lower as Kinseys study on sexuality included a very large number of inmates.

In 1975 another study was done that found it was less than 5%.

Various online studies as recent as 2014 have shown even less interest.

Personally I believe that 5% of the population would be a fair estimate. 1% of women and 4% men.

Look up the statistics for zooville on any marketing research reviewer such as similarweb. 650k people (2% of the US) logged in over 3 months, 11% women (71k) and 89% men (578k). Numerically, I now see why I was treated so horribly on this site when I announced my pregnancy last March. Whomever is in charge of marketing Zooville online really needs a rebrand specifically geared to attract women.
 
AtomicCookie said:
Yeah, its not going to be as many as you fantasize. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia

The Kinsey report back in the late 40s stated around 10% of the population had thought of or engaged in a sexual act with an animal. That number is much much lower as Kinseys study on sexuality included a very large number of inmates.

In 1975 another study was done that found it was less than 5%.

Various online studies as recent as 2014 have shown even less interest.

Personally I believe that 5% of the population would be a fair estimate. 1% of women and 4% men.

Look up the statistics for zooville on any marketing research reviewer such as similarweb. 650k people (2% of the US) logged in over 3 months, 11% women (71k) and 89% men (578k). Numerically, I now see why I was treated so horribly on this site when I announced my pregnancy last March. Whomever is in charge of marketing Zooville online really needs a rebrand specifically geared to attract women.
Click to expand...
Now this I can agree with...

But at the same time, it's a double edged sword.

With the stigma, and more specifically the laws surrounding this, it makes it hard for real zoos to "take out the trash", and the "trash" doesn't see itself as trash, and therefore won't police itself to not be trash..

So many (mostly men) find all of this because they're digging through porn and stumbled onto something and have this thought that if a woman is getting fucked by a dog, then she must be desperate or easy.

Never taking the time to consider that this is just something that some of us enjoy and it has nothing to do with desperation..

Then there's the ones that claim to be zoos, but want to jump someone's ass because they like critters and humans, with no thought to "Live and let live", when that's exactly what they claim to want for themselves.

I don't know what the answer is..

It would certainly be cool to be able to have a site that was free from all of that, where people could talk, women feel welcome without a line of horny fucks beating a trail to their doors..
 
K_9River_rat said:
Now this I can agree with...

But at the same time, it's a double edged sword.

With the stigma, and more specifically the laws surrounding this, it makes it hard for real zoos to "take out the trash", and the "trash" doesn't see itself as trash, and therefore won't police itself to not be trash..

So many (mostly men) find all of this because they're digging through porn and stumbled onto something and have this thought that if a woman is getting fucked by a dog, then she must be desperate or easy.

Never taking the time to consider that this is just something that some of us enjoy and it has nothing to do with desperation..

Then there's the ones that claim to be zoos, but want to jump someone's ass because they like critters and humans, with no thought to "Live and let live", when that's exactly what they claim to want for themselves.

I don't know what the answer is..

It would certainly be cool to be able to have a site that was free from all of that, where people could talk, women feel welcome without a line of horny fucks beating a trail to their doors..
Click to expand...
Gaia Gold had that and so does iKnot.club. Both of which you have to pay like $400 to gain entry. The thought behind it is if someone pays that much they aren't going to fuck around and get themselves banned. Also, because money is involved, no matter how obscure the trail, there is still a trail that leads to you. Gaia closed years ago due to horrible management as it was run by the same people assholes who run AOZ. Heavy ties to the Russian/Slovakian Mob from what I've heard. They also cater specifically to those with they most money. I get banned for telling one of them they were a creep who should grow a bigger dick and fuck themselves. He didn't like being treated the way he was treating me. Anyways, I've heard Iknot.club is run by the same guy who produced the underage Skye Blue boxer movie. Essentially he's a pedo. And those are/were the safest forums for women since BeastForum closed. How completely fucked is that?

My main concern is protecting my identity. I dont know how much I can trust it, which is why I dont share things publicly any more, but I do like the ZV feature which supposedly scrubs meta data (containing the device information used to record or capture the picture or movie) from the pictures and movies which are posted here so that no one can find you by looking at the coding within the images/movies which are uploaded. 2nd concern is the overwhelming amount of maga douches and incels. So many here there's a ridiculously active subforum created just for them to shit and piss in called the dumpster fire. If that isn't the biggest immediate glaring red flag on this site then I dont know what is.
 
AtomicCookie said:
Gaia Gold had that and so does iKnot.club. Both of which you have to pay like $400 to gain entry. The thought behind it is if someone pays that much they aren't going to fuck around and get themselves banned. Also, because money is involved, no matter how obscure the trail, there is still a trail that leads to you. Gaia closed years ago due to horrible management as it was run by the same people assholes who run AOZ. Heavy ties to the Russian/Slovakian Mob from what I've heard. They also cater specifically to those with they most money. I get banned for telling one of them they were a creep who should grow a bigger dick and fuck themselves. He didn't like being treated the way he was treating me. Anyways, I've heard Iknot.club is run by the same guy who produced the underage Skye Blue boxer movie. Essentially he's a pedo. And those are/were the safest forums for women since BeastForum closed. How completely fucked is that?

My main concern is protecting my identity. I dont know how much I can trust it, which is why I dont share things publicly any more, but I do like the ZV feature which supposedly scrubs meta data (containing the device information used to record or capture the picture or movie) from the pictures and movies which are posted here so that no one can find you by looking at the coding within the images/movies which are uploaded. 2nd concern is the overwhelming amount of maga douches and incels. So many here there's a ridiculously active subforum created just for them to shit and piss in called the dumpster fire. If that isn't the biggest immediate glaring red flag on this site then I dont know what is.
Click to expand...
Eh.. I kinda like the dumpster fire..

Granted, sometimes some really dumb shit gets said there, but hey, free country, free speech and all that.. Even though I know that the dumpster fire isn't protected by the constitution and all that, I do like the concept, even if I don't always like what is said there..

Some of the stuff said really gets me to thinking about things that I've never given much thought to or researched, and today is case in point..

Because of something said there, I'm now reading the Ferderalist papers myself instead of taking someone else's words about what the authors of the constitution and Bill of rights meant when they said this or that..

But back to the subject at hand.. I feel the same way about protecting my identity..

If it wasn't for the legal shit surrounding this, I wouldn't care and would actually perhaps like to meet other people, although I'm not really into that idea to actually DO anything other than sit around and bullshit with drinks..

I mean, it would be cool to be able to share the experience, but for me, that isn't going to happen with just anyone that's willing...
 
AtomicCookie said:
Me too. Biggest early warning system for anyone who messages me. Get to look at who they really are. 90% not worth replying to.
Click to expand...
I honestly try to be middle of the road and try to see all sides, even the really extreme points of view, and try to find middle ground..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top